Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria from Cow Dung Based Biodynamic Preparations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indigenous formulations based on cow dung fermentation are commonly used in organic farming. Three biodynamic preparations viz., Panchagavya (PG), BD500 and ‘Cow pat pit’ (CPP) showed high counts of lactobacilli (109 ml−1) and yeasts (104 ml−1). Actinomycetes were present only in CPP (104 ml−1) and absent in the other two. Seven bacterial isolates from these ferments were identified by a polyphasic approach: Bacillus safensis (PG1), Bacillus cereus (PG2, PG4 PG5), Bacillus subtilis (BD2) Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus (BD3) and Bacillus licheniformis (CPP1). This is the first report of L. xylanilyticus and B. licheniformis in biodynamic preparations. Only three carbon sources—dextrose, sucrose and trehalose out of 21 tested were utilized by all the bacteria. None could utilize arabinose, dulcitol, galactose, inositol, inulin, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose and sorbitol. All the strains produced indole acetic acid (1.8–3.7 μg ml−1 culture filtrate) and ammonia. None could fix nitrogen; but all except B. safensis and B. licheniformis could solubilize phosphorous from insoluble tri-calcium phosphate. All the strains except L. xylaniliticus exhibited antagonism to the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia bataticola whereas none could inhibit Sclerotium rolfsi. In green house experiment in soil microcosms, bacterial inoculation significantly promoted growth of maize; plant dry weight increased by ~21 % due to inoculation with B. cereus (PG2). Results provide a basis for understanding the beneficial effects of biodynamic preparations and industrial deployment of the strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Somasundaram E, Amanullah MM, Vaiyapuri K, Thirukkumaran K, Sathyamoorthi K (2007) Influence of organic sources of nutrients on the yield and economics of crops under maize based cropping system. J Appl Sci Res 3:1774–1777

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rupela OP, Gopalakrishnan S, Krajewski M, Sriveni M (2003) A novel method for the identification and enumeration of microorganisms with potential for suppressing fungal plant pathogens. Biol Fertil Soils 39:131–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stalin V, Perumal K, Stanley Abraham L, Kalaichelvan PT (2010) Screening and production of subtilin from Bacillus subtilis isolated from nutrient-rich organic and biodynamic manures. IUP J Life Sci 4:34–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter-Boggs L, Reganold JP, Kennedy AC (2000) Biodynamic preparations: short term effect on crops, soils, and weed populations. Am J Altern Agric 15:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raupp J, Koenig UJ (1996) Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels. Biol Agric Hortic 13:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swain MR, Ray RC (2009) Biocontrol and other beneficial activities of Bacillus subtilis isolated from cowdung microflora. Microbiol Res 164:121–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannattasio M, Vendramin E, Fornasier F, Alberghini S, Zanardo M, Stellin F, Concheri G, Stevanato P, Ertani A, Nardi S, Rizzi V, Piffanelli P, Spaccini R, Mazzei P, Piccolo A, Squartini A (2013) Microbiological features and bioactivity of a fermented manure product (preparation 500) used in biodynamic agriculture. J Microbiol Biotech 23:644–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Naik Nagaraj, Sreenivasa MN (2009) Influence of bacteria isolated from Panchagavya on seed germination and seed vigour in wheat. Karnataka J Agric Sci 22:23–231

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suresh Kumar R, Ganesh P, Tharmaraj K, Saranraj P (2011) Growth and development of blackgram (Vigna mungo) under foliar application of Panchagavya as organic source of nutrient. Curr Bot 2:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N (2004) Microbiology: a laboratory manual, 6th edn. Pearson education, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bric JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE (1991) Rapid in situ assay for indole acetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:535–538

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobson CB, Pasternak JJ, Glick BR (1994) Partial purification and characterization of ACC deaminase from plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR 12-2. Can J Microbiol 40:1019–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Solaiappan AR (2002) Microbiological Studies in Panchagavya. Bio-control Laboratory, Chengalput, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crielly EM, Logan NA, Anderton A (1994) Studies on the Bacillus flora of milk and milk products. J Appl Microbiol 77:256–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Girija D, Deepa K, Xavier F, Antony I, Shidhi PR (2013) Analysis of cow dung microbiota—a metagenomic approach. Indian J Biotech 12:372–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee CS, Jung YT, Park S, Oh TK, Yoon JH (2010) Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus sp. nov., a xylan degrading bacterium isolated from forest humus. Int J Syst Envol Microbiol 60:281–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Collins CH, Lyne PM (1976) Microbiological methods, 4th edn. Butterworths, Guildford, pp 434–448

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vyletelova M, Svec P, Pacova Z, Sedlacek I, Roubal P (2002) Occurence of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus licheniformis strains in the course of UHT milk production. Czech J Anim Sci 47:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  20. Satomi M, La Duc MT, Venkateswaran K (2006) Bacillus safensis spp. nov., isolated from spacecraft and assembly-facility surfaces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1735–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maheswar NU, Sathiyavani G (2012) Solubilization of phosphate by Bacillus spp. from groundnut rhizosphere (Arachis hypogaea L). J Chem Pharm Res 4:4007–4011

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sreenivasa MN, Naik Nagaraj, Bhat SN (2009) Beejamrutha: a source for beneficial bacteria. Karnataka J Agric Sci 22:1038–1040

    Google Scholar 

  23. Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R (2007) Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3- acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:619–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gutierrez-Manero FJ, Ramos B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Talon M (2001) The plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberelins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. P. Ramesh, Sr. Scientist, Network Project on Organic Farming, IISS, Bhopal for supplying the biodynamic preparations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. L. N. Rao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radha, T.K., Rao, D.L.N. Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria from Cow Dung Based Biodynamic Preparations. Indian J Microbiol 54, 413–418 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0468-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0468-6

Keywords

Navigation