Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia and Fibula

  • Pediatric Orthopedics (B Heyworth, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia and fibula are rare conditions that share common treatment strategies. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the recent developments in treatments for both conditions.

Recent Findings

Recent literature has focused on the use of BMP and on gait analysis as a tool for measuring long-term functional outcomes. Recent study has indicated rhBMP-2 may shorten the time to initial healing of pseudoarthroses, but not guarantee bony union. Children with initial fractures before the age of four have been shown to have long-term gait outcomes that may be ultimately comparable to children with prostheses.

Summary

Both congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia and fibula are challenging conditions to treat, which require comprehensive approaches to account for both the biological and mechanical components of the conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Lovell WW, Weintstein SL, Flynn JM. Lovell and Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

  2. • Kesireddy N, Kheireldin RK, Lu A, Cooper J, Liu J, Ebraheim NA. Current treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpb.0000000000000524 Meta-analysis estabishing statistical significance across studies on congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia.

  3. Grill F, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Hefti F, Ippolito E, et al. Treatment approaches for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000;9(2):75–89.

  4. Sofield HA. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;76:33–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lloyd-Roberts GC, Shaw NE. The prevention of pseudarthrosis in congenital kyphosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1969;51(1):100–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karol LA, Haideri NF, Halliday SE, Smitherman TB, Johnston CE 2nd. Gait analysis and muscle strength in children with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: the effect of treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(3):381–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masserman RL, Peterson HA, Bianco AJ Jr. Congenital Pseudoarthosis of the tibia a review of the literature and 52 cases from the Mayo Clinic. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;99(140):140–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Badgley CE, O'Connor SJ, Kudner DF. Congenital kyphoscoliotic tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952;34-a(2):349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd HB, Sage FP. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-a(6):1245–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd HB. Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(166):5–13.

  11. Morrissy RT, Riseborough EJ, Hall JE. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1981;63-b(3):367–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Strong ML, Wong-Chung J. Prophylactic bypass grafting of the prepseudarthrotic tibia in neurofibromatosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(6):757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrissy RT. Congenital pseudoarthosis of the tibia, factors that affect results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(21):21–7.

  14. Paley D, Catagni M, Argnani F, Prevot J, Bell D, Armstrong P. Treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(280):81–93.

  15. Cho TJ, Seo JB, Kim JA, Lee DY, Yoo WJ, Chung CY, et al. Fibrous hamartoma at atrophic congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia is not osteogenic but osteoclastic. San Diego: Orthopedic Reserach Society; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seebach C, Henrich D, Tewksbury R, Wilhelm K, Marzi I. Number and proliferative capacity of human mesenchymal stem cells are modulated positively in multiple trauma patients and negatively in atrophic nonunions. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007;80(4):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-007-9020-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofmann A, Ritz U, Hessmann MH, Schmid C, Tresch A, Rompe JD, et al. Cell viability, osteoblast differentiation, and gene expression are altered in human osteoblasts from hypertrophic fracture non-unions. Bone. 2008;42(5):894–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.013.

  18. Leskela HV, Kuorilehto T, Risteli J, Koivunen J, Nissinen M, Peltonen S, et al. Congenital pseudarthrosis of neurofibromatosis type 1: impaired osteoblast differentiation and function and altered NF1 gene expression. Bone. 2009;44(2):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Granchi D, Devescovi V, Baglio SR, Leonardi E, Donzelli O, Magnani M, et al. Biological basis for the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Bone. 2010;46(3):780–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Diaz-Solano D, Wittig O, Mota JD, Cardier JE. Isolation and Characterization of multipotential mesenchymal stromal cells from congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: case report. Anat Rec (Hoboken, NJ : 2007). 2015;298(10):1804–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ofluoglu O, Davidson RS, Dormans JP. Prophylactic bypass grafting and long-term bracing in the management of anterolateral bowing of the tibia and neurofibromatosis-1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(10):2126–34. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.g.00272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boero S, Catagni M, Donzelli O, Facchini R, Frediani PV. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia associated with neurofibromatosis-1: treatment with Ilizarov’s device. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(5):675–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Royen K, Brems H, Legius E, Lammens J, Laumen A. Prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175(9):1193–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2757-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tudisco C, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixen J, Grill F, Hefti F, et al. Functional results at the end of skeletal growth in 30 patients affected by congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000;9(2):94–102.

  25. Keret D, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Grill F, Hefti F, et al. The fibula in congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000;9(2):69–74.

  26. Andersen KS. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the leg. Late results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(5):657–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bassett CA, Caulo N, Kort J. Congenital “pseudarthroses” of the tibia: treatment with pulsing electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(154):136–48.

  28. McFarland B. Pseudarthrosis of the tibia in childhood. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1951;33-b(1):36–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dobbs MB, Rich MM, Gordon JE, Szymanski DA, Schoenecker PL. Use of an intramedullary rod for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-a(6):1186–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. • Johnston CE 2nd. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: results of technical variations in the charnley-williams procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-a(10):1799–810 Examining the potenial benefits of rhBMP-2, this study contributes to the literature by evaluating the complication rates of patients treated with rhBMP-2 and patients' time to radiographic union.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Richards BS, Anderson TD. rhBMP-2 and intramedullary fixation in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(4):230–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000000789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Richards BS, Oetgen ME, Johnston CE. The use of rhBMP-2 for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(1):177–85. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.01667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vanderstappen J, Lammens J, Berger P, Laumen A. Ilizarov bone transport as a treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a long-term follow-up study. J Child Orthop. 2015;9(4):319–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-015-0675-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson DJ, Schoenecker PL, Sheridan JJ, Rich MM. Use of an intramedullary rod for the treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74(161):161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McFarland B. Birth fracture of the tibia. Br J Surg. 1939;27:706–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Charnley J. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia treated by intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-a(2):283–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Umber JS, Moss SW, Coleman SS. Surgical treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;28(166):28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  38. • Seo SG, Lee DY, Kim YS, Yoo WJ, Cho TJ, Choi IH. Foot and ankle function at maturity after Ilizarov treatment for atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a comprehensive outcome comparison with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(6):490–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stevenson DA, Little D, Armstrong L, Crawford AH, Eastwood D, Friedman JM, et al. Approaches to treating NF1 tibial pseudarthrosis: consensus from the Children’s Tumor Foundation NF1 bone abnormalities consortium. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(3):269–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31828121b8.

  40. Mathieu L, Vialle R, Thevenin-Lemoine C, Mary P, Damsin JP. Association of Ilizarov’s technique and intramedullary rodding in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Child Orthop. 2008;2(6):449–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-008-0139-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Song MH, Park MS, Yoo WJ, Cho TJ, Choi IH. Femoral overgrowth in children with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1157-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cho TJ, Choi IH, Lee SM, Chung CY, Yoo WJ, Lee DY, et al. Refracture after Ilizarov osteosynthesis in atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2008;90(4):488–93. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b4.20153.

  43. • Zhu GH, Mei HB, He RG, Liu YX, Liu K, Tang J, et al. Combination of intramedullary rod, wrapping bone grafting and Ilizarov’s fixator for the treatment of Crawford type IV congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: mid-term follow up of 56 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):443. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1295-1 By contributing a large number of CPT cases to the published literature, this study significantly enhances our understanding of outcomes following Ilizarov treatment and bone grafting.

  44. Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55(5):533–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hagan KF, Buncke HJ. Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia with free vascularized bone graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(166):34–44.

  46. Weiland AJ, Weiss AP, Moore JR, Tolo VT. Vascularized fibular grafts in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(5):654–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dormans JP, Krajbich JI, Zuker R, Demuynk M. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: treatment with free vascularized fibular grafts. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10(5):623–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tan JS, Roach JW, Wang AA. Transfer of ipsilateral fibula on vascular pedicle for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(1):72–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e318202c243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pho RWH, Levack B, Satku K, Patradul A. Free vascularized fibular graft in the treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(1):64–70.

  50. Vander Have KL, Hensinger RN, Caird M, Johnston C, Farley FA. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(4):228–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. McCarthy RE. Amputation for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Indications and techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(166):58–61.

  52. Jacobsen ST, Crawford AH, Millar EA, Steel HH. The Syme amputation in patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(4):533–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Shabtai L, Ezra E, Wientroub S, Segev E. Congenital tibial pseudarthrosis, changes in treatment protocol. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015;24(5):444–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpb.0000000000000191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shah H, Doddabasappa SN, Joseph B. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia treated with intramedullary rodding and cortical bone grafting: a follow-up study at skeletal maturity. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(1):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e318202c45d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. • Westberry DE, Carpenter AM, Tisch J, Wack LI. Amputation outcomes in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(8):e475–e81. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000001211 Focusing on the long-term outcomes of CPT patients who have undergone amputation, this retrospective study adds to the literature by describing pseudoarthrotic union rates post-amputation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Edvardsen P. Resection osteosynthesis and Boyd amputation for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1973;55(1):179–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Eilert RE, Jayakumar SS. Boyd and Syme ankle amputations in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(8):1138–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Westberry DE, Davids JR, Pugh LI. The Boyd amputation in children: indications and outcomes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(1):86–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182a007a0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. DiGiovanni CW, Ehrlich MG. Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula with interposition allograft. Orthopedics. 1998;21(11):1225–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tachdjian MO. Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics : from the Texas Scottish rite hospital for children. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2014.

  61. Tachdjian MO. Pediatric orthopedics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cho TJ, Choi IH, Chung CY, Yoo WJ, Lee SH, Lee SH, et al. Isolated congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula: clinical course and optimal treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(4):449–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpo.0000226273.85953.dd.

  63. Dal Monte A, Donzelli O, Sudanese A, Baldini N. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7(1):14–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Goh JC, Mech AM, Lee EH, Ang EJ, Bayon P, Pho RW. Biomechanical study on the load-bearing characteristics of the fibula and the effects of fibular resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(279):223–8.

  65. Lambert KL. The weight-bearing function of the fibula. A strain gauge study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(3):507–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dooley BJ, Menelaus MB, Paterson DC. Congenital pseudarthrosis and bowing of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1974;56-b(4):739–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Martus JE, Johnston CE 2nd. Isolated congenital pseudoarthrosis of the fibula: a comparison of fibular osteosynthesis with distal tibiofibular synostosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(8):825–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31818e192d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Langenskiold A. Pseudarthrosis of the fibula and progressive valgus defformity of the ankle in children: treatment by fusion of the distal tibial and fibular metaphyses. Review of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49(3):463–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Merkel KD, Peterson HA. Isolated congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula: report of a case and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;4(1):100–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Makin M. Tibio-fibular relationship in paralysed limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1965;47:500–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Paluska DJ, Blount WP. Ankle valgus after the Grice subtalar stabilization: the late evaluation of a personal series with a modified technic. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;59:137–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hsu LC, O'Brien JP, Yau AC, Hodgson AR. Valgus deformity of the ankle in children with fibular pseudarthrosis. Results of treatment by bone-grafting of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(3):503–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wiltse LL. Valgus deformity of the ankle: a sequel to acquired or congenital abnormalities of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(3):595–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yang KY, Lee EH. Isolated congenital pseudoarthrosis of the fibula. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002;11(4):298–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Narasimhan RR, Banta JV. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula. Orthopedics. 2001;24(5):499–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Rathjen KE, Birch JG. Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children. In: Beaty JH, editor. Rockwood and Wilkins' fractures in children. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 92–119.

  77. Ng BK, Saleh M. Fibula pseudarthrosis revisited treatment with Ilizarov apparatus: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10(3):234–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carley B. Vuillermin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Katherine Eisenberg declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Carley Vuillermin declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

 Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatric Orthopedics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eisenberg, K.A., Vuillermin, C.B. Management of Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia and Fibula. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12, 356–368 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09566-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09566-2

Keywords

Navigation