Abstract
This article is based on an evaluation of Children’s Advocacy Centers (CAC) in six municipalities in Sweden 2006–2007. The study concerned cooperation between different authorities (police, social services, public prosecutor, forensic medicine, pediatrics and child psychiatry) responsible for children who were suspected of being exposed to sexual or physical abuse. It is anticipated that use of CACs will improve the quality of investigations and that the legal process should thus be facilitated and rendered more effective. Qualitative interviews were carried out with 12 children and 22 parents at the different centers. Interviews included their experiences regarding the place and the premises, the treatment, earlier contacts with professionals, information and access to treatment and support. The results show that both children and parents appreciated the child—friendly and safe environment and the kind treatment by the staff. Information from the professionals was of crucial importance. The different processes taking place in connection with interrogation and assessments were potentially (at times) difficult to understand. It was at times difficult for the professional actors to take both the children’s, the parents’ and the families’ perspectives into consideration especially in relation to the suspected offenders. Voices from children and parents have contributed to deepened understanding about the complexity in applying a child—centered approach and a child perspective within the domain of child protection. The evaluation generated important knowledge with implications for practice and further development of Children’s advocacy centers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In English ”Children’s house”
References
Andersson, G. (1998). Barnintervju som forskningsmetod (Child interview as research method). Nordisk Psykologi, 1998, 1.
Andersson, G., & Rasmusson, B. (2006). Fosterbarns perspektiv på socialtjänstens företrädare (Foster children’s perspective on social services representatives). Social-Medicinsk Tidskrift, 1(83), 5–15.
Åström, K., & Rejmer, A. (2008). “Det blir nog bättre för barnen...” Slutrapport i utvärderingen av nationell försöksverksamhet med barnahus 2006–2007 (”It will probably be better for the children...”. Final report from the evaluation of experimental work with barnahus 2006–2007). Lund University: Research Report in Sociology of Law 2008:7.
Cederborg, A.-C. (2000). Barnintervjuer. Vägledning vid utredningsarbete (Child interviews. Guidance for investigations). Stockholm: Liber förlag.
Cross, T. P., Jones, L. M., Walsh, W. A., Simone, M., & Kolko, D. (2007). Child forensic interviewing in Children’s Advocacy Centers: empirical data on a practical model. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1031–1052.
Dahlstrand, L. (2004). Barns deltagande i familjerättsliga processer (Children's participation in family law proceedings). Uppsala University, Department of Law.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park: Sage.
Eriksson, M., Cater, Å. K., Dahlkild-Öhman, G., & Näsman, E. (Eds.). (2008). Barns röster om våld. Att tolka och förstå (Children’s voices of violence. To interpret and understand). Malmö: Gleerups.
Faller, K. C., & Palusci, V. J. (2007). Childrens advocacy centers: do they lead to positive outcomes? Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1021–1029.
Friis, E. (2008). Sociala utredningar om brottsutsatta barn (Social investigations of abused children). Lund University: Research Report in Sociology of Law 2008:5.
Gilligan, R. (2001). The importance of listening to the child in foster care. In G. Kelly & R. Gilligan (Eds.), Issues in foster care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jackson, S. J. A. (2004). USA national survey of program services provided by child advocacy centres. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 411–421.
James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (2002). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Johansson, S. (2008). Myndighetssamverkan i barnahus—organisering, innehåll och process (Collaboration between authorities in barnahus—organisation, content and process). Lund University: Research Report in Sociology of Law 2008:5.
Johansson, S. (2009). Does collaboration include or exclude? Participatory aspects of collaboration between welfare agencies when investigating suspected child abuse. In: M. Baier (Ed.) Participative aspects of law—a socio-legal perspective. Lund University: Lund Studies in Sociology of Law 31.
Jones, L. M., Cross, T. P., Walsh, W. A., & Simone, M. (2007). Do Children’s Advocacy Centers improve families’ experiences of child abuse investigations? Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1069–1085.
Lindell, C. (2005). Child physical abuse. Reports and interventions. Linköping University: Faculty of Health Sciences.
National Board of Health and Welfare. (2006). Barnahus—försöksverksamhet under ett tak—Barnahus—försöksverksamhet med samverkan under ett tak vid misstanke om brott mot barn—delrapport (Barnahus—experimental work with collaboration under one roof—interim Report). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2008). Barnahus—försöksverksamhet med samverkan under gemensamt tak vid misstanke om brott mot barn—slutrapport (Barnahus—experimental work with collaboration under one roof on cases of suspected crimes against children-final report). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2008/2008-131-14. Accessed 10 July 2010.
Neerosh, M., & Goddard, C. (2006). The truth is longer than a lie. Children’s experiences of abuse and professional interventions. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Newman, B. S., Dannenfleser, P. L., & Pendleton, D. (2005). Child abuse investigations: reasons for using Child Advocacy Centers and suggestions for improvement. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22(2), 165–181.
Nilstun, T., Gunnarsson, L., Hermeren, G., & Edlund, C. (1982). Utvärderingsforskning: modellkonstruktion, objektivitet och tvärvetenskap (Evaluation research: modelling, objectivity and interdisciplinary). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Pavlovskaia, E., & Åström, K. (2008). Rättsliga perspektiv på barnet som brottsoffer (Legal perspectives on child victims). Lund University: Research Report in Sociology of Law 2008:2.
Rasmusson, B. (2008). “Det är ju inget dagis precis...”. Barns och föräldrars upplevelser av kontakter med barnahus (“It is nothing like a daycare center...” Children’s and parents experiences of barnahus). Lund University: Research Report in Sociology of Law 2008:6.
Rejmer, A., & Hansen, H. (2008). “...känner du till skillnaden mellan sanning och lögn?” (“...do you know the difference between truth and lies?”) Lund University: Research Report in Sociology of Law 2008:5.
Reynaert, D., Bouverne-de-Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2009). A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood, 16, 518–534.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Sinclair, R. (2004). Participation in practice: making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children and Society, 18(2), 106–118.
Stern, R. (2006). The child’s right to participation—Reality or rhetoric? Uppsala University: Department of Law.
Tiller, P.-O. (1991). ´Barneperspektivet´om å se og bli sett. Vårt perspektiv på barn eller omvendt? (´Child perspective´about to see and be seen. Our perspective on children and vice versa?). Nytt fra forskning om barn i Norge, nr 1, Trondheim: Norsk Senter for barneforskning.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasmusson, B. Children’s Advocacy Centers (Barnahus) in Sweden. Child Ind Res 4, 301–321 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9094-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9094-y