Abstract
In modern Indian political discourse the custom of dowry is often represented as the cause of serious social problems, including the neglect of daughters, sex-selective abortion, female infanticide, and the harassment, abuse, and murder of brides. Attempts to deal with these problems through legislative prohibition of dowry, however, have resulted in virtually no diminution of either dowry or violence against women. In contrast, radically different interpretations of dowry can be found in the literatures of structural-functionalist anthropology, economics, and human behavioral ecology which muster wide-ranging forms of qualitative and quantitative evidence to support functional models of dowry as a form of inheritance or investment in daughters and/or their children. This paper argues that a functionalist perspective on dowry could lead to improved dowry policy, and that an approach based in human behavioral ecology (HBE) is uniquely suited to this task. After reviewing the relevant literature on dowry in South Asia, I discuss current dowry legislation and its limitations. I then develop a behavioral ecology model of Indian dowry and test it with quantitative and qualitative data. I conclude that if dowry legislation is to achieve broad support or bring about effective social change, it must address and support the positive motivations for and effects of dowry and take a targeted approach to dowry violence, which is not uniformly distributed across regions, castes, or social classes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basu, M. (2001). Hindu women and marriage law: From sacrament to contract. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bernard, H. (1995). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
Bhat, P. N. M. (2002). Returning a favor: reciprocity between female education and fertility in India. World Development, 30, 1791–1803.
Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Botticini, M., & Siow, A. (2003). Why dowries? American Economic Review, 93, 1385–1398.
Caldwell, J. C. (2005). On net intergenerational wealth flows: An update. Population and Development Review, 31, 721–740.
Caldwell, B. K., & Caldwell, J. C. (2003). Below-replacement fertility: Determinants and prospects in South Asia. Journal of Population Research, 20, 19–34.
Caldwell, J., Reddy, P., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37, 343–361.
Caplan, L. (1983). Bridegroom price in urban India: Class, caste, and “dowry evil” among christians in Madras. Man, 19, 216–233.
Dalmia, S., & Lawrence, P. G. (2005). The institution of dowry in India: Why it continues to prevail. Journal of Developing Areas, 38, 71–93.
Das Gupta, M. (1997). Socio-economic status and clustering of child deaths in Rural Punjab. Population Studies, 51, 191–202.
Das Gupta, M., & Bhat, P. N. M. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51, 307–315.
Dhesi, A. S. (2002). Expected life-earnings paths with and without higher education: The case of India. International Review of Applied Economics, 16, 417–433.
Dickemann, M. (1979). The ecology of mating systems in hypergynous dowry societies. Social Science Information, 18, 163–195.
Diwan, P., & Diwan, P. (1995). Dowry and protection to married women (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications.
Drèze, J., & Murthi, M. (2001). Fertility, education, and development: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 27, 33–63.
Edlund, L. (2006). The price of marriage: Net vs gross flows and the South Asian dowry debate. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 542–551.
Gaulin, S., & Boster, J. (1990). Dowry as female competition. American Anthropologist, 92, 994–1005.
Goody, J. (1976). Production and reproduction: A comparative study of the domestic domain. Cambridge studies in Social Anthropology 17. Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J., & Tambiah, S. J. (1973). Bridewealth and dowry. Cambridge papers in Social Anthropology 7. Cambridge University Press.
Government of India (1940–1945). Statistical abstract for British India. Department of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics, Dominion of India. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India.
Government of India (1946–1957). Statistical abstract. Office of the Economic Advisor, Dominion of India. Delhi: Manager of Publications, Government of India.
Government of India (1958–2002). Statistical abstract. Central Statistical Organization, Department of Statistics, Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India. Delhi: Manager of Publications, Government of India.
Harrell, S. (1997). Human families. Boulder: Westview Press.
Harrell, S., & Dickey, S. A. (1985). Dowry systems in complex societies. Ethnology, 24, 105–120.
Kapadia, K. (1995). Siva and her sisters: Gender, caste, and class in rural South India. Boulder: Westview.
Kaplan, H. S. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 39, 91–135.
Kaplan, H. S., & Lancaster, J. B. (2000). Skills-based competitive labor markets, the demographic transition, and the interaction of fertility and parental human capital in the determination of child outcomes. In L. Cronk, N. A. Chagnon, & W. Irons (Eds.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 283–322). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kingdon, G. G., & Unni, J. (2001). Education and women’s labour market outcomes in India. Education Economics, 9, 173–195.
Kishor, S. (1993). “May god give sons to all”: Gender and child mortality in India. American Sociological Review, 58, 247–265.
Kishwar, M. (2005a). Beginning with our own lives: A call for dowry boycott. In S. Basu (Ed.), Dowry and inheritance (pp. 265–267). New Delhi: Women Unlimited (originally published in 1980).
Kishwar, M. (2005b). Rethinking dowry boycott. In S. Basu (Ed.), Dowry and inheritance (pp. 268–278). New Delhi: Women Unlimited (originally published in 1988).
Kumari, R. (1989). Brides are not for burning. Delhi: Radiant Publishers.
Mace, R. (1998). The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 353, 389–397.
Mace, R. (2000). An adaptive model of human reproductive rate where wealth is inherited: Why people have small families. In L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, & W. Irons (Eds.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 261–282). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Malhotra, A., Vanneman, R., & Kishor, S. (1995). Fertility, dimensions of patriarchy, and development in India. Population and Development Review, 21, 281–305.
Miller, B. D. (1981). Endangered sex: Neglect of female children in rural North India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Miller, B. D. (2001). Female-selective abortion in Asia: Patterns, policies, and debates. American Anthropologist, 103, 1083–1095.
Oldenburg, V. T. (2002). Dowry murder: The imperial origins of a cultural crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
Palriwala, R. (1989). Reaffirming the anti-dowry struggle. Economic and Political Weekly, 24, 942–944.
Paul, M. C. (1985). Dowry and position of women in India: A study of Delhi metropolis. New Delhi: Inter-India Publications.
Prasad, B. D. (1994). Dowry-related violence: A content analysis of news in selected newspapers. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25, 71–89.
Rao, V. (1993). Dowry “inflation” in rural India: A statistical investigation. Population Studies, 47, 283–293.
Rao, V. (1998). Wife-abuse, its causes and its impact on intra-household resource allocation in rural Karnataka: A “participatory” econometric analysis. In M. Krishnaraj, R. M. Sudarshan, & A. Shariff (Eds.), Gender, population, and development (pp. 94-121). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Samuel, E. (2002). Dowry and dowry harassment in India: An assessment based on modified capitalist patriarchy. African and Asian Studies, 1, 187–229.
Sharma, U. (1993). Dowry in North India: Its consequences for women. In P. Uberoi (Ed.), Family, kinship and marriage in India (pp. 341–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheel, R. (1999). The political economy of dowry: Institutionalization and expansion in North India. New Delhi: Manohar.
Shenk, M. K. (2004). Embodied capital and heritable wealth in complex cultures: A class-based analysis of parental investment in urban South India. Research in Economic Anthropology, 23, 307–333.
Shenk, M. K. (2005a). Kin networks in wage-labor economies: Effects on child and marriage market outcomes. Human Nature, 16, 81–114.
Shenk, M. K. (2005b). How much gold will you put on your daughter? A behavioral ecology perspective on dowry marriage. University of Washington Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology (CSDE) working paper series, publication 05–07.
Srinivas, M. N. (1984). Some reflections on dowry. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Srinivasan, P., & Lee, G. R. (2004). The dowry system in Northern India: Women’s attitudes and social change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1108–1117.
Suran, L., Amin, S. Huq, L., & Chowdury, K. (2004). Does dowry improve life for brides? A test of the Bequest theory of dowry in rural Bangladesh. Population Council Policy Research Division working paper series no. 195.
Thakur, H. (1998a). Preface. In W. Menski (Ed.), South Asians and the dowry problem (pp. xiii–xxi). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
Thakur, H. (1998b). Practical steps towards eradicating dowry and bride-burning in India. In W. Menski (Ed.), South Asians and the dowry problem (pp. 209–220). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
Van Willigen, J., & Channa, V. C. (1991). Law, custom, and crimes against women: The problem of dowry death in India. Human Organization, 50, 369–377.
Uberoi, P. (1994). Family, kinship and marriage in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Yadava, K. N. S., & Yadava, S. S. (1999). Women’s status and fertility in rural India. History of the Family, 4, 209–228.
Acknowledgment
Data collection and ethnographic research for this article were funded by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant, award ID no. BCS-0001523. My current support comes from a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship, no. F32 HD048064, from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. I would like to thank the following for advice, comments, or information that aided me with this paper: Eric Alden Smith, Donna Leonetti, Tom Mroz, Stevan Harrell, G. K. Karanth, Gayathri Devi, and Sangeetha V.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shenk, M.K. Dowry and Public Policy in Contemporary India. Hum Nat 18, 242–263 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9006-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9006-0