Skip to main content
Log in

Designing and validation of a Hindi-language parent self-report developmental screening tool

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To design and validate Hindi-language parent self-report developmental screening questionnaires for 9-month and 18-month-old Indian children.

Design

Cross-sectional study

Setting

Tertiary-care pediatric hospital from April 2014 to March 2016

Participants

In each age group (9-month and 18-month), 45 children were enrolled for designing of questionnaires (30 for obtaining parental observations of current development and 15 for pre-testing). For validation of tool, 100 children (60 low risk and 40 high risk) were enrolled in each age group.

Methods

For designing, observations regarding current developmental milestones were obtained from parents and a list of all enumerated milestones was prepared. After detailed discussion by a team of developmental pediatricians, pediatric resident, clinical psychologist and language specialist, milestones were chosen for drafting of questionnaires. In each age group, drafts were pre-tested and required modifications were done. The final questionnaires contained 20 items each to be scored on a Likert scale (total score ranging from 20 to 60, a lower score indicating a higher risk of developmental delay). These questionnaires were validated against Developmental Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII), a gold standard instrument.

Results

On ROC analysis, the 9-month and 18-month screening tool had area under curve of 0.988 and 0.953, respectively, for detecting developmental delay. Score ≤50 on the 9-months questionnaire had sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87.2%. Score ≤49 on the 18-months questionnaire had sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 88.7%.

Conclusions

The new questionnaires have a promising role in developmental screening of children at the time of routine immunizations in our country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, et al. Practice Parameter: Evaluation of the Child with Global Developmental Delay: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2003;60:367–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M. A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:421–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spittle A, Orton J, Anderson P, Boyd R, Doyle LW. Early developmental intervention programmes post-hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD005495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shonkoff JP, Hauser-Cram P. Early intervention for disabled infants and their families: a quantitative analysis. Pediatrics. 1987;80:650–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharkey MA, Palitz ME, Reece LF, Rutherford BL, Akers JP, Alvin BL, et al. The effect of early referral and intervention on the developmentally disabled infant: evaluation at 18 months of age. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1990;3:163–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey DB, Hebbeler K, Scarborough A, Spiker D, Mallik S. First experiences with early intervention: a national perspective. Pediatrics. 2004;113:887–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Earls MF, Hay SS. Setting the stage for success: implementation of developmental and behavioral screening and surveillance in primary care practice—the North Carolina Assuring Better Child Health and Development (ABCD) Project. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sices L, Feudtner C, McLaughlin J, Drotar D, Williams M. How do primary care physicians identify young children with developmental delays? A national survey. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24:409–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rydz D, Srour M, Oskoui M, Marget N, Shiller M, Birnbaum R, et al. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified Kuppuswamy’s Socioeconomic Scale: Social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:185–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Phatak P. Manual for using Development Assessment Scales for Indian Infants (DASII): Based on revised Baroda norms. Pune: Anand Agencies; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mukherjee SB, Aneja S, Krishnamurthy V, Srinivasan R. Incorporating developmental screening and surveillance of young children in office practice. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:627–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Silberberg D, Arora N, Bhutani V, Durkin M, Gulati S. Neuro-developmental disorders in India–An INCLEN study. Neurology. 2013;80:IN6-2.001.

  14. Bhave A, Bhargava R, Kumar R. Development and validation of a new Lucknow Development Screen for Indian children aged 6 months to 2 years. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L. Revision of a parentcompleted development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:313–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsay NM, Healy GN, Colditz PB, Lingwood BE. Use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to predict outcome after hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in the neonate. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44:590–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Skellern CY, Rogers Y, O’Callaghan MJ. A parentcompleted developmental questionnaire: follow up of expremature infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37:125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Juneja M, Mohanty M, Jain R, Ramji S. Ages and Stages Questionnaire as a screening tool for developmental delay in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:457–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gollenberg AL, Lynch CD, Jackson LW, McGuinness BM, Msall ME. Concurrent validity of the parent-completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, 2nd Ed. with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II in a low-risk sample. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:485–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Glascoe FP. Parent’s Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS). Nashville, TN: Ellsworth & Vandermeer Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gustawan WI, Machfudz S. Validity of parents’ evaluation of developmental status (PEDS) in detecting developmental disorders in 3–12 month old infants. Paediatr Indones. 2010;50:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malhi P, Singhi P. Role of parents evaluation of developmental status in detecting developmental delay in young children. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:271–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram, National Health Mission. Ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India. Available from: http://nrhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/RBSK/Fo_more_ information.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, R., Arora, A., Anand, R. et al. Designing and validation of a Hindi-language parent self-report developmental screening tool. Indian Pediatr 54, 550–555 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1066-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1066-6

Keywords

Navigation