Skip to main content
Log in

Robust design of railway vehicle suspension using a process capability index

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robust design for the primary suspension of a railway vehicle was performed according to the optimization of 10 dynamic responses representing driving safety and ride comfort, in which response surface models (RSMs) from the design of experiments (DOEs) were applied. To evaluate the probabilistic feasibility of robustness, an intensive computational process is mandatory. In the present study, the authors utilized the first-order Taylor series expansion to reduce the computational burden associated with a probabilistic feasibility evaluation, thus easily obtaining both an individual mean and variance of constraints. To overcome the difficulty of optimizing the mean and probabilistic variances for the 10 dynamic responses, a process capability index (Cpk) was introduced, which shows the mean value and scattering of the product quality to a certain extent and normalizes the objective functions irrespective of varying dimensions. Consequently, the robust design to optimize the 10 dynamic responses minimized the Cpk subjected to the constraint of Cpk ≥ 2, which satisfied 6σ. The proposed method improved the Cpk that violated the constraints obtained by the RSMs from DOEs and minimized the variance of the Cpk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. S. Phadke, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Chen, J. K. Allen, K.-L. Tsui and F. Mistree, A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors, Transactions of the ASME, 118 (1996) 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Parkinson, C. Sorensen and N. Pourhassan, A general approach for robust optimal design, Journal of Mechanical Design, 115(1) (1993) 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. E. Kane, Process Capability Indices, Journal of Quality Technology, 18(1) (1986) 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. K. Park, K. K. Lee, T. H. Lee and D. S. Bae, Optimization of a train suspension using Kriging model, Trans. of the KSME (A), 27(6) (2003) 864–870.

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.vampire-dynamics.com.

  7. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Vlahinos and S. Kelkar, Designing for six-sigma quality with robust optimization using CAE, International Body Engineering Conference, SAE paper no. 02IBECA-28, Paris, France (2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Ho Han.

Additional information

Kwang-Ki Lee received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Hanyang University, Korea, in 1986 and 1988, respectively. He is a Ph.D candidate in Hanyang University, Korea. Lee is currently a Consulting Division Director of VP KOREA, Korea. Lee’s research interests are DOEs, meta-modeling, and multi-objective robust optimization.

Seung-Ho Han received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Hanyang University, Korea, in 1989 and 1991, respectively. He then received his Doctor degree from RWTH Aachen, Germany, in 1996. Dr. Han is currently a Professor at the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering at Donga University in Busan, Korea. Dr. Han’s research interests include reliability based design, and fatigue life extension technique.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, KK., Park, CK. & Han, SH. Robust design of railway vehicle suspension using a process capability index. J Mech Sci Technol 24, 215–218 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-1131-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-1131-8

Keywords

Navigation