Skip to main content
Log in

Litigation and School Resource Officers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this paper was to review school discipline litigation involving school resource officers. Specifically, the authors sought to determine whether the courts have found school resource officers to be acting within the parameters of their job.

Method

Authors searched Nexus Uni and Google Scholar to identify cases that matched the inclusion criteria. The search produced 44 cases, and cases were coded and examined to identify patterns in litigation involving school resource officers.

Results

Results of this case law review found the most common violations involved the fourth (n = 29), fifth (n = 14), and fourteenth amendments (n = 8). Courts ruled for parents in 17% of cases, suggesting that in 83% of cases, the school resource officer, the school personnel, or the collaboration between the two parties were found acceptable by the courts.

Conclusion

The courts have largely ruled in favor of school personnel and school resource officers, suggesting that their performance meets the job expectations. However, other concerns may be relevant. Students were arrested in 61% of cases (n = 27), suggesting the presence of school resource officers may accelerate the school to prison pipeline. To prevent further escalating these issues, schools should have a clearly articulated memorandum of agreement, and use proactive strategies school such as school wide positive behavior interventions and support to prevent challenging behavior in schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abshire v. Boudreaux, 18-0205W.D. LA. (2018).

  • A.M. v. Holmes, 830 F. 3d 1123 Court of Appeals, 830 F.3d 1123 (2016).

  • Anderson, M.D. (2015). When schooling meets policing. Washington, DC: The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/09/when-schooling-meets-policing/406348/.

  • B.A. v. State of Indiana, 100 N.E.3d 225 (2018).

  • Chicago Public Schools (2019). Data on school arrests 2013–2014. Chicago, IL: Chicago Public Schools. https://infogram.com/_/IYB5YYXkEc9bkLhnPq5X.

  • Christle, C. A., Ryan, J. B., & Dunn, M. (2010). The school to prison pipeline. In M. Yell & D. Bateman (Eds.), Current trends and legal issues in special education (pp. 207–222). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.

  • Counts, J., Randall, K. N., Ryan, J. B., & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). School resource officers in public schools: a national review. Education and Treatment of Children, 41, 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DH ex rel. Dawson v. Clayton County School Dist., 904 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (N.D. Ga. 2012).

  • Education World (2019). School resource officers seeing results. https://www.educationworld.com/a_issues/issues/issues214.shtml.

  • French-Marcelin, M. (2019). Bullies in blue. ACLU. https://www.aclu.org/issues/juvenile-justice/school-prisonpipeline/bulliesblue.

  • Gottlieb v. Laurel Highlands School District, F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2001).

  • Hawker v. Sandy City Corporation (10th Cir 2014).

  • Holland, P. (2006). Schooling Miranda: policing interrogation in the twenty-first century schoolhouse. Loyola Legal Review, 39, 41–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • In the Matter of D.A.R., a juvenile (2002). Appellant No. 08-01-00075-CV. El Paso: Court of Appeals of Texas.

  • In re Randy G., 28P.3d 239, 110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 516, 26 Cal. 4th 556 (2001).

  • In re K. S., 183 Cal. App. 4th 72, 108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 32 (Ct. App. 2010).

  • In re R. H. (2002). 791A.2d 331, 568Pa. 1.

  • Jaeger, K. (2015). The reason this 7-year-old was handcuffed will infuriate you. https://archive.attn.com/stories/3985/child-handcuffed-at-michigan-elementary-school.

  • JDB v. North Carolina, 131S. Ct. 2394, 564 U.S. 261, 180L. Ed. 2d 310 (2011).

  • JV v.Sanchez, 12-0046 MV/CG (D.N.M 2013).

  • Katsiyannis, A., Counts, J., Adams, S., & Ennis, P. R. (2019). Excessive force and students with disabilities: legal and practice considerations. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 885–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. Y. (2012). Policing school discipline. Brooklyn Law Review, 77, 861–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, K. L., Gresham, F., & Shaughnessy, Y. (2002). Serving students with or at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: future challenges. Education & Treatment of Children, 25, 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, C. A. (2016). The school-to-prison pipeline: a critical review of the punitive paradigm shift. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0397-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley v. Lott, 1:03-cv-269 Edgar (E.D. Tn. 2005).

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86S. Ct. 1602, 16L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966).

  • Mooney, P., Ryan, J. B., Denny, R. K., & Gunter, P. L. (2012). Behavior modification/traditional techniques for students with EBD. In J. P. Bakken, F. E. Obiakor & A. F. Rotatori (Eds), Advances in special education: behavioral disorders: current perspectives and issues: identification, assessment, and instruction of students with EBD (pp. 173–202). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Musu-Gillette, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., Kemp, J., Diliberti, M., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2018). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2017 (NCES 2018-036/NCJ 251413). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30, 619–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of School Resource Officers (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. https://nasro.org/frequently-asked-questions/.

  • National Association of School Resource Officers (2012). To protect and educate: the school resource officer and the prevention of violence in schools. https://nasro.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NASRO-To-Protect-and-Educatenosecurity.pdf.

  • National Center for Juvenile Justice (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 national report. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/nr2014/.

  • NC v. Commonwealth of KY, 2011-SG-000271-DG (2013).

  • New Jersey v. TLO, 468 U.S. 1214, 104S. Ct. 3583, 82L. Ed. 2d 881 (Supreme Court 1984).

  • Nicol v. Auburn-Washburn USD 437, 231F. Supp. 2d 1107 (D. Kansas 2002).

  • People v. Dilworth, 661 NE 2d 310, 169 Ill.2d 105, 214 Ill. Dec. 456 (1996).

  • Ryan, J. B., Katsiyannis, A., Counts, J., & Shelnut, J. C. (2018). The growing concerns regarding school resource officers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53, 188–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State v. Meneese, 282P. 3d 83, 174 Wash.2d 937 (2012).

  • Strategies for Youth (2013). If not now, when? A survey of juvenile just training in Americas police academies. http://strategiesforyouth.org/sfysite/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/SFYReport_02-2013_rev.pdf.

  • The Associated Press (2016). Deputy who tossed a S.C. high school student won’t be charged. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/03/afternoonupdate/deputy-who-tossed-a-sc-high-school-student-wont-be-charged.html.

  • U.S Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (2018). 2015-16 Civil rights data collection: school climate and safety. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (2014). Civil rights data collection data snapshot: school discipline (Issue brief no. 1). Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (2013). COPS fact sheet: memorandum of understanding for school-based partnerships. https://cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/2017AwardDocs/chp/MOU_Fact_Sheet.pdf.

  • White House (2013). School resource officers. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2013/03/28/school-resource-officers.

  • Williams, v. Morgan, No. 14-4066 (6th Cir. 2016).

  • Wolf, K. C. (2018). Assessing students’ civil rights claims against school resource officers. Pace Law Review, 38, 215–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula E. Chan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

This research was a case law review, thus, informed consent was not required because the data (i.e., court cases) were published primary sources.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, P.E., Counts, J., Katsiyannis, A. et al. Litigation and School Resource Officers. J Child Fam Stud 28, 3296–3306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01504-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01504-7

Keywords

Navigation