Abstract
Ki67 is a well-known proliferation marker for the evaluation of cell proliferation. Numerous studies have indicated that Ki67 index independently predicts cancer progression. Moreover, because Ki67 is highly expressed in malignant cells but almost could not be detected in normal cells, it has become a promising target for cancer therapy. In this review, we summarize recent advances in Ki67 targeted cancer therapy. In particular, we highlight recent development on the exploitation of Ki67 promoter to drive the expression of siRNAs or therapeutic genes in cancer cells specifically. The use of Ki67 as an attractive target opens a new avenue for cancer therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The nuclear Ki67 protein is generally expressed only in proliferating cells [1]. Ki67 is mainly located in the nucleolar cortex during interphase, and is recruited to condensed chromosomes during mitosis [2, 3]. Ki67 gene is located on chromosome 10q25-ter and encodes two Ki67 isoforms of 345 and 395 kDa, respectively [4,5,6].
Ki67 expression level increases from G1 phase to mitosis, and then rapidly decreases immediately after mitosis. Ki67 protein is detected in the nuclei of cells at G1, S, G2 phase and mitosis, but not in the nuclei of quiescent cells at G0 phase [7, 8]. Therefore, Ki67 expression level indicates the status of cell proliferation. Indeed, Ki67 is highly overexpressed in cancer cells and has been proposed as a prognostic marker of cancer [9, 10].
In this review, we first summarize recent progress regarding the prognostic value of Ki67, and then focus on rational design of Ki67 as a therapeutic target for cancer therapy in preclinical and clinical studies.
Ki67 as a prognostic factor of cancer
Ki67 has been widely investigated as a potential prognostic marker of proliferation in retrospective studies of malignant diseases [11, 12]. Accumulating clinical studies have shown the promise of Ki67 as a tool for cancer diagnosis [13,14,15,16]. Immunostaining for Ki67 expression is the gold standard, and a cutoff level of 10–14% positive staining is used to judge high risk of prognosis [17,18,19]. Ki67 index has become an independent prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients [20].
To investigate clinical value of p53 and Ki67 expression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 1239 patients with RCC was performed and the results indicated that the combined detection of p53 and Ki67 was superior to any single marker to improve the accuracy of the prognosis of RCC patients [21].
Ki67 as a therapeutic target for cancer therapy
Given the important role of Ki67 in cell proliferation, the inhibition of Ki67 might be considered when designing novel strategies for cancer therapy. Ki67 is proposed as an attractive therapeutic target for cancer because it is highly expressed in most malignant cells but is rarely detected in normal cells [22]. Below we will discuss different approaches for Ki67 targeted cancer therapy (Fig. 1).
Ki67-Antisense nucleotide
Systemically delivered unformulated antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have proven to be effective as human therapeutics in several non-oncology diseases [23,24,25,26,27]. Several ASOs have been used in clinical studies to cure carcinoma [28,29,30]. Schlüter et al. found that Ki67 specific antisense oligonucleotides (ASODNs) inhibited the proliferation of human myeloma cells [4]. Kausch et al. reported that Ki67 ASOs inhibited cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo [31]. Furthermore, Ki67 ASODNs have been used in phase I clinical study in patients with bladder cancer [32]. Recently, we demonstrated that methylated oligonucleotide targeting Ki67 could effectively inhibit the proliferation while induce the apoptosis of renal carcinoma cells [33].
Anti-Ki67 peptide nucleic acid
Unfortunately, clinical application of ASOs is limited due to several disadvantages such as low affinity, susceptibility to nuclease degradation and non-specific binding. Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are synthetic DNA analogs in which phosphodiester backbone is substituted with unchanged 2-N-aminoethylglycine units. Importantly, PNA backbone provides good and specific hybridization property with complementary targets [34]. Recently, PNAs have been developed as antisense (targeting mRNA or microRNAs) and antigene agents (targeting genomic DNA) to regulate gene expression [35,36,37]. For example, PNAs were more efficient than analogous ASOs to inhibit human telomerase activity [38]. Moreover, we treated human renal carcinoma 786-0 cells with the lipid-delivered PNAs against Ki67 and Ki67 ASOs, and found that anti-Ki67 PNA had stronger effects to inhibit the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of renal carcinoma cells than ASO. Thus PNA against Ki67 is a promising agent for the treatment of renal cancer [39].
RNA interference (RNAi) targeting Ki67
RNAi emerges as a powerful tool for cancer therapy [40]. siRNAs could inhibit multiple targets simultaneously and maximize antitumor efficacy [41]. Recently, we investigated the effects of siRNA against Ki67 on Ki67 expression and the proliferation of human RCCs, and found that siRNA-mediated knockdown of Ki67 resulted in efficient and specific inhibition of in vitro cell proliferation compared to antisense technologies [42].
To circumvent the drawback that siRNA-mediated effects are transient, we established pSilencerKi67 construct that contained short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) against Ki67. We demonstrated that pSilencerKi67 demonstrated better inhibition of the proliferation and induction of the apoptosis of 786-O human renal carcinoma cells than synthetic siRNAs [43].
Oncolytic adenoviral mediated Ki67-siRNA
The off-target effects and immune response via the activation of toll-like receptor (TLR) have hampered preclinical and clinical application of siRNAs [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. To overcome these obstacles, numerous methods including modification of RNAs, optimization of delivery systems, and proper in vivo administration have been exploited intensively [54,55,56]. One of the promising delivery systems is oncolytic adenovirus.
Oncolytic viruses can replicate selectively in tumor cells, leading to intratumoral virus spread. Several clinical trials have tested a variety of conditionally replicative viruses such as conditionally replicative adenovirus (CRAds), vaccinia virus, herpes simplex virus and Newcastle disease virus. To selectively target CRAds to tumor cells, we could employ two strategies: one is to delete viral element necessary for viral replication in normal cells but not in tumor cells such as ONYX-015 [57, 58]; the other is to use a tumor-specific promoter to drive the gene necessary for viral replication [59].
In preclinical models and clinical trials CRAds have shown varying degree of success [60]. In particular, CRAds based on Ad5 have demonstrated good efficacy and safety for cancer gene therapy [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. We constructed ZD55-Ki67 to keep lytic ability of oncolytic adenovirus and deliver shRNA against Ki67. Silencing of Ki67 induced apoptosis in renal cancer cells in vitro and inhibited renal cancer growth in nude mice [70]. Our data indicate that the armed oncolytic adenovirus ZD55–Ki67 could be used for renal cancer gene therapy.
To further increase the safety of CRAds, it is necessary to modify them to restrict adenovirus replication only in tumor cells [71, 72]. We developed an oncolytic virus G250–Ki67, in which E1A gene (essential early viral genes for replication) was controlled by renal cancer specific G250 promoter. Our data indicate that this vector efficiently replicated in renal cancer cells only, and mediated knockdown of Ki67 to inhibit the proliferation while induce the apoptosis of renal cancer cells. Therefore, G250-specific CRAds carrying Ki67-siRNA show promise for renal clear cell cancer therapy [73].
Oncolytic adenovirus targeting both Ki67 and telomerase
Cancer is a complex disease resulting from the accumulation of multiple mutations. Thus, multiple siRNAs are frequently used to silence multiple oncogenes [74]. Telomerase is composed of an ubiquitously expressed RNA component (hTR) and a catalytic subunit human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) [75]. Telomerase becomes an attractive target for cancer therapy because telomerase activity is very high in cancer cells but is either reduced or absent in normal cells. We recently constructed an oncolytic adenovirus that contains Ki67 promoter to control E1A expression, and double siRNAs to target Ki67 and hTERT. This vector effectively inhibited the growth of renal cancer cells both in vitro and in animal models, and provides a promising strategy by silencing different oncogenes for renal cancer therapy [76].
Ki67 promoter controlled cancer gene therapy
To understand the mechanism that regulates Ki67 expression, we characterized Ki67 core promoter which is TATA less and GC rich region containing putative Sp1 binding sites. Overexpression of Sp1 enhanced Ki67 promoter activity, while downregulation of Sp1 expression effectively inhibited Ki67 transcription. Thus, Sp1 is essential to Ki67 promoter activity [77, 78]. Furthermore, we showed that interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) repressed Ki67 transcription in human renal carcinoma cells in a dose dependent manner, thus Ki67 is a target of IRF1 [9, 79]. In addition, we found that p53 inhibited Ki67 promoter activity dose dependently and identified Sp1-binding sites responsible for p53 mediated repression of Ki67 transcriptional [80].
Notably, Ki67 promoter keeps the specificity after integration into adenovirus genome [81]. A novel double regulated oncolytic adenovirus Ki67-ZD55-IL-24 was constructed in which both E1A and interleukin (IL)–24 expression is driven by Ki67 promoter, and it showed specific anti-tumor effects against melanoma [82]. Ki67-ZD55-IL-24 also caused significant inhibition of melanoma cell migration and invasion, and induced apoptosis effectively in melanoma xenografts in nude mice [83].
Combining CRAd therapy with chemotherapy
Several clinical studies have reported good safety and moderate anti-tumor efficacy of Onyx-015 whether administered systemically or locally [84,85,86]. However, combination of CRAds with chemotherapy achieved much better anti-tumor efficacy than either treatment alone, perhaps due to synergistic or complementary effects [87,88,89,90]. We demonstrated that Ki67-ZD55-IL-24 significantly enhanced anti-tumor efficacy of alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) against melanoma [82]. In addition, Ki67-ZD55-IL-24 conjugated with TMZ exhibited high efficacy to kill melanoma cells [91].
Combining CRAd therapy with radiotherapy
The regimens combining oncolytic adenoviruses with radiotherapy have shown greater anti-tumor efficacy than either therapy alone [92,93,94]. For example, Ki67-ZD55-IL-24 significantly enhanced anti-tumor efficacy of radiotherapy by the induction of apoptosis in renal cells, and radiotherapy did not interfere with the replication of CRAds. Therefore, the novel strategy of combing CRAds with radiotherapy has the potential for effective treatment of renal cell cancer [70].
Conclusions
Increased proliferation is a hallmark of malignant tumors, and thus nuclear protein Ki67 has been regarded as a valuable cancer biomarker. Clinically, Ki67 expression is correlated to clinical stage and metastasis of tumors. In addition, Ki67 expression is particularly high in poorly differentiated cancer tissues. Ki67 is an attractive biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of solid tumors. More importantly, various studies have indicated that the strategy of inhibiting Ki67 holds promise for renal cancer therapy. In particular, the utilization of Ki67 promoter in the design of CRAds vectors enriches our power to specially and effectively destroy cancer cells (Fig. 2). It is expected that Ki67 target cancer therapy will be applied in the clinical in the near future.
References
Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182(3):311–22.
Isola J, Helin H, Kallioniemi OP. Immunoelectron-microscopic localization of a proliferation-associated antigen Ki-67 in MCF-7 cells. Histochem J. 1990;22(9):498–506.
Verheijen R, Kuijpers HJ, Schlingemann RO, Boehmer AL, van Driel R, Brakenhoff GJ, et al. Ki-67 detects a nuclear matrix-associated proliferation-related antigen. I. Intracellular localization during interphase. J Cell Sci. 1989;92(Pt 1):123–30.
Schluter C, Duchrow M, Wohlenberg C, Becker MH, Key G, Flad HD, et al. The cell proliferation-associated antigen of antibody Ki-67: a very large, ubiquitous nuclear protein with numerous repeated elements, representing a new kind of cell cycle-maintaining proteins. J Cell Biol. 1993;123(3):513–22.
Fonatsch C, Duchrow M, Rieder H, Schlüter C, Gerdes J. Assignment of the human Ki-67 gene (MK167) to 10q25-qter. Genomics. 1991;11(2):476–7.
Duchrow M, Schluter C, Wohlenberg C, Flad HD, Gerdes J. Molecular characterization of the gene locus of the human cell proliferation-associated nuclear protein defined by monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Cell Prolif. 1996;29(1):1–12.
Du Manoir S, Guillaud P, Camus E, Seigneurin D, Brugal G. Ki-67 labeling in postmitotic cells defines different Ki-67 pathways within the 2c compartment. Cytometry. 1991;12(5):455–63.
Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol. 1984;133(4):1710–5.
Rioux-Leclercq N, Turlin B, Bansard J, Patard J, Manunta A, Moulinoux JP, et al. Value of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and p53 determinations as predictive factors of outcome in renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2000;55(4):501–5.
Visapää H, Bui M, Huang Y, Seligson D, Tsai H, Pantuck A, et al. Correlation of Ki-67 and gelsolin expression to clinical outcome in renal clear cell carcinoma. Urology. 2003;61(4):845–50.
Karamitopoulou E, Perentes E, Tolnay M, Probst A. Prognostic significance of MIB-1, p53, and bcl-2 immunoreactivity in meningiomas. Hum Pathol. 1998;29(2):140–5.
Geyer FC, Rodrigues DN, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, et al. Molecular classification of estrogen receptor-positive/luminal breast cancers. Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19(1):39–53.
Zizi-Sermpetzoglou A, Moustou E, Petrakopoulou N, Arkoumani E, Tepelenis N, Savvaidou V, et al. Atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus. A case report and a review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(1):118–21.
Zini L, Porpiglia F, Fassnacht M. Contemporary management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;60(5):1055–65.
Viale G. Pathological work up of the primary tumor: getting the proper information out of it. Breast. 2011;20(Suppl 3):S82–6.
Bertolini M, Sobue T, Thompson A, Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. Chemotherapy induces oral mucositis in mice without additional noxious stimuli. Transl Oncol. 2017;10(4):612–20.
Ibrahim T, Farolfi A, Scarpi E, Mercatali L, Medri L, Ricci M, et al. Hormonal receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, and Ki67 discordance between primary breast cancer and paired metastases: clinical impact. Oncology. 2013;84(3):150–7.
Blancato J, Singh B, Liu A, Liao DJ, Dickson RB. Correlation of amplification and overexpression of the c-myc oncogene in high-grade breast cancer: FISH, in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical analyses. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(8):1612–9.
Chlebowski RT, Col N, Winer EP, Collyar DE, Cummings SR, Vogel VG 3rd, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(15):3328–43.
Nagao K, Yamamoto Y, Hara T, Komatsu H, Inoue R, Matsuda K, et al. Ki67 and BUBR1 may discriminate clinically insignificant prostate cancer in the PSA range < 4 ng/ml. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(4):555–64.
Zheng K, Zhu W, Tan J, Wu W, Yang S, Zhang J. Retrospective analysis of a large patient sample to determine p53 and Ki67 expressions in renal cell carcinoma. J BUON. 2014;19(2):512–6.
Li LT, Jiang G, Chen Q, Zheng JN. Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(3):1566–72.
Gaudet D, Alexander VJ, Baker BF, Brisson D, Tremblay K, Singleton W, et al. Antisense inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(5):438–47.
Kennedy BW. Mongersen, an oral SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide, and Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2461.
Wheeler TM, Leger AJ, Pandey SK, MacLeod AR, Nakamori M, Cheng SH, et al. Targeting nuclear RNA for in vivo correction of myotonic dystrophy. Nature. 2012;488(7409):111–5.
Buller HR, Bethune C, Bhanot S, Gailani D, Monia BP, Raskob GE, et al. Factor XI antisense oligonucleotide for prevention of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(3):232–40.
Gaudet D, Brisson D, Tremblay K, Alexander VJ, Singleton W, Hughes SG, et al. Targeting APOC3 in the familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2200–6.
Natale R, Blackhall F, Kowalski D, Ramlau R, Bepler G, Grossi F, et al. Evaluation of antitumor activity using change in tumor size of the surviving antisense oligonucleotide LY2181308 in combination with docetaxel for second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized open-label phase II study. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(11):1704–8.
Sen M, Thomas SM, Kim S, Yeh JI, Ferris RL, Johnson JT, et al. First-in-human trial of a STAT3 decoy oligonucleotide in head and neck tumors: implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(8):694–705.
Laskin JJ, Nicholas G, Lee C, Gitlitz B, Vincent M, Cormier Y, et al. Phase I/II trial of custirsen (OGX-011), an inhibitor of clusterin, in combination with a gemcitabine and platinum regimen in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(3):579–86.
Kausch I, Lingnau A, Endl E, Sellmann K, Deinert I, Ratliff TL, et al. Antisense treatment against Ki-67 mRNA inhibits proliferation and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(5):710–6.
Kausch I, Jiang H, Ewerdwalbesloh N, Doehn C, Krüger S, Sczakiel G, et al. Inhibition of Ki-67 in a renal cell carcinoma severe combined immunodeficiency disease mouse model is associated with induction of apoptosis and tumour growth inhibition. BJU Int. 2005;95(3):416–20.
Li XQ, Pei DS, Qian GW, Yin XX, Cheng Q, Li LT, et al. The effect of methylated oligonucleotide targeting Ki-67 gene in human 786-0 renal carcinoma cells. Tumour Biol. 2011;32(5):863–72.
Ratilainen T, Holmén A, Tuite E, Nielsen PE, Nordén B. Thermodynamics of sequence-specific binding of PNA to DNA. Biochemistry. 2000;39(26):7781–91.
Thomas SM, Sahu B, Rapireddy S, Bahal R, Wheeler SE, Procopio EM, et al. Antitumor effects of EGFR antisense guanidine-based peptide nucleic acids in cancer models. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8(2):345–52.
Cheng CJ, Bahal R, Babar IA, Pincus Z, Barrera F, Liu C, et al. MicroRNA silencing for cancer therapy targeted to the tumour microenvironment. Nature. 2015;518(7537):107–10.
Hanvey JC, Peffer NJ, Bisi JE, Thomson SA, Cadilla R, Josey JA, et al. Antisense and antigene properties of peptide nucleic acids. Science. 1992;258(5087):1481–5.
Norton JC, Piatyszek MA, Wright WE, Shay JW, Corey DR. Inhibition of human telomerase activity by peptide nucleic acids. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14(5):615–9.
Zheng JN, Sun YF, Pei DS, Liu JJ, Sun XQ, Chen JC, et al. Anti-Ki-67 peptide nucleic acid affects the proliferation and apoptosis of human renal carcinoma cells in vitro. Life Sci. 2005;76(16):1873–81.
Wyatt CA, Geoghegan JC, Brinckerhoff CE. Short hairpin RNA-mediated inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in MDA-231 cells: effects on matrix destruction and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2005;65(23):11101–8.
Zuckerman JE, Davis ME. Clinical experiences with systemically administered siRNA-based therapeutics in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(12):843–56.
Zheng JN, Ma TX, Cao JY, Sun XQ, Chen JC, Li W, et al. Knockdown of Ki-67 by small interfering RNA leads to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in human renal carcinoma cells. Life Sci. 2006;78(7):724–9.
Zheng JN, Sun YF, Pei DS, Liu JJ, Ma TX, Han RF, et al. Treatment with vector-expressed small hairpin RNAs against Ki67 RNA-induced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in human renal carcinoma cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2006;38(4):254–61.
Burnett JC, Rossi JJ. RNA-based therapeutics: current progress and future prospects. Chem Biol. 2012;19(1):60–71.
Vaishnaw AK, Gollob J, Gamba-Vitalo C, Hutabarat R, Sah D, Meyers R, et al. A status report on RNAi therapeutics. Silence. 2010;1(1):14.
Sepp-Lorenzino L, Ruddy M. Challenges and opportunities for local and systemic delivery of siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(5):628–32.
Whitehead KA, Langer R, Anderson DG. Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(2):129–38.
Chen SH, Zhaori G. Potential clinical applications of siRNA technique: benefits and limitations. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011;41(2):221–32.
Pecot CV, Calin GA, Coleman RL, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK. RNA interference in the clinic: challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(1):59–67.
Wu SY, Lopez-Berestein G, Calin GA, Sood AK. RNAi therapies: drugging the undruggable. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(240):240.
Ku SH, Kim K, Choi K, Kim SH, Kwon IC. Tumor-targeting multifunctional nanoparticles for siRNA delivery: recent advances in cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(8):1182–93.
Conde J, Artzi N. Are RNAi and miRNA therapeutics truly dead? Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):141–4.
Haussecker D. The business of RNAi therapeutics in 2012. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2012;1:e8.
Vicentini FT, Borgheti-Cardoso LN, Depieri LV, de Macedo Mano D, Abelha TF, Petrilli R. Delivery systems and local administration routes for therapeutic siRNA. Pharm Res. 2013;30(4):915–31.
Conde J, Edelman ER, Artzi N. Target-responsive DNA/RNA nanomaterials for microRNA sensing and inhibition: the jack-of-all-trades in cancer nanotheranostics? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;81:169–83.
Zhou Y, Zhang C, Liang W. Development of RNAi technology for targeted therapy–a track of siRNA based agents to RNAi therapeutics. J Control Release. 2014;193:270–81.
Bischoff JR, Kirn DH, Williams A, Heise C, Horn S, Muna M, et al. An adenovirus mutant that replicates selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science. 1996;274(5286):373–6.
Liu XY. Targeting gene-virotherapy of cancer and its prosperity. Cell Res. 2006;16(11):879–86.
Yu DC, Chen Y, Dilley J, Li Y, Embry M, Zhang H, et al. Antitumor synergy of CV787, a prostate cancer-specific adenovirus, and paclitaxel and docetaxel. Cancer Res. 2001;61(2):517–25.
Choi JW, Lee JS, Kim SW, Yun CO. Evolution of oncolytic adenovirus for cancer treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(8):720–9.
Rajecki M, Kanerva A, Stenman UH, Tenhunen M, Kangasniemi L, Särkioja M, et al. Treatment of prostate cancer with Ad5/3Delta24hCG allows non-invasive detection of the magnitude and persistence of virus replication in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(2):742–51.
Lei J, Li QH, Yang JL, Liu F, Wang L, Xu WM, et al. The antitumor effects of oncolytic adenovirus H101 against lung cancer. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(2):555–62.
Freytag SO, Movsas B, Aref I, Stricker H, Peabody J, Pegg J, et al. Phase I trial of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated suicide gene therapy combined with IMRT for prostate cancer. Mol Ther. 2007;15(5):1016–23.
Li JL, Liu HL, Zhang XR, Xu JP, Hu WK, Liang M, et al. A phase I trial of intratumoral administration of recombinant oncolytic adenovirus overexpressing HSP70 in advanced solid tumor patients. Gene Ther. 2009;16(3):376–82.
Nemunaitis J, Tong AW, Nemunaitis M, Senzer N, Phadke AP, Bedell C, et al. A phase I study of telomerase-specific replication competent oncolytic adenovirus (telomelysin) for various solid tumors. Mol Ther. 2010;18(2):429–34.
Yang SW, Cody JJ, Rivera AA, Waehler R, Wang M, Kimball KJ, et al. Conditionally replicating adenovirus expressing TIMP2 for ovarian cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(3):538–49.
Freytag SO, Stricker H, Lu M, Elshaikh M, Aref I, Pradhan D, et al. Prospective randomized phase 2 trial of intensity modulated radiation therapy with or without oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic gene therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89(2):268–76.
Kanerva A, Nokisalmi P, Diaconu I, Koski A, Cerullo V, Liikanen I, et al. Antiviral and antitumor T-cell immunity in patients treated with GM-CSF-coding oncolytic adenovirus. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(10):2734–44.
Tong AW, Zhang YA, Nemunaitis J. Small interfering RNA for experimental cancer therapy. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2005;7(2):114–24.
Chen RF, Li YY, Li LT, Cheng Q, Jiang G, Zheng JN. Novel oncolytic adenovirus sensitizes renal cell carcinoma cells to radiotherapy via mitochondrial apoptotic cell death. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(3):2141–6.
Toth K, Wold WS. Increasing the efficacy of oncolytic adenovirus vectors. Viruses. 2010;2(9):1844–66.
O’Shea CC. Viruses—seeking and destroying the tumor program. Oncogene. 2005;24(52):7640–55.
Liu J, Fang L, Cheng Q, Li L, Su C, Zhang B, et al. Effects of G250 promoter controlled conditionally replicative adenovirus expressing Ki67-siRNA on renal cancer cell. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(10):1880–8.
Zhang J, Ding M, Xu K, Mao L, Zheng J. shRNA-armed conditionally replicative adenoviruses: a promising approach for cancer therapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7:29824.
Shay JW, Wright WE. Telomerase therapeutics for cancer: challenges and new directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(7):577–84.
Fang L, Cheng Q, Li W, Liu J, Li L, Xu K, et al. Antitumor activities of an oncolytic adenovirus equipped with a double siRNA targeting Ki67 and hTERT in renal cancer cells. Virus Res. 2014;181:61–71.
Tian H, Qian GW, Li W, Chen FF, Di JH, Zhang BF, et al. A critical role of Sp1 transcription factor in regulating the human Ki-67 gene expression. Tumour Biol. 2011;32(2):273–83.
Pei DS, Qian GW, Tian H, Mou J, Li W, Zheng JN. Analysis of human Ki-67 gene promoter and identification of the Sp1 binding sites for Ki-67 transcription. Tumour Biol. 2012;33(1):257–66.
Chen F, Song J, Di J, Zhang Q, Tian H, Zheng J. IRF1 suppresses Ki-67 promoter activity through interfering with Sp1 activation. Tumour Biol. 2012;33(6):2217–25.
Wang MJ, Pei DS, Qian GW, Yin XX, Cheng Q, Li LT, et al. p53 regulates Ki-67 promoter activity through p53- and Sp1-dependent manner in HeLa cells. Tumour Biol. 2011;32(5):905–12.
Hoffmann D, Jogler C, Wildner O. Effects of the Ad5 upstream E1 region and gene products on heterologous promoters. J Gene Med. 2005;7(10):1356–66.
Jiang G, Jiang AJ, Cheng Q, Tian H, Li LT, Zheng JN. A dual-regulated oncolytic adenovirus expressing interleukin-24 sensitizes melanoma cells to temozolomide via the induction of apoptosis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(2):1263–71.
Jiang G, Yang CS, Xu D, Sun C, Zheng JN, Lei TC, et al. Potent anti-tumour activity of a novel conditionally replicating adenovirus for melanoma via inhibition of migration and invasion. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(10):2496–505.
Nemunaitis J, Cunningham C, Tong A, Post L, Netto G, Paulson AS, et al. Pilot trial of intravenous infusion of a replication-selective adenovirus (ONYX-015) in combination with chemotherapy or IL-2 treatment in refractory cancer patients. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003;10(5):341–52.
Reid T, Galanis E, Abbruzzese J, Sze D, Wein LM, Andrews J, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of a replication-selective oncolytic adenovirus (dl1520): phase II viral, immunologic, and clinical endpoints. Cancer Res. 2002;62(21):6070–9.
Nemunaitis J, Cunningham C, Buchanan A, Blackburn A, Edelman G, Maples P, et al. Intravenous infusion of a replication-selective adenovirus (ONYX-015) in cancer patients: safety, feasibility and biological activity. Gene Ther. 2001;8(10):746–59.
Heise C, Sampson-Johannes A, Williams A, McCormick F, Von Hoff DD, Kirn DH. ONYX-015, an E1B gene-attenuated adenovirus, causes tumor-specific cytolysis and antitumoral efficacy that can be augmented by standard chemotherapeutic agents. Nat Med. 1997;3(6):639–45.
Chu L, Gu J, Sun L, Qian Q, Qian C, Liu X. Oncolytic adenovirus-mediated shRNA against Apollon inhibits tumor cell growth and enhances antitumor effect of 5-fluorouracil. Gene Ther. 2008;15(7):484–94.
Bramante S, Koski A, Liikanen I, Vassilev L, Oksanen M, Siurala M, et al. Oncolytic virotherapy for treatment of breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(2):e1078057.
Liikanen I, Ahtiainen L, Hirvinen ML, Bramante S, Cerullo V, Nokisalmi P, et al. Oncolytic adenovirus with temozolomide induces autophagy and antitumor immune responses in cancer patients. Mol Ther. 2013;21(6):1212–23.
Jiang G, Sun C, Li RH, Wei ZP, Zheng JN, Liu YQ. Enhanced antitumor efficacy of a novel oncolytic adenovirus combined with temozolomide in the treatment of melanoma in vivo. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(1):75–85.
Wang W, Sima N, Kong D, Luo A, Gao Q, Liao S, et al. Selective targeting of HPV-16 E6/E7 in cervical cancer cells with a potent oncolytic adenovirus and its enhanced effect with radiotherapy in vitro and vivo. Cancer Lett. 2010;291(1):67–75.
Wang H, Song X, Zhang H, Zhang J, Shen X, Zhou Y, et al. Potentiation of tumor radiotherapy by a radiation-inducible oncolytic and oncoapoptotic adenovirus in cervical cancer xenografts. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(2):443–53.
Biroccio A, Leonetti C, Zupi G. The future of antisense therapy: combination with anticancer treatments. Oncogene. 2003;22(42):6579–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by grants from Jiangsu Province Science Foundation (No. BK2007032), Project of Invigorating Health Care through Science, Technology and Education, and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Youth Talent.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, C., Zhang, J., Ding, M. et al. Ki67 targeted strategies for cancer therapy. Clin Transl Oncol 20, 570–575 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1774-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1774-3