Summary
The principle of eclecticism is discussed with the point of departure in a definition of psychology and its subject areas. It is argued that eclecticism constitutes one of the key developmental conditions for science. The argument begins with an analysis of the distinction between real and recognized object and concludes that a scientific object always has an infinite number of aspects and that this fact is not reducible to a question of complexity. Next a differentiation between theoretical levels based on ontological arguments are introduced and it is concluded that it is necessary to accept positive eclectic processes in theories, and that development of theories is due to an eclectic relationship with other theories. A series of examples are given for different versions of the eclectic development of psychological disciplines and concepts, namely phenomenology, psychoanalysis, stress, and cognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, M. (1994). Eklektik. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann.
Althusser, L. (1972). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: a reader (pp. 86–112). London: Blackwell. 2006.
Althusser, L. (1975). Philosophy and the spontaneous philosophy of the scientists & other essays. London: Verso Books. 1990.
Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1970). Reading capital. London: Verso. 2009.
Andkjær Olsen, A., & Køppe, S. (1996). Psykoanalysen efter Freud Bd. I og II. København: Gyldendal.
Bertalanffy, L. (1975). Perspectives on general system theory. New York: G. Braziller.
Bunge, M. (1969). The metaphysics, epistemology and methodology of levels. In L. Whyte (Ed.), Hierarchical structures (pp. 17–29). New York: American Elsevier.
Bunge, M. (1977). Furniture of the world. Ontology I. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Buzzoni, M. (2001). The operationalistic and hermeneutic status of psychoanalysis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 32, 131–165.
Collin, F., & Guldmann, F. (2005). Meaning, use, and truth: introducing the philosophy of language. London: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: A Grosset/Putnam book.
Dewdney, A. K. (1987). Computer recreations. Scientific American, august: 8–14.
Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Emergence and the ontology of levels Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28, 83–119.
Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Levels, emergence and three versions of downward causation. In P. Bøgh Andersen, C. Emmeche, N. Finnemann, & P. Voetmann Christiansen (Eds.), Downward causation—minds, bodies and matter (pp. 13–35). Århus: Århus University Press.
Engelsted, N., & Køppe, S. (1994). Placing Copenhagen psychology on the map. Psychological Yearbook, 1, 9–27.
Gardner, H. (1985). The minds new science. New York: Basic Books.
Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 42, 266–290.
Gregersen, F. (2000). God og dårlig eklekticisme. Motskrift, 1, 3–17.
Gregersen, F., & Køppe, S. (1988). Against epistemological relativism. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 19, 447–487.
Gregersen, F., & Køppe, S. (1989). A normative theory of humanistic knowledge. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XX, 1, 40–53.
Helles, R. & Køppe, S (2011). Qualitative methods. Submitted.
Kagan, J. (2009). The three cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, D. (2002). The Descent of Ideas. Cornwall: Ashgate.
Kohut, H. (1985). Self psychology and the humanities. New York: Norton.
Køppe, S. (1983). The psychology of the neuron - Freud, Cajal and Golgi. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 24(1), 1–12.
Køppe, S. (2007). The Freudian unconscious in the context of the cognitive orientation. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 29(2), 125–127.
Køppe, S. (2009). Neurosis: aspects of its conceptual development in the nineteenth century. History of Psychiatry, 20(1), 27–46.
Kuhn, T. (1969). Postscript 1969. In The structure of scientific revolutions Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1969). The methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Liedmann, S. E. (1977). Das Spiel der Gegensätze: Friedrich Engels Philosophie und die Wissenschaften des 19. Jahrhunderts. Campus: Berlin.
Madsen, K. B. (1986). Psykologi 1–2. København: Gyldendal.
Mammen, J. (1983). Den menneskelige sans: et essay om psykologiens genstandsområde. Dansk psykologisk Forlag.
Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J.-M. (Eds.). (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Putnam, H. (1997). Realism and reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwarz, M. (2009). Is psychology based on a methodological error? Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 43, 185–213.
Selye, H. (1952). The story of the adaptation syndrome. Montreal: Acta, Inc.
Toomela, A. (2008). Variables in psychology: a critique of quantitative psychology integrative psychological and behavioral science, 42, 245–265.
Varela, F. J. (1999). The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In J. Petitot (Ed.), Naturalizing phenomenology (pp. 266–317). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Watzlawik, M. (2009). Der Weisheits letzter Schluss? Wisdom’s last conclusion? Commentary on “Is Psychology Based on a Methodological Error?” by Michael Schwarz. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 43, 214–220.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1981). Robustness, reliability and overdetermination. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences. London: Jossey-Bass.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1994). The ontology of complex systems: levels of organization, perspectives, and causal thickets. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20, 207–274.
Yurevich, A. V. (2009). Cognitive frames in psychology: demarcations and ruptures. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 43(2), 89–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Køppe, S. A Moderate Eclecticism: Ontological and Epistemological Issues. Integr. psych. behav. 46, 1–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9175-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9175-6