Abstract
The Developmental Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII) remains the mainstay in India for diagnostic confirmation and validation of upcoming screening tools for development in infants and toddlers. This is an Indian adaptation of Bayley Scales of Infant Development which is the globally accepted gold standard. However, the DASII cutoff points used for categorizing development and distinguishing normal from abnormal development are not in agreement across different studies conducted over the last two decades in India. This is probably due to a lack of mention of cutoff points in the DASII manual and existing literature. The current systematic review summarizes the heterogeneity in literature for interpretation of DASII and its cutoff points. Also, a perspective on the ideal cutoff points is presented.
References
Mukherjee SB, Aneja S, Krishnamurthy V, Srinivasan R. Incorporating developmental screening and surveillance of young children in office practice. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:627–35.
Phatak P, Misra N. Developmental assessment scales for Indian infants (DASII) 1-30 months - revision of Baroda norms with indigenous material. Psychol Stud. 1996;41:55–6.
Saini L, Madaan P, Naik MRR. General movements: longitudinal assessment better than cross-sectional. Brain Dev. 2019;41:563–4.
Jain R, Arora A, Anand R, Malhotra S, Mittal M, Juneja M. Designing and validation of a hindi-language parent self-report developmental screening tool. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54(7):550–5.
Bhave A, Bhargava R, Kumar R. Development and validation of a new Lucknow development screen for indian children aged 6 months to 2 years. J Child Neurol. 2010;25(1):57–60.
Juneja M, Mohanty M, Jain R, Ramji S. Ages and stages questionnaire as a screening tool for developmental delay in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49(6):457–61.
Phatak P, Dhapre M, Pandit AN, Kulkarni S. A study of Baroda development screening test for infants. Indian Pediatr. 1991;28:843–50.
Phatak P. Motor and mental developmental profiles of normal babies of 1-30months of age, and their use as reference profiles in therapeutic work. Indian J Clin Psychol. 1995;22:36–42.
Chaudhary S, Kulkarni S, Pajnigar F, Pandit AN, Deshmukh S. A longitudinal followup of development of preterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 1991;28:873–80.
Yue A, Jiang Q, Wang B, et al. Concurrent validity of the ages and stages questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China. PLoS ONE. 14(9):e0221675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221675.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PM contributed by literature search, qualitative synthesis, and writing of the initial draft. LS and VS contributed by planning the study, literature search, qualitative synthesis, and critical review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of manuscript to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. VS will act as guarantor for this paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 24 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madaan, P., Saini, L. & Sondhi, V. Development Assessment Scale for Indian Infants: A Systematic Review and Perspective on Dwindling Cutoffs. Indian J Pediatr 88, 918–920 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03671-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03671-2