Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

School Resource Officers and the School to Prison Pipeline: Discovering Trends of Expulsions in Public Schools

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public school systems in America have come under scrutiny due to the harsh treatment of students by School Resource Officers (SROs). Incidents of armed, uniformed police in schools affecting physical arrests in American classrooms seem to be ever more frequent in news cycles, likely due to the ease of capturing these events on video via cell phones of bystanders. Of particular note, visceral reports of “heavy-handed” SROs reinforce a consistent narrative from some media outlets suggesting that the simple presence of these officers inside schools leads to student arrests for behaviors that can arguably be dealt with by the school administration in a reintegrative manner. The apparent lack of school discretion and the presence of strict zero tolerance policies are at the root of an issue that has been termed the “School to Prison Pipeline” by mass media. SROs are often the exclusive focus of this issue, typically as a symbol of a school’s dedication to strict enforcement of rigid rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sample size has been rounded to the nearest 10 in accordance to the security guidelines of the SSOCS restricted dataset.

  2. Note - each of these characteristics were reported by the principal of each school. For example, percentage of students with limited English proficiency asked principals, “What percentage of your current students fit the following criteria? Limited English Proficient (LEP).” It is presumed that each principal is reporting these values in a manner that is nationally recognized. See the methodology section of the School Survey on Crime and Safety for more information.

  3. In other words, average percent of students present on a daily basis.

References

  • Borum, R., Cornell, D., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. (2010). What can be done about school shootings?: A review of the evidence. Mental Health Law and Policy, 39(1): 27–37.

  • Brotherton, D. C. (1996). The contradictions of suppression: Notes from a study of approaches to gangs in three public high schools. The Urban Review, 28(2), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, C. M. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality, 13(2), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer v. State, 275 S.E. 2d774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1980).

  • Gagnon, D., Jaffee, E. M., & Kennedy, R. (2016). Exclusionary Discipline Highest in New Hampshire’s Urban Schools Suspension and Expulsion Found to Disproportionately Affect Disadvantaged Students. URL: http://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=carsey. Last accessed: August 1, 2017.

  • Giroux, H. A. (2003). Racial injustice and disposable youth in the age of zero tolerance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(4), 553–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitzeg, N. A. (2009). Education or incarceration: Zero tolerance policies and the school to prison pipeline. Forum on Public Policy, 2, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfield, P. J. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12(79), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. (2006). Schooling Miranda: Policing Interrogation in the Twenty-First Century Schoolhouse. Loyola Law Review, 52, 39–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, I. A., & Perone, D. C. (1998). The other side of school violence: Educator policies and practices that may contribute to student misbehavior. Journal of School Psychology, 36(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • In Interest of Thomas B.D., 486 S.E.2d 498 (S.C. Ct. App. 1997).

  • Insley, A. C. (2001). Suspending and expelling children from educational opportunity: Time to reevaluate zero tolerance policies. American University Law Review, 50(4), 1039–1074.

  • Jennings, W. G., Khey, D. N., Maskaly, J., & Donner, C. M. (2011). Evaluating the relationship between law enforcement and school security measures and violent crime in schools. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 11(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006). The new American school: Preparation for post-industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(5), 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, L., & Moretti, E. (2004). The effect of education on crime: Evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. The American Economic Review, 94(1), 155–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopera v. Town of Coventry, 640 F.3d 388 (1st Cir. 2011).

  • May, D. C., Barranco, R., Stokes, E., Robertson, A. A., & Haynes, S. H. (2015). Do school resource officers really refer juveniles to the juvenile justice system for less serious offenses? Criminal Justice Policy Review. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0887403415610167. Last accessed: August 1, 2017.

  • Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAACP. (2016). Criminal justice fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.naacp.org/criminal-justice-fact-sheet/.

  • National Association of School Resource Officers. (2016). Home page. Retrieved from https://nasro.org/.

  • People v. Bowers, 356 N.Y.S.2d 432 (App. Div. 1974).

  • People v. Dilworth, 661 N.E.2d 310 (Ill. 1996).

  • Price, P. (2009). When is a police officer an officer of the law? The status of police officers in schools. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(2), 541–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocque, M. (2010). Office discipline and student behavior: Does race matter? American Journal of Education, 116(4), 557–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools? The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(5), 372–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State v. Tywayne H., 933 P.2d 251 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997).

  • Suh, S., & Suh, J. (2007). Risk factors and levels of risk for high school dropouts. Professional School Counseling, 10(3), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzzolo, E., & Hewitt, D. T. (2006). Rebuilding inequality: The re-emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90(2), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Public school safety and discipline: 2013–14. Washington, D.C. URL: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015051.pdf. Last accessed: August 1, 2017

  • Yim, C. Y. (2012). Policing school discipline. Brooklyn Law Review, 77(3), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifler, R., & De Beers, J. (2002). The children left behind: How zero tolerance impacts our most vulnerable youth. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 8, 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David N. Khey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pigott, C., Stearns, A.E. & Khey, D.N. School Resource Officers and the School to Prison Pipeline: Discovering Trends of Expulsions in Public Schools. Am J Crim Just 43, 120–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9412-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9412-8

Keywords

Navigation