Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Child Subjective Well-Being in South Korea and the UK: Testing an Ecological Systems Approach

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws on Bronfenbrenner’s (1992) ecological systems theory to explore links between various domains of children’s subjective well-being and their overall subjective well-being, comparing South Korea and the UK. Data are drawn from the Children’s Worlds study (www.isciweb.org), which surveyed children in diverse national contexts. A model of subjective well-being is proposed which our analysis indicates is comparable across the two countries, including children’s ratings of their well-being in the domains of their local community, school, family, their family’s economic situation, and their overall subjective well-being. The model is a stronger predictor of subjective well-being in South Korea than in the UK, suggesting that these variables better capture the factors influencing variation between children in the South Korean context. However, the comparability of the models indicates that there is a core of similarity between the lives of children in these two very different contexts. This supports the value of studies such as the Children’s Worlds survey as enhancing our understanding of the meaning and experience of childhood in diverse contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, S. H., & Lee, S. S. (2012). Explaining Korean welfare state development with new empirical data and methods’. Asian Social Work and Policy, 6(2), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

  • Ben Arieh, A., Kaufman, N. H., Andrews, A. B., Goerge, R. M., Joo Lee, B., & Aber, J. L. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2004). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. In Social indicators research (vol. 74, pp. 573–596).

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2006). Measuring and monitoring the well-being of young children around the world. Background paper prepared for the ‘Education for all global monitoring report 2007’. Available online from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147444e.pdf.

  • Bollen, B. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., Rees, G., & Goswami, H. (2010). Children’s subjective well-being: international comparative perspectices’. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Martorano, B., Natali, L., & de Neubourg, C. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being in rich countries. UNICEF Working Paper WP-2013-03. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2010). PM speech on wellbeing. Delivered on 25th November 2010 at the Cabinet Office. Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-wellbeing.

  • Casas, F., & Rees, G. (2015). Measures of children’s subjective well-being: analysis of the potential for cross-national comparisons’. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Personal Wellbeing Index-School Children (PWI-SC). Available online at http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/pwi-school.pdf.

  • Duncan Smith, I. (2015). Government to strengthen child poverty measure. Accessed online from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-strengthen-child-poverty-measure. Accessed July 2015.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B. (2012). Comparing welfare state regimes: Are typologies an ideal or realistic strategy?. Paper presented at the European Social Policy Analysis Network ESPAnet conference, in Edinburgh on 6–8 September 2012. Available online from http://www.cas.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/89033/Ebbinghaus_-_Stream_2.pdf/.

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1998). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. M. (2006). Social capital and children’s wellbeing: a critical synthesis of the international social capital literature. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15, 2–18.

  • Garbarino, J. (2014). Ecological perspectives on child well-being’. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being: Theories, methods and policies in global perspective. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, H. (1997). Children, childhood and English society, 1880–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, A., & Phillips, D. (2015). Benefit spending and reforms: The Coalition government’s record. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. et al. (2013). Korea children survey, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1990). Public/Catholi defferences in the high school and beyond data: a multigroup structural equation modeling approach to testing mean defferences. Jounal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 15(3), 199–235.

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). How’s life? 2013: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201392-en.

  • Palmer, S. (2015). Toxic childhood. London: Orion Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 591(1), 25–39.

  • Park, J. I., Park, C. U., Seo, J., & Youm, Y. S. (2010). Collection of korean child well-being index and its international comparison with other OECD countries. Korean Journal of Socialogy, 44(2), 121–154.

  • Raynaert, D., Bouverne-de Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2009). A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood, 16(4), 518–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, H., & Portes, J. (2014). Cumulative impact assessment: A research report by Landman Economics and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research for the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 94. Available online from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/Cumulative%20Impact%20Assessment%20full%20report%2030-07-14.pdf.

  • Rees, G. Main, G. (ed.) (2015). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 15 countries: An initial report on Children’s Worlds survey, 2013-14, Children’s World project (ISCWeB), York: http://www.isciweb.org/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/ChildrensWorlds2015-FullReport-Final.pdf.

  • Rees, G., Goswami, H., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Developing an index of children’s subjective well-being in England. London: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G., Goswami, H., Pople, L., Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., & Main, G. (2013). The good childhood report 2013. London: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimoni, E., & Ben Arieh, A. (2013). Children’s relations and their subjective well-being in an ecological perspective. Presentation for the 4rd Conference of the International Society for Child Indicators, presented in Seoul, May 29th-31st 2013.

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assesseing measurement invariance in cross national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social process. OECD.

  • The World Factbook (2014). Accessed online from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

  • UNICEF. (2014). Children of the recession: The impact of the economic crisis on child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 12. Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunsuk Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S., Main, G. Comparing Child Subjective Well-Being in South Korea and the UK: Testing an Ecological Systems Approach. Child Ind Res 10, 19–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9373-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9373-3

Keywords

Navigation