Skip to main content
Log in

Impacts of knowledge management on the organizationlal success

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Although there is a common consensus on the importance of the effective knowledge management, systematic studies regarding the value of knowledge management have somewhat been missing, especially in the construction industry. This study attempts to evaluate the impacts of knowledge management on the organizational success. In doing so, the CII Knowledge Implementation Index (CKII) which quantifies the level of organizational knowledge implementation, is used as an indicator of how well an organization adopts the knowledge management process. In order to assess the level of the organizational success, individual project performance data is used in terms of cost, schedule, quality, and safety performance. Based on the analysis results, organizations with the higher CKII scores have better performance than the others in all of the project performance indicators. Therefore, it is logical to state that the analyses between the CKII and performance metrics reveal in general positive relationships, which validate the impacts of the effective knowledge management on the organizational success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barthes, J. P. (1996). “ISMICK and knowledge management.” Proceedings of ISMICK196, Knowledge Management: Organization, Competence and Methodology, J. F. Schreinemakers, Ed., pp. 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blosch, M. (2001). “Pragmatism and organizational knowledge management.” Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. and Staunton, N. (1989). Innovation in technology and organization, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarest, M. (1997). “Understanding knowledge management.” Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, F., Lucas, C., and Ali, M. (2004). “Managing knowledge effectively.” Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, J. W. (2000). The conceptual modeling of a lessons-learned system for large construction companies, MSc Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. B. (2014). “Quantitative evaluation on organizational knowledge implementation in the construction industry.” Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. B. and Gibson, G. E. (2001). A guide to the CII Implementation model and knowledge structure, CII Implementation Resource, Research Report 166-2, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. B. and Gibson, G. E. (2002). Assessment of CII knowledge implementation at the organization level, A report to the Construction Industry Institute, Research Report 166-11, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology.” Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, Y. W. and Elaine A. (2006). “Development of a knowledge management initiative and system: A case study.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novianto, O. and Puspasari, D. (2012). “Knowledge management system’s implementation in a company with different generations: A case study.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 942–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., and Jones, G. (1997). “Knowledge management: A strategic agenda.” Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., Rebeck, K., and The Knowledge Management Methodology Tea. (2001). “A systems thinking framework for knowledge management.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (1993). “Corporate knowledge management.” Proceedings of ISMICK193, Compiegne, France, pp. 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Construction Industry Institute (CII) (1998). Planning for startup, CII Implementation Resource, Research Report 121-2, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2001). CII Annual safety report, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2002). CII BM&M summary, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2013). Construction industry Institute, <https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/index.cfm> (March, 29, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D. R. (1998). The knowledge-enabled organization: Moving from “training” to “learning” to meet business goals, AMACON Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. T. and Wan, C. S. (2004). “Advancing organizational effectiveness and knowledge management implementation Tourism Management.” Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 593–601.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. B. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.B. Impacts of knowledge management on the organizationlal success. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 1609–1617 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0243-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0243-6

Keywords

Navigation