Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Capacity for Freedom—A New Way of Measuring Poverty Amongst Australian Children

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A little over 200 000 children and youths in Australia between the ages of 5 and 19 years were in Freedom poverty in 2003—they had low family income, and either poor health or an insufficient level of education. These individuals are some of the most disadvantaged in society due to their multiple capability restrictions. Current political rhetoric focused on increasing the education opportunities of children and youth to maximise their labour force participation in the future and thus improve their living standards may offer a means of improving the lives of these most disadvantaged children. However, half of these children have poor health and this may act as a barrier to their future labour force participation. It is shown that when looking at the health, education and labour force status of adults, amongst those with and without a disability those with a higher education had a greater likelihood of participating in the labour force—indicating policies to promote education amongst children are justified. However, it was also shown that regardless of education attainment those with a disability still had lower labour force participation rates than those without a disability. As such, efforts to increase children’s future labour force participation rates as a means of improving their living standards should also focus on improving childhood health, as well as education. Political promises to improve the lives of children should take a holistic view of the lives of individuals taking note in particular of how health may be restraining their quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The income unit is defined by the ABS as “a group of two or more related persons in the same household assumed to pool their income and savings and share the benefits deriving from them equitably; or one person assumed to have sole command over his or her income, consumption and savings” (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2005)

  2. The 2003 SDAC recorded other measures of health for those aged 15 years and over. However, given that this focus of this study was 5 to 19 year olds these other indicators of health could not be utilised.

References

  • Aassve, A., Davia, M., Iacovou, M., & Mazzuco, S. (2006). Leaving home and poverty among youth: A cross European analysis. In 2006 Conference of the European Panel Users Network, Barcelona, Spain.

  • Abello, A., & Harding, A. (2004). The dynamics of child poverty in Australia. Canberra: NATSEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011a). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011b). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. OPHI Working Paper No. 43. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998). Poverty: Difference assumptions, different profiles. Australian Social Trends, Cat. No. 4102.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2004). Survey of disability, ageing and carers, 2003—Information Paper. ABS Cat. No. 4431.0.55.001. Canberra: ABS.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005). Information paper—basic confidentialised unit record file: Survey of disability, ageing and carers 2003 (reissue) Canberra: ABS.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006a). Barriers and incentives to labour force participation. cat. no. 6239.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006b). Population distribution, aboriginal and Torres straight islander Australians, 2006 ABS Cat. No. 4705.0. 2007. Canberra: ABS.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006c). Socio-economic indexes for areas: Introduction, use and future directions Research paper 1351.0.55.015. Canberra: ABS.

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2004). Australia’s health, 2004. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2006a). Australia's health, 2006. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2006b). Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia, 2006. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2008). Australia’s health, 2008. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Treasury (2011). Building Australia’s future workforce: trained up and ready for work. Budget Reports. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Ball, T. M., & Bennett, D. M. (1999). The economic impact of breastfeeding. Pediatrics, 103(4), 870–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartick, M. & Reinhold, A. (2009). The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: A pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics, 125(5), e1048–e1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C. (1889). Labour and life of the people in London. London: Macmillian and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, B. (2003). Child poverty: A review. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, B., & Jantti, M. (1999). Child poverty accross industrialised nations, Innocenti Occasional Papers, Economic and Social Policy Series No. 71. Florence: UNICEF.

  • Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42, 851–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, T., & Zaidi, A. (2008). Disabled children, poverty and extra costs. In J. Strelitz & R. Lister (Eds.), Why money matters: Family income, povetry and childrens lives. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L., & Kalb, G. (2004). Health status and labour force particpation: Evidence from the HILDA data. Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series, no 4/04. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

  • Callander, E., Schofield, D., & Shrestha, R. (2011). Towards a holistic understanding of poverty. Health Sociology Review, in press, accepted August 2011.

  • Callander, E., Schofield, D., Shrestha, R., & Kelly, S. J. (under review). Health and functional capacity—capturing capability limitations in measures of health.

  • Callander, E. J., Schofield, D. J., Shrestha, R. N., & Kelly, S. J. (Under review). The freedom poverty measure: a way of combining health, education and income to create a multidimensional poverty measure.

  • COAG Reform Council. (2009). National education agreement: Baseline performance report for 2008. Sydney: COAG Reform Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Affairs Reference Committee. (2004). A hand up not a hand out: Renewing the fight against poverty. Senate Inquiry into Poverty 2004. Canberra: The Senate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corak, M. (2005). Principles and practicalities of measuring child poverty for rich countries, Innocenti Working Paper 2005–01. Florence: UNICEF.

  • Council of Australian Governments (2006a). COAG Communique 10 Februrary 2006. In C. o. A. Governments (Ed.).

  • Council of Australian Governments (2006b). Council of Australian Governments Meeting 10 February 2006 Communique. http://www.alga.asn.au/newsroom/communiques/01.coag/COAG_Communique_20060210.pdf: COAG.

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2006c). Human capital reform. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Council of Australian governments’ meeting 30 April 2009. Canberra: COAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1997). Equivalence scale sensitivity of poverty statistics for the member states of the European community. Review of Income and Wealth, 43(3), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drane, D. (1997). Breastfeeding and formula feeding: a preliminary economic analysis. Breastfeeding Review, 5(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and public action. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Yeung, W. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Smith, J. R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children? American Sociological Review, 63, 406–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eardley, T. (1998). Working but poor? Low pay and poverty in Australia. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economics, A. (2005). The Economic benefit of increased particpation in education and training. Melbourne: Business Council of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT. (2002). European social statisitcs: Income, poverty and social exclusion second report. Luxemborg: European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A., & Szukalska, A. (1999). Trents in child poverty in Australia: 1982 to 1995–96 Discussion Paper No. 42. Canberra: NATSEM.

  • Harding, A., & Szukalska, A. (2000). Financial disadvantage in Australia—1999: The unlucky Australians. Camperdown: The Smith Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A., Lloyd, R., & Greenwell, H. (2001a). Financial disadvantage in Australia 1990 to 2000: The persistence of poverty in a decade of growth. Camperdown: The Smith Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A., Lloyd, R., & Greenwell, H. (2001b). Financial disadvantage in Australian 1990 to 2000: The persistence of poverty in a decade of growth. Camperdown: The Smith Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, B. (2005). A framework for assessing poverty, disadvantage and low capabilties in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, B., & Wooden, M. (2005). Income, wealth and joblessness: insights from the HILDA survey Paper presented at the Sustaining Prosperity—the 2005 Melbourne Institute Economic and Social Outlook Conference, Melbourne, 31 March—1 April 2005

  • Henderson, R. F. (1975). Australian government commission of inquiry into poverty: Poverty in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S., & Hedley, D. (2003). A note on educational attainment and labour force particpation in Australia. Treasury Working Paper 2003–03. Canberra: Australian Treasury.

  • Laderchi, C. R., Saith, R., & Stewart, F. (2003). Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches. Oxford Development Studies, 31(3), 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplagne, P., Glover, M., & Shomos, A. (2007). Effects of health and education on labour force participation. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmont, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365, 1099–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. E. (1997). What money can’t buy. Harvard University Press.

  • National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. (2009). A Healthier future for all Australians—Final report of the national health and hospitals reform commission. Canberra: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, B., Payne, A., & Brown, L. (2009). Health, wealthy and wise? The relationship between health, employment and earning in Australia. AMP.NATSEM Income and Wealth Report, Issue 23, July 2009. Sydney: AMP.

  • New Zealand Ministry of Social Development (2010). Economic standard of living. The Social Report. Wellington: New Zealand Government.

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9, 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. K. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). The labour force participation of older workers: The effects of pension and early retirement schemes. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/4/31743847.pdf. Accessed May 2004.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Media Relations. (2007). OECD says governments must help people with reduced work capacity get jobs (18 Dec 2007). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (2010). Alkire Foster method: OPHI’s method for multidimensional measurement. http://www.ophi.org.uk/research/multidimensional-poverty/alkire-foster-method/. Accessed 21 May 2011.

  • Palmer, G., MacInnes, T., & Kenway, P. (2006). Monitoring poverty and social exclusion 2006. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation and New Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, N. (2005). Freedom, capabilties and the Cape York Reform Agenda. Cairns: Cape York Institute. Viewpoint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, B., & Allbon, P. (2008). The health and welfare of Australia’s aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Canberra: ABS.

    Google Scholar 

  • PovertyNet (Undated). Poverty analysis. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTPA/0,,contentMDK:20202162~pagePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:430367,00.html. Accessed 14 March 2009 2009.

  • Productivity Commission (2005). Economic Implications of an Ageing Australia. Research Report. Productivity Commission. Canberra. Canberra: Australian Government.

  • Rowntree, B. S. (1901). Poverty, a study of town life. London: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmond, C., & Crampton, P. (2001). NZDEP96—What does it measure? Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 17, 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1998a). Defining poverty and identifying the poor: Reflections on the Australia experience. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre. SPRC Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1998b). Using budget standards to assess the wellbeing of families SPRC Discussion Paper Series. Sydney: University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (2006). The costs of disability and the incidence of poverty. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre (SPRC), University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P., & Naidoo, Y. (2009). Poverty, deprivation and consistent poverty. The Economic Record, 85(271), 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P., Hill, T., & Bradbury, B. (2007a). Poverty in Australia: Sensitivity analysis and recent trends. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P., Shang, X., & Zhengang, L. (2007b). Using budget standards to estimate the costs of children: the case of Funan County. Journal of Family Studies, 13(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, D., Shrestha, R., Passey, M., Earnest, A., & Fletcher, S. (2008). Chronic disease and labour force particpation among older Australians. Medical Journal of Australia, 189(8), 447–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield D, K. S., Shrestha R, Callander E, Passey M, Percival R. (2010). Quantifying CVDs Impacts on Living Standards in Retirement’ International Journal of Cardiology, In Press.

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Inclusion Group (2011a). Helping jobless families with children. http://www.socialinclusion.gov.au/Initiatives/Pages/joblessfamilies.aspx. Accessed 17/2 2011.

  • Social Inclusion Group (2011b). Supporting children at greatest risk of long term disadvantage http://www.socialinclusion.gov.au/Initiatives/Pages/Support.aspx. Accessed 17/2 2011.

  • Social Inclusion Unit. (2009a). Social inclusion and early childhood development. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Inclusion Unit. (2009b). Social inclusion: A compendium of social indicators. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, W. (2011). Budget speech 2011–12. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P., & Abel-Smith, B. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a Survey of household resources and standards of living, 1967–1969. London: Joseph Rowntree Memorial Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsumori, K., Saunders, P., & Hughes, H. (2002). Poor arguements: A responce to the Smith Familiy report on poverty in Australia. Issue Analysis, 21, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2008). The millenium development goals report 2008. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2007). Child poverty in perspective: an overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 7 Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

  • United Nations Development Programme (1995). Human development report, 1995. Available Online: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/indices/readings/: UNDP.

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2008). Human development report 2008. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Covention on the rights of the child. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Queensland Social Research Centre. (2009). Poverty in Queensland. Brisbane: The Queensland Council of Social Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, J. (2001). The economic benefits of breastfeeding: Review and analysis. Washington DC: Food and rural economics division Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, R. (2004). The effects of disability on labour force status in Australia. The Australian Economic Review, 37(4), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). Official list of MDG indicators. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., & Burchardt, T. (2005). Comparing incomes when needs differ: equivalization for the extra costs of disability in the UK. Review of Income and Wealth, 51(1), 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study came from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) under a Dora Lush Standard Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Emily J. Callander & Deborah J. Schofield

  2. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Deborah J. Schofield & Rupendra N. Shrestha

  3. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Locked Bag 77, Camperdown, NSW, 1450, Australia

    Emily J. Callander

Authors
  1. Emily J. Callander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah J. Schofield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rupendra N. Shrestha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily J. Callander.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callander, E.J., Schofield, D.J. & Shrestha, R.N. Capacity for Freedom—A New Way of Measuring Poverty Amongst Australian Children. Child Ind Res 5, 179–198 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9122-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9122-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation