Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Responding to Child Maltreatment: a Framework for Mapping Child Protection Agencies

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there is a growing number of international population surveys about rates of child maltreatment there is much less data on legal, health and social services responses to maltreatment. Agency surveys are a cost effective method for assessing this response in countries where there is limited administrative data available about child maltreatment reports, investigations and services. The first step in conducting such survey is to map out the network of agencies and organizations tasked with responding to child maltreatment, as part of a multi-stage sampling strategy to identify a representative sample of child maltreatment reports and investigations. This endeavor can be complex as a diverse universe of agencies are involved in protecting victimized children and supporting their families—government-run child protective services, child protection teams at hospitals, not-for-profit helplines, psychotherapists at private practices, and community-based child welfare organizations, to name a few examples. This paper offers a framework for mapping child protection along the dimensions of levels of authority, functions and processes. Beyond high-income countries with well-established child protection systems, it gives special consideration to informal structures such as councils of community leaders and non-governmental organizations’ consortiums in low-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term “agency” in a generic fashion in reference to formal or less formal organizations or community groups that are mandated in some way to respond to situations of child maltreatment.

References

  • Bancroft, C. (2011). An ethnographic study of community-based child protection mechanisms in Ache, Indonesia. Indonesia: The Center on Child Protection, University of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothby, N., Stark, L., Simmons, K., & Chu, E. (2009). Child protection information management mapping: Towards a data surveillance system in Indonesia. New York: UNICEF, University of Indonesia, and Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, S. (2012). Report of the mapping and analysis of Ghana's child protection system: Final report. Accra-North: UNICEF Ghana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child Protection in Crisis (CPC) Network. (2012). Mapping community-based child protection mechanisms—Uganda. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. E., & Chamberland, C. (2007). Physical violence and psychological aggression towards children: five-year trends in practices and attitudes from two population surveys. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(9), 1001–1011. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eynon, A., & Lilley, S. (2010). Strengthening national child protection systems in emergencies through community-based systems: A discussion paper. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, B., Trocmé, N., MacLaurin, B., Sinha, V., & Herbert, A. (2010). Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect—2008: Process evaluation report. Toronto: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendrich, S., Pothmann, J., & Tabel, A. (2014). Monitor Hilfen zur Erziehung 2014 [Surveillance of support for children and families 2014]. Dortmund: AKJStat.

  • Child Frontiers. (2010). Mapping and analysis of the child protection system in Sierra Leone. Hong Kong: Child Frontiers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (1997). Combatting child abuse: International perspectives and trends. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., Kemp, A., Thoburn, J., Sidebotham, P., Radford, L., Glaser, D., et al. (2009). Child maltreatment 2 recognising and responding to child maltreatment. Lancet, 373(9658), 167–180. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61707-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (2003). Putting together evidence on declining trends in sexual abuse: a complex puzzle. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(2), 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jud, A., & Fegert, J. M. (2015). Kinderschutz und Vernetzung im Bereich Prävention von und Intervention bei sexuellem Kindesmissbrauch [Child protection network for prevention of and intervention in child sexual abuse cases]. In J. M. Fegert, U. Hoffmann, E. König, J. Niehues, & H. Liebhardt (Eds.), Sexueller Missbrauch von Kindern und Jugendlichen (pp. 63–73). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jud, A., & Sedlak, A. J. (2015). Agency sampling. In A. Jud, L. M. Jones, & C. Mikton (Eds.), Toolkit on mapping legal, health and social services responses to child maltreatment (pp. 20–28). Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jud, A., Lips, U., & Landolt, M. A. (2010). Characteristics associated with maltreatment types in children referred to a hospital protection team. European Journal of Pediatrics, 169(2), 173–180. doi:10.1007/s00431-009-1001-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jud, A., Fluke, J., Alink, L. R., Allan, K., Fallon, B., Kindler, H., et al. (2013). On the nature and scope of reported child maltreatment in high-income countries: opportunities for improving the evidence base. Paediatrics and International Child Health, 33(4), 207–215. doi:10.1179/2046905513Y.0000000092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jud, A., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M., & Mikton, C. (2015a). Introduction. In A. Jud, L. M. Jones, & C. Mikton (Eds.), Toolkit on mapping legal, health and social services responses to child maltreatment (pp. 1–3). Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jud, A., Jones, L. M., & Mikton, C. (2015b). Toolkit on mapping legal, health and social services response on child maltreatment. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, C. H., & Schmitt, B. D. (1978). Cost analysis of the child protection team. Pediatrics, 61(2), 328–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, P., & Jud, A. (2015). Overview of previous agency surveys and national administrative data sets. In A. Jud, L. M. Jones, & C. Mikton (Eds.), Toolkit on mapping legal, health and social services responses to child maltreatment (pp. 4–9). Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyte, A., Trocmé, N., & Chamberland, C. (2013). Evaluating where we’re at with differential response. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(2–3), 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanning, K. (2011). A pilot ethnigraphic study of informal and formal child protection systems in rural Liberia. New York: Child Protection in Crisis (CPC) Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., et al. (2010). Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS-4): Report to congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, G. R., Fluke, J., Hollinshead, D. M., & Yuan, Y. T. (2005). Alternative responses to child maltreatment: finding from NCANDS. Protecting Children, 20(2 & 3), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, V., Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Fast, E., Thomas Prokop, S., et al. (2011). Kiskisik Awasisak: Remember the children: Understanding the overrepresentation of First Nations children in the child welfare system. Ontario: Assembly of First Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Mathur, A. K. (1996). Social change and the trends in approval of corporal punishment by parents from 1968 to 1994. Family Violence against Children, 19, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Sinha, V., Black, T., Fast, E., et al. (2010). Chapter 2: Methodology. In Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) (Ed.), Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect—2008: Major findings (pp. 12–21). Ottawa: PHAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldegrave, S., & Coy, F. (2005). A differential response model for child protection in New Zealand: supporting more timely and effective responses to notifications. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 25, 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, M. (2009). What are we learning about protecting children? An inter-agency review of the evidence on community-based child protection mechanisms in humanitarian and development settings. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulczyn, F., Daro, D., Fluke, J., Feldman, S., Glodek, C., & Lifanda, K. (2010). Adapting a systems approach to child protection: Key concepts and considerations. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Nico Trocmé

  2. Lyle S. Hallman Faculty of Social Work, Wilfrid Laurier University, Kitchener, ON, Canada

    Bree Akesson

  3. School of Social Work, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Andreas Jud

Authors
  1. Nico Trocmé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bree Akesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Jud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Jud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trocmé, N., Akesson, B. & Jud, A. Responding to Child Maltreatment: a Framework for Mapping Child Protection Agencies. Child Ind Res 9, 1029–1041 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9362-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9362-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation