Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Inequality and Workplace Organizations: Understanding Reproduction and Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Gender

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The modern workplace is a pivotal arena for shaping societal gender inequalities. This chapter reviews theory and research on gender inequality in workplace organizations. We first provide a quick historical overview of the role of gender in the modern division of labor and present data on intersectional patterns of gender inequality in labor force participation, as well as horizontal and vertical occupational sex segregation. We then discuss prevailing theoretical explanations for these inequalities, moving from individual-level theories to structural and organizational explanations. This is followed by a review of empirical evidence on gender inequality at work, beginning with studies exploring the cultural, relational and structural mechanisms for reproducing gender inequality in organizations and moving to discussing research on mechanisms for reducing inequality. We argue that more theory and research ought to be focused on the remediation of inequality and discuss two directions: the first is an institutional theory of remediation, examining the ways in which institutional environments and actors can weaken gendered organization; and the second is a political theory focusing on the means and conditions for women to act as agents of organizational change. We conclude with suggestions for future research and theory development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www1.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/employment/jobpat-eeo1/2015/index.cfm#select_label.

References

  • Abendroth, A. K., Melzer, S., Kalev, A., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2017). Women at work: Women’s access to power and the gender earnings gap. ILR Review, 70(1), 190–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M. (2017). Pay formalization revisited: Considering the effects of manager gender and discretion on closing the gender wage gap. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbulescu, R., & Bidwell, M. (2013). Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organization Science, 24(3), 737–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. N. (1984). Organizational perspectives on stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 10(1), 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. N., Hannan, M. T., Hsu, G., & Koçak, Ö. (2007). In the company of women: Gender inequality and the logic of bureaucracy in start-up firms. Work and Occupations, 34(1), 35–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. L. E., & Nkomo, S. M. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and white women and the struggle for professional identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2016). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2007). Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, F., & De, Bakker F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, G. (2017). Organizational structures, demography and gender inequality in non-profit organization. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the ASA. Montreal (August 12–15, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., Kim, S., & Kalev, A. (2011). You can’t always get what you need: Organizational determinants of diversity programs. American Sociological Review, 76(3), 386–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., Schrage, D., & Kalev, A. (2015). Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 1014–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, L., & Thébaud, S. (2017). The effects of gendered occupational roles on men’s and women’s workplace authority: Evidence from microfinance. American Sociological Review, 82(3), 542–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. E. (2013). The care economy? Gender, economic restructuring, and job polarization in the us labor market. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 390–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a metaanalysis. Psychological bulletin, 117(1), 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. B. (2016). Working law: Courts, corporations, and symbolic civil rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 589–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., Bearak, J., Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2016). Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty? American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1161–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, E. H. (2005). Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review, 70, 702–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, S. A. (1986). A lesser life: The myth of women’s liberation in America. NY: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, E., & Lyons, C. J. (2010). Perceiving discrimination on the job: Legal consciousness, workplace context, and the construction of race discrimination. Law & Society Review, 44, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, M. L., Cohen, P. N., & Pearlman, J. (2010). Engendering change: Organizational dynamics and workplace gender desegregation, 1975–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, A. (2009). Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1591–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, A. (2014). How you downsize is who you downsize: Biased formalization, accountability, and managerial diversity. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmec, J. A. (2005). Setting occupational sex segregation in motion: Demand-side explanations of sex traditional employment. Work and Occupations, 32(3), 322–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Epstein, N., Kalev, A., Marantz, E., & Slonim, S. (2015). Integration of Arab Israeli pharmacists into the labor market. Policy Research. Taub Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, G. M. (2000). Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees’ network members. Work and Occupations, 27(4), 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 625–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2017). The economic and career effects of sexual harassment on working women. Gender & Society, 31(3), 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Tilly, C. (2001). Stories employers tell: Race, skill, and hiring in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafus, D. (2011). ‘Patches don’t have gender’: What is not open in open source software. New Media & Society, 14(4), 669–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollilainen, M., & Rothschild, J. (2001). Can self-managing teams be truly cross-functional? Gender barriers to a “new” division of labor. Research in the Sociology of Work, 10, 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatli, A., & Bell, M. P. (2011). Work-Life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal Management Reviews, 13(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padavic, I., & Reskin, B. (2002). Women and men at work. California: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlow, L. A. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 328–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plankey-Videla, N. (2005). Gendered contradictions: Managers and women workers in self-managed teams. In: Worker participation: Current research and future trends (pp 85–116). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B., & McBrier, D. B. (2000). Why not ascription? Organization employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review, 65, 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L. A., & Tilcsik, A. (2016). Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1097–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. (2007). The face of discrimiantion: How race and gender impact work and home lives. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. M. (2004). Bringing clients back in: Homophily preferences and inequality on Wall Street. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(4), 613–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, W. J. (2017). The [human resource management] revolution will not be televised: The rise and feminization of human resource management and labor force equity. Social Currents, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Doerr. L. (2004). Women’s work: Gender equality vs. hierarchy in the life sciences. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R., & Deitch, C. (1999). “I don’t feel right sized; I feel out-of-work sized” Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and the Unequal Costs of Displacement. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 446–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, K., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2012). Documenting desegregation: Racial and gender segregation in private sector employment since the Civil Rights Act. Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, K., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. (2010). Organizational approaches to inequality: Inertia, relative power, and environments. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. (2007). Opting out?: Why women really quit careers and head home. University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender & racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2003). Women of color: Their employment in the private sector. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2006). One sick child away from being fired: When “opting out” is not an option. Available http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/onesickchild.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2017.

  • Williams, C. L., Muller, C., & Kilanski, K. (2012). Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society, 26(4), 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G., Roscigno, V. J., & Huffman, M. (2015). Racial income inequality and public sector privatization. Social Problems, 62(2), 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Alexandra Kalev & Gal Deutsch

Authors
  1. Alexandra Kalev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gal Deutsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Kalev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Barbara J. Risman

  2. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, USA

    Carissa M. Froyum

  3. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    William J. Scarborough

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kalev, A., Deutsch, G. (2018). Gender Inequality and Workplace Organizations: Understanding Reproduction and Change. In: Risman, B., Froyum, C., Scarborough, W. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76332-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76333-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation