Abstract
Concurrent designing of tolerance has become a vital concern in product and process development due to the relationship between quality, functionality and product cost. It is one of the well explored areas in combinatorial optimization. In this paper, a recently developed optimization algorithm, called Bat algorithm (BA), is used for optimizing the tolerance based on concurrent objectives to minimize the manufacturing cost, present worth of expected quality loss and quality loss. The mechanical assemblies such as Bevel gear assembly (A), Gear box assembly (B) and Suction union assembly (C) are considered to demonstrate the proposed algorithm. It is found that the BA has produced better results than other methods in initial generations for concurrent tolerance problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Govindarajalu, S. Karuppan and T. Manoharan, Tolerance design of mechanical assembly using NSGA II and finite element analysis, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26 (2012) 3261–3268.
R. Chhabra and M. R. Emami, A holistic approach to concurrent engineering and its applications to robotics, PConcurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 22 (2014) 48–6.
K. M. Cheng and J. C Tsai, Optimal statistical tolerance allocation for reciprocal exponential cost-tolerance function, Proceeding of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 227 (2013) 650–656.
K. M. Cheng and J. C. Tsai, Optimal statistical tolerance allocation of assemblies for minimum manufacturing cost, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 52-54 (2011) 1818–1823.
Z. Dong, W. Hu and D. Xue, New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance synthesis, Transactions of ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 116 (1994) 199–206.
B. Forouraghi, Worst-case tolerance design and quality assurance via genetic algorithms, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 113 (2002) 251–268.
B. Forouraghi, Optimal tolerance allocation using a multiobjective particle swarm optimizer, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 44 (2009) 710–724.
I. Gonzalez and T Sanchez, Optimal centering and tolerance synthesis for non-independent and non-normal variables, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (2015) DOI.10.1007/s00170-015-6907-7. M.F.
H. Meifa and Z. Yanru, Optimized sequential design of two dimensional tolerances, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 33 (2007) 579–593.
G. Krishna and K. M. Rao, Simultaneous optimal selection of design and manufacturing tolerances with different stack-up conditions using scatter search, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30 (2006) 328–333.
P. Muthu, V. Dhanalakshmi and K. Sankaranaryanasamy, Optimal tolerance design of assembly for minimum quality loss and manufacturing cost using meta-heuristic algorithms, International Jounal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 44 (2009) 1154–1164.
H. Peng, X. Q. Jiang, Z. G. Xu and X. J. Liu, Optimal tolerance design for products with correlated characteristics by considering the present worth of quality loss, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39 (2008) 1–8.
G. Prabhaharan, P. Asokan and S. Rajendran, Sensitivitybased conceptual design and tolerance allocation using the continuous ants colony algorithm (CACO), International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25 (2005) 516–526.
R. P. Rez, J. Ciurana, C. Riba and A. Molina, Concurrent conceptual evaluation of tolerances synthesis in mechanical design, Concurrent and Industrial Engineering, 56 (2009) 1402–1413.
D. Salazar, C. M. Rocco and B. Galvan, Optimization of constrained multiple-objective reliability problems using evolutionary algorithms, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91 (2006) 1057–1070.
A. Saravanan, C. Balamurugan, K. Sivakumar and S. Rambalan, Optimal geometric tolerance design framework for rigid parts with assembly function requirements using evolutionary algorithms, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2014) DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5908-2.
P. K. Singh, P. K. Jain and S. C. Jain, Advanced optimal tolerance design of mechanical assemblies with interrelated dimension chain and process precision limits, Computers in Industry, 56 (2005) 179–194.
P. K. Singh, S. C. Jain and P. K. Jain, A GA based solution to optimum tolerance synthesis of mechanical assemblies with alternative manufacturing process: Focus on complex tolerancing problems, International Journal of Simulation and Modelling, 42 (2004) 5185–5215.
M. Sivakumar and B. Stalin, Optimum tolerance synthesis for complex assembly with alternative process selection using lagrange multiplier method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 44 (2009) 405–411.
M. Sivakumar, S. M. Kannan and V. Jayabalan, A new algorithm for optimum tolerance allocation of complex assemblies with alternative process selection, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40 (2009) 819–836.
K. Sivakumar, C. Balamurugan and S. Ramabalan, Simultaneous optimal selection of design and manufacturing tolerances with alternative manufacturing process selection, ComputerAided Design, 43 (2011) 207–218.
K. Sivakumar, C. Balamurugan and S. Ramabalan, Evolutionary multi-objective concurrent maximization of process tolerances, International Journal of Production Research, 50 (2012) 3172–3191.
A. Trabelsi and A. Delchambre, Assessment on tolerance representation and tolerance analysis in assemblies, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 4 (2000) 244–262.
F. Wu, D. Jean-Yves, E. Alain, S. Ali and M. Patrick, Improved algorithm for tolerance allocation based on monte carlo simulation and discrete optimization, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 56 (2009) 1402–1413.
B. Ye and F. A. Salustri, Simulaneous tolerance synthesis for manufacturing and quality, Research in Engineering Design, 14 (2003) 98–106.
M. M. Ettefagh and M. S. Javash, Optimal synthesis of fourbar steering mechanism using AIS and genetic algorithms, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28 (2014) 2351–2362.
X. S. Yang, A new meta-heuristic bat inspired algorithm, in: Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NISCO 2010), Computational Intelligence, Springer Berlin, Springer, 284 (2010) 65–74.
H. Peng, Concurrent tolerancing for design and manufacturing based on the present worth of quality loss, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 59 (2012) 929–937.
H. F. Fang and Z. T. Wu, Concurrent tolerance design and methods of technology economy assessment in process route, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 36 (4) (2000) 74–77, 85.
S. G. Liu, Q. Jin, P. Wang and R. J. Xie, Closed-form solutions for multi-objective tolerance optimization, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70 (2014) 1859–1866.
K. Sivakumar, C. Balamurugan and S. Rambalan, Concurrent multi-objective tolerance allocation of mechanical assemblies considering alternative manufacturing process selection, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 53 (2011) 711–732.
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2) (2002) 182–197.
R. G. Miodragovic and R. R. Bulatovic, Loop bat family algorithm (Loop BFA) for constrained optimization, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (8) (2015) 3329–3341.
K. Khan and A. Sahai, A comparison of BA, GA, PSO, BP and LM for training feed forward neural networks in eleaning context, International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7 (2012) 23–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Recommended by Associate Editor Byeong Dong Youn
L. Ramesh Kumar is currently working as an Assistant Professor in Department of Mechanical Engineering, Christian college of Engineering and Technology, Oddanchatram, Tamil nadu, India. He received his B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) from PSNA College of Engineering and Technology and M.E (CAD/CAM) from RVS College of Engineering and Technology. He is currently doing his Ph.D. in Anna University-Chennai, Tamil nadu, India. He has published 10 papers in international journals and conferences. His current research interest includes Tolerance analysis and Optimization.
K. P. Padmanaban is currently working as a Professor in Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kurinji College of Engineering and Technology, Trichirappalli, Tamil nadu, India. He received his B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) from Thiagarajar College of Engineering and M.E. (DESIGN) from Government College of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Anna University-Chennai, Tamil nadu, India. He has published more than 60 papers in international journals. His current research interest includes Finite Element Analysis and Optimization.
S. Ganesh Kumar, M.E., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India. His area of research is “Layout design and optimization”. He is life member of various professional bodies like ISTE, IAENG. He has published 10 technical paper in the referred International journals and more than 10 papers in the National and international conferences.
C. Balamurugan is currently working as an Associate Professor in Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy Campus, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India. He received his B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) from Tiruchy Engineering College and M.E. (CAD/CAM) from J.J. College of Engineering and Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Anna University-Chennai, Tamil nadu, India. He has published 21 papers in national and international conferences and 22 international and 2 national journal papers. His current research interest includes Tolerance analysis, Optimization and Trajectory planning of Robot.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, L.R., Padmanaban, K.P., Kumar, S.G. et al. Design and optimization of concurrent tolerance in mechanical assemblies using bat algorithm. J Mech Sci Technol 30, 2601–2614 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0521-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0521-y