Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motivation and Physiologic Responses of Playing a Physically Interactive Video Game Relative to a Sedentary Alternative in Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

While there is emerging research outlining the physiologic cost of the physically interactive Nintendo Wii, there are no evaluations of the relative reinforcing value (RRV) of the Wii versus a sedentary alternative.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the physiologic cost, RRV, and liking of playing Wii Sports Boxing (Wii) versus a traditional sedentary video game (SVG) in 11 lean and 13 overweight/obese 8- to 12-year-old children.

Methods

Heart rate (HR) and VO2 were assessed during rest, treadmill walking, and playing an SVG and Wii using a counterbalance design. Liking was assessed during treadmill walking and video game play. RRV was assessed for Wii versus SVG.

Results

Average HR, VO2, and liking were significantly greater for Nintendo Wii (p ≤ 0.001 for all) than all other conditions. Lean children displayed a greater (p < 0.001) peak responding for access to Wii relative to the SVG while overweight/obese children did not (p ≥ 0.16).

Conclusion

Wii was a well-liked activity of greater physiologic intensity than both the SVG and treadmill walking. Lean children were more motivated while overweight/obese children were equally as motivated to play Wii relative to the SVG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roberts DF, Foehr UG, Rideout V. Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Available at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/Generation-M-Media-in-the-Lives-of-8-18-Year-olds-Report.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2008

  2. Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Robinson JL, et al. A randomized trial of the effects of reducing television viewing and computer use on body mass index in young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008; 162(3): 239–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson TN. Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999; 282(16): 1561–1567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gortmaker SL, Must A, Sobol AM, Peterson K, Colditz GA, Dietz WH. Television viewing as a cause of increasing obesity among children in the United States, 1986–1990. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996; 150(4): 356–362.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong CA, Sallis JF, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, McKenzie TL, Hovell MF. Children's television viewing, body fat, and physical fitness. Am J Health Promot. 1998; 12(6): 363–368.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crespo CJ, Smit E, Troiano RP, Bartlett SJ, Macera CA, Andersen RE. Television watching, energy intake, and obesity in US children: Results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155(3): 360–365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DuRant RH, Baranowski T, Johnson M, Thompson WO. The relationship among television watching, physical activity, and body composition of young children. Pediatrics. 1994; 94(4): 449–455.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Straker L, Abbott R. Effect of screen-based media on energy expenditure and heart rate in 9- to 12-year-old children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007; 19(4): 459–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanningham-Foster L, Jensen TB, Foster RC, et al. Energy expenditure of sedentary screen time compared with active screen time for children. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(6): e1831–e1835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sell K, Lillie T, Taylor J. Energy expenditure during physically interactive video game playing in male college students with different playing experience. J Am Coll Health. 2008; 56(5): 505–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mellecker RR, McManus AM. Energy expenditure and cardiovascular responses to seated and active gaming in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008; 162(9): 886–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graves L, Stratton G, Ridgers ND, Cable NT. Energy expenditure in adolescents playing new generation computer games. Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42(7): 592–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graves LE, Ridgers ND, Stratton G. The contribution of upper limb and total body movement to adolescents' energy expenditure whilst playing Nintendo Wii. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008; 104(4): 617–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barkley JE, Penko A. Physiologic responses, perceived exertion, and hedonics of playing a physical interactive video game relative to a sedentary alternative and treadmill walking in adults. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2009; 12(3): 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, Jensen TB, Mitre N, Levine JA. Activity-promoting video games and increased energy expenditure. J Pediatr. 2009; 154(6): 819–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Craig S, Goldberg J, Dietz WH. Psychosocial correlates of physical activity among fifth and eighth graders. Prev Med. 1996; 25(5): 506–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Motl RW, Dishman RK, Saunders R, Dowda M, Felton G, Pate RR. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21(2): 110–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DiLorenzo TM, Stucky-Ropp RC, Vander Wal JS, Gotham HJ. Determinants of exercise among children. II. A longitudinal analysis. Prev Med. 1998; 27(3): 470–477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roemmich JN, Barkley JE, Lobarinas CL, Foster JH, White TM, Epstein LH. Association of liking and reinforcing value with children's physical activity. Physiol Behav. 2008; 93(4–5): 1011–1018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berridge KC. Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996; 20(1): 1–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Epstein LH, Smith JA, Vara LS, Rodefer JS. Behavioral economic analysis of activity choice in obese children. Health Psychol. 1991; 10(5): 311–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein LH, Truesdale R, Wojcik A, Paluch RA, Raynor HA. Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food. Physiol Behav. 2003; 78(2): 221–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: An incentive-sensitization view. Addiction. 2000; 95(Suppl 2): S91–S117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hyman SE, Malenka RC. Addiction and the brain: The neurobiology of compulsion and its persistence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(10): 695–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Centers for Disease Control. BMI percentile calculator for child and teen. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/dnpabmi/. Accessed September 1, 2008.

  26. Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Nieman DC, Kang J. Children's OMNI scale of perceived exertion: Walking/running evaluation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(1): 139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lanningham-Foster LM, Jensen TB, McCrady SK, Nysse LJ, Foster RC, Levine JA. Laboratory measurement of posture allocation and physical activity in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(10): 1800–1805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baum WM. On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(1): 231–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baum WM. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979; 32(2): 269–281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pierce WD, Epling WF. Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. BehavAnalyst. 1983; 6: 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Carroll ME. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: A theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 153(1): 44–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Epstein LH KC, Consalvi AR, Paluch RA. Reinforcing value of physical activity as a determinant of child activity level. Health Psychol. 1999; 18(6): 599–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc. 1995; 57(1): 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Trost SG, Pate RR, Sallis JF, et al. Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(2): 350–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Corbin CB, Pangrazi RP. Guidelines for appropriate physical activity for elementary school children 2003 update. Reston: NASPE; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Buchner DM, Bishop J, Brown DR, et al. 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Epstein LH, Beecher MD, Graf JL, Roemmich JN. Choice of interactive dance and bicycle games in overweight and nonoverweight youth. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33(2): 124–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116(9): 1081–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Exercise Leisure and Sport, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44240, USA

    Amanda L. Penko M.A. & Jacob E. Barkley Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Amanda L. Penko M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob E. Barkley Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda L. Penko M.A..

About this article

Cite this article

Penko, A.L., Barkley, J.E. Motivation and Physiologic Responses of Playing a Physically Interactive Video Game Relative to a Sedentary Alternative in Children. ann. behav. med. 39, 162–169 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9164-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9164-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation