Erratum to: ann. behav. med.
DOI 10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
In “Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review,” (Volume 43, Number 1, February 2012, pp. 101–116, doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7) the effect size for Rothman et al. (1993 [70]) study 2 should be reported as r = .06 (95 % CI = −.15, .23) in Table 1. The summary effect size for the 2 studies of skin cancer prevention behavior should be reported as marginally significant, r = .15 (p = .054; 95 % CI = −.00, .289) in Table 3 and on p. 109. The meta-analysis’ main finding of an overall effect size for framing on prevention behavior remains significant, and should be reported as r = .075 (p = .003; 95 % CI = .03, .13) in Table 2 and on pp. 101, 109, and 111; the fail-safe N for this finding is 166 (p. 110). All other findings remain unchanged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7.
About this article
Cite this article
Gallagher, K.M., Updegraff, J.A. Erratum to: Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors: A Meta-analytic Review. ann. behav. med. 46, 127 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9446-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9446-6