Abstract
Human reliability analysis (HRA) is an expansion of man-machine engineering. It is also a new multidisciplinary based on behavioral science, cognitive science, information processing, system analysis and probability statistics in order to analyze, predict, reduce and prevent human errors. Firstly, the quantitative analysis model of HRA is proposed based on Markov process theory by using human error probability (HEP) and error correction cycle (ECC) as parameters. And human reliability evaluation criterion is built. Then, the HRA process considering error correction is proposed based on cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Finally, according to the characteristics of armored vehicle system, common performance condition (CPC) in CREAM is improved. A reliability impact index is characterized by the overall contexts of tasks. Human reliability evaluation criterion of armored vehicle system is formulated. And the result of HRA is obtained based on the method presented in this paper. In addition, the relative weights are estimated by combining scale of 10/10—18/2 and analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and the triangular fuzzy number considering confidence factor and optimism index is adopted in order to reduce the subjectivity. The analysis results show that the method presented in this paper is reasonable and feasible. Meantime, the method can provide guidance for human reliability analysis of other weapon systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SWAIN A D, GUTTMANN H E. A handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications [R]. Washington, D C: USNRC, 1983.
HOLLNAGEL E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method [M]. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 1998.
BARRIERE M. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis [R]. Washington, D C: USNRC, 2000.
WOODS D D, ROTH E M, POPLE JR H. Cognitive environment simulation: An artificial intelligence system for human performance assessment [R]. Washington, D C: USNRC, 2016.
CACCIABUE P C, DECORTIS F, DROZDOWICZ B, et al. COSIMO: A cognitive simulation model for human decision making and behavior in accident management of complex plants [J]. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 2009, 22(5): 1058–1074.
CHAI S, YU J X, DU Z F et al. Quantitative human reliability analysis methods and application of offshore engineering [J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2011, 44(10): 914–919 (in Chinese).
ZHAN J Z. The research on scale in AHP [D]. Nanning: College of Mathematics, Guangxi University, 2005 (in Chinese).
LIANG QW, SONG BW, MAO Z Y. Reliability fuzzy distribution method based on entropy weight [J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2005, 30(7): 73–76 (in Chinese).
DHILLON B S. Human reliability and error in transportation systems [M]. London: Springer, 2007.
DHILLON B S. Human reliability, error, and human factors in engineering maintenance: With reference to aviation and power generation [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: the Technical Basis Projects of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (No. ZQ092012B003)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, X., Dong, H., Dong, X. et al. Human reliability analysis method on armored vehicle system considering error correction. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 21, 472–477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1749-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1749-5
Keywords
- human reliability analysis (HRA)
- error correction
- cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM)
- armored vehicle system