Skip to main content
Log in

Automated striatal uptake analysis of 18F-FDOPA PET images applied to Parkinson’s disease patients

  • Original article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

6-[18F]Fluoro-l-DOPA (FDOPA) is a radiopharmaceutical valuable for assessing the presynaptic dopaminergic function when used with positron emission tomography (PET). More specifically, the striatal-to-occipital ratio (SOR) of FDOPA uptake images has been extensively used as a quantitative parameter in these PET studies. Our aim was to develop an easy, automated method capable of performing objective analysis of SOR in FDOPA PET images of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients.

Methods

Brain images from FDOPA PET studies of 21 patients with PD and 6 healthy subjects were included in our automated striatal analyses. Images of each individual were spatially normalized into an FDOPA template. Subsequently, the image slice with the highest level of basal ganglia activity was chosen among the series of normalized images. Also, the immediate preceding and following slices of the chosen image were then selected. Finally, the summation of these three images was used to quantify and calculate the SOR values. The results obtained by automated analysis were compared with manual analysis by a trained and experienced image processing technologist.

Results

The SOR values obtained from the automated analysis had a good agreement and high correlation with manual analysis. The differences in caudate, putamen, and striatum were −0.023, −0.029, and −0.025, respectively; correlation coefficients 0.961, 0.957, and 0.972, respectively.

Conclusions

We have successfully developed a method for automated striatal uptake analysis of FDOPA PET images. There was no significant difference between the SOR values obtained from this method and using manual analysis. Yet it is an unbiased time-saving and cost-effective program and easy to implement on a personal computer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kish SJ, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O. Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: pathophysiologic and clinical implications. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:876–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garnett ES, Firnau G, Nahmias C. Dopamine visualized in the basal ganglia of living man. Nature. 1983;305:137–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nahmias C, Garnett ES, Firnau G, Lang A. Striatal dopamine distribution in parkinsonian patients during life. J Neurol Sci. 1985;69:223–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leenders KL, Palmer AJ, Quinn N, Clark JC, Firnau G, Garnett ES, et al. Brain dopamine metabolism in patients with Parkinson’s disease measured with positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49:853–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrish PK, Sawle GV, Brooks DJ. An [18F]dopa-PET and clinical study of the rate of progression in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1996;119:585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takikawa S, Dhawan V, Chaly T, Robeson W, Dahl R, Zanzi I, et al. Input functions for 6-[fluorine-18]fluorodopa quantitation in parkinsonism: comparative studies and clinical correlations. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:955–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishikawa T, Dhawan V, Chaly T, Margouleff C, Robeson W, Dahl JR, et al. Clinical significance of striatal DOPA decarboxylase activity in Parkinson’s disease. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:216–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikawa T, Dhawan V, Kazumata K, Chaly T, Mandel F, Neumeyer J, et al. Comparative nigrostriatal dopaminergic imaging with iodine-123-βCIT-FP/SPECT and fluorine-18-FDOPA/PET. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1760–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhawan V, Ma Y, Pillai V, Spetsieris P, Chaly T, Belakhlef A, et al. Comparative analysis of striatal FDOPA uptake in Parkinson’s disease: ratio method versus graphical approach. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1324–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eshuis SA, Maguire RP, Leenders KL, Jonkman S, Jager PL. Comparison of FP-CIT SPECT with F-DOPA PET in patients with de novo and advanced Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:200–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eshuis SA, Jager PL, Maguire RP, Jonkman S, Dierckx RA, Leenders KL. Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:454–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jokinen P, Helenius H, Rauhala E, Brück A, Eskola O, Rinne JO. Simple ratio analysis of 18F-fluorodopa uptake in striatal subregions separates patients with early Parkinson disease from healthy controls. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:893–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang WS, Chiang YH, Lin JC, Chou YH, Cheng CY, Liu RS. Crossover study of 99mTc-TRODAT-1 SPECT and 18F-FDOPA PET in Parkinson’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:999–1005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline J-B, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp. 1995;2:165–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashburner J, Neelin P, Collins DL, Evans A, Friston KJ. Incorporating prior knowledge into image registration. Neuroimage. 1997;6:344–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;7:254–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao CH, Hsu WL, Xie HL, Lin MC, Lan WC, Chao HY. GMP production of [18F]FDOPA and issues concerning its quality analyses as in USP “Fluorodopa F 18 injection”. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25:309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyer JH, Gunn RN, Myers R, Grasby PM. Assessment of spatial normalization of PET ligand images using ligand-specific templates. Neuroimage. 1999;9:545–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gispert JD, Pascau J, Reig S, Martínez-Lázaro R, Molina V, García-Barreno P, et al. Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans. Neuroimage. 2003;19:601–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G. Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory. In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, Di Paolo R, editors. Information processing in medical imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995. p. 263–74.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Studholme C, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognit. 1999;32:71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference; 1993. p. 1813–7.

  23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Habraken JB, Booij J, Slomka P, Sokole EB, van Royen EA. Quantification and visualization of defects of the functional dopaminergic system using an automatic algorithm. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1091–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Radau PE, Linke R, Slomka PJ, Tatsch K. Optimization of automated quantification of 123I-IBZM uptake in the striatum applied to parkinsonism. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:220–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buchert R, Berding G, Wilke F, Martin B, von Borczyskowski D, Mester J, et al. IBZM tool: a fully automated expert system for the evaluation of IBZM SPECT studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1073–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zubal IG, Early M, Yuan O, Jennings D, Marek K, Seibyl JP. Optimized, automated striatal uptake analysis applied to SPECT brain scans of Parkinson’s disease patients. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:857–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirzaei S, Zakavi R, Rodrigues M, Schwarzgruber T, Brücke T, Bakala J, et al. Fully automated 3D basal ganglia activity measurement in dopamine transporter scintigraphy (Spectalyzer). Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seibyl JP. Single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography evaluations of patients with central motor disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:274–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:310–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Shin-Yuan Chen and Ms. Li-Chuan Huang for providing the clinical information of PD patients and the MR imaging related parameters, respectively. This study was supported by a grant TCRD 99-27 from the Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Hao K. Kao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, IC., Lue, KH., Hsieh, HJ. et al. Automated striatal uptake analysis of 18F-FDOPA PET images applied to Parkinson’s disease patients. Ann Nucl Med 25, 796–803 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0533-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0533-8

Keywords

Navigation