Abstract
In this paper we aim to understand how the discourse of VET stakeholders (educational administrators, school leaders and vocational teachers) reproduces and/or contests gender-typical occupational practices in VET. Drawing from interviews with VET stakeholders in Estonia, we found that, as a rule, teachers and heads of schools have noticed gender segregation both in society and in the context of their own school. However, it was typically not seen as problematic. While generally holding supportive views on gender balance in occupational fields and challenging gender stereotypes in society, the respondents’ narratives tended to reproduce gender stereotypes via three different strategies: 1) attributing different abilities, dispositions and interests to male and female students and teachers; 2) emphasizing that female students were physically weaker; and 3) evoking the notion of the “breadwinner” to explain and justify why fields occupied by male students and teachers were more paid more. We argue that VET stakeholders in Estonia do not fully acknowledge the gendered nature of VET institutions or their own role in shaping gender ideologies and practices in this context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The SIHT project aimed to integrate gender perspective into teacher training and further education and to raise gender awareness of educational professionals. The project was funded by the Norwegian Grants 2009–2014 program ‘Mainstreaming Gender Equality and Promoting Work-Life Balance’.
The word for ‘nurse’ in the Estonian language literally translates as ‘medical sister‘
A direct equivalent in Estonian is ‘medical brother‘
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.
Aavik, K (2011). Eesti kutsehariduse arengukava aastateks 2009–2013 analüüs sooaspektist [The analysis of the VET development plan 2009-2013 from the gender perspective]. Tallinn: Eesti Naisuurimus- ja Teabekeskus.
Aavik, K. (2015). Intersectional Disadvantage and Privilege in the Estonian Labour Market: An Analysis of Work Narratives of Russian-Speaking Women and Estonian Men. Dissertation. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool, Rahvusvaheliste ja Sotsiaaluuringute Instituut.
Ümarik, M. (2015). Adopting Reform Policies in Vocational Education and Training: the Case of Post-Soviet Estonia. Dissertation. Tallinn: Tallinn University.
Aavik, K. (2017). Doing Neoliberalism on Campus: The Vulnerability of Gender Equality Mechanisms in Estonian Academia. Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research, (18) 1, 130–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13060/25706578.2017.18.1.353.
Aavik, K., Ümarik, M. (2019). The “exceptional male teacher” and the “vulnerable male student”: constructions of men and masculinities in vocational education and training in Estonia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1−21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1586751.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Buchmann, C., & Dalton, B. (2002). Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context. Sociology of Education, 75(2), 99-122.
Colley, K., James, D., Diment, K., & Tedder, M. (2003). Learning as becoming in vocational education and training: Class, gender and the role of vocational habitus. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(4), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200240.
Estévez-Abe, M. (2006). Gendering the varieties of capitalism. A study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial societies. World Politics, 59, 142–175.
Estonian Lifelong Learning Strategy 2020. (2014). https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/estonian_lifelong_strategy.pdf (06.11.2018).
Eurostat. (2018). Eurostat news release. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/8718272/3-07032018-BP-EN.pdf/fb402341-e7fd-42b8-a7cc-4e33587d79aa (06.11.2018).
Evans, K. (2006). Achieving equity through ‘gender autonomy’: The challenges for VET policy and practice. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(4), 393–408.
Fuller, A., Beck, V., & Unwin, L. (2005). The gendered nature of apprenticeship: Employers’ and young people’s perspectives. Education + Training, 47(4/5), 298–311.
Haridussilm. (2018). https://www.haridussilm.ee/. Accessed (06/11/2018).
Haasler, S. R., & Gottschall, K. (2015). Still a perfect model? The gender impact of vocational training in Germany, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, (67)1, 78-92.
Hillmert, S. (2015). Gender segregation in occupational expectations and in the labour market: International variation and the role of education and training systems. Gender Segregation in Vocational Education (Comparative Social Research), 31, 123-148.
Høst, H., Seland, I., & Skalholt, A. (2015). Gender policies meet VET practices – The case of health and social care in Norway. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 67(1), 109–126.
Jørgensen, C. H. (2015). Some boys’ problems in education – What is the role of VET? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 67(1), 62–77.
Kerckhoff, A. C. (1995). Institutional arrangements and stratification processes in industrial societies. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 323–347.
Kimmel, S. M. (2004). The gendered society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kreitz-Sandberg, S. (2013). Gender inclusion and horizontal gender segregation: stakeholders’ strategies and dilemmas in Swedish teachers’ education. Gender and Education.
Kütt, R., & Papp, Ü.-M. (2012). Soolist ebavõrdsust märgatakse, probleemiks ei peeta ja lahendusi ei teata – Eesti õpetajate hoiakud ja arvamused seoses soolise võrdõiguslikkusega [Gender inequality has not been regarded as a problem and no solutions are known – Estonian teachers’ perceptions of gender equality]. In Ü.-M. Papp (Ed.), Kas õpilased või poisid ja tüdrukud? Uurimus Eesti õpetajate ja haridustöötajate valmisolekust sootundlikuks õpetamiseks ja kasvatamiseks [Students or boys and girls? Study on the readiness of Estonian teachers and educational workers on gender sensitive teaching] (pp. 19–38). Tallinn: Eesti Naisteühenduste Ümarlaua Sihtasutus.
Kuurme, T., Kasemaa, G., & Roots, E.-M. (2012). Eesti haridustegelaste soodiskursus. In Ü.-M. Papp (Ed.), Kas õpilased või poisid ja tüdrukud? Uurimus Eesti õpetajate ja haridustöötajate valmisolekust sootundlikuks õpetamiseks ja kasvatamiseks [Students or boys and girls? Study on the readiness of Estonian teachers and educational workers on gender sensitive teaching] (pp. 37–40). Tallinn: Eesti Naisteühenduste Ümarlaua Sihtasutus.
Lahelma, E. (2014). Troubling discourses on gender and education. Educational Research, 56(2), 171–183.
Lappalainen, S., Mietola, R., & Lahelma, E. (2013). Gendered divisions on classed routes to vocational education. Gender and Education, 25(2), 189–205.
Ledman, K., Rosvall, P.-A., & Nylund, M. (2018). Gendered distribution of ‘knowledge required for empowerment’ in Swedish vocational education curricula? Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 70(1), 85–106.
Neudorf, E., Õun, T., Tuul, M., & Elissaar, E. (2016). Lasteaiaõpetajate arusaamad tüdrukutele ja poistele võrdsete võimaluste tagamisest [Teachers’ understandings on assuring equality for girls and boys]. In T. Kuurme & Ü.-M. Papp (Eds.), Sugu ja haridus keeles ja meeles [Gender and education in language and in the mind] (pp. 108–120). Tallinn: Eesti Naisteühenduste Ümarlaua Sihtasutus.
Pajumets, M. (2012). Post-socialist masculinities, identity work, and social change: An analysis of discursive (re)constructions of gender identity in novel social situations. Dissertation. Tallinn University.
Reisel, L., Hegna, K., & Imdorf, K. (2015). Gender segregation in vocational education: Introduction. Segregation in Vocational Education, 1–22.
Renold, E. (2006). Gendered classroom experiences. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education. London: Sage.
Scott, R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theoretical Sociology, 37, 427–442.
Smyth, E., & Steinmetz, S. (2015). Vocational training and gender segregation across Europe. Gender segregation in vocational education (Comparative Social Research), 31, 53-81.
Soolise võrdõiguslikkuse seadus [Gender Equality Act]. (2015). Riigi Teataja I, 07.07.2015, 11.
Turu-uuringute AS. (2016). Soolise võrdõiguslikkuse monitoring. Elanikkonna küsitlusuuringu raport [Gender Equality Monitor. Report on population survey]. Tallinn. https://enut.ee/files/soolise_vordoiguslikkuse_monitooringu_raport_2016.pdf. (06.11.2018).
Acknowledgements
Meril Ümarik´s work in writing this paper took place in the frame of the national research project IUT18-2 “Teachers’ professionality and professionalism in changing context (1.01.2014–31.12.2019)”, funded by the Estonian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ümarik, M., Aavik, K. Gender Segregation in Estonian Vocational Education and Training Through the Eyes of Stakeholders. Vocations and Learning 13, 197–214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09237-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09237-w