Skip to main content
Log in

Sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites: Trade-offs between sex-specific costs and lifespan

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Theoretical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fitness in self-incompatible simultaneous hermaphrodites incorporates gains and costs from both male and female reproductive function, and evolutionarily stable allocation of gonadal tissue to male or female function depends on these gains and costs. Paradoxically, despite the often equal expected gains but different costs associated with each sex, contributions to expected reproductive success through male and female function must be identical. Whenever allocation costs are unequal and limiting resources are energetically expensive or risky to acquire, these costs must ultimately be paid through reduced survival, resolving the paradox by equally diminishing expected reproductive success as male and as female. Maximizing fitness as lifetime reproductive success – not just reproductive rate alone, as in previous studies – maximizes the product of expected survival time and reproductive rate. The analysis shows how male-biased allocation can thereby arise and generate novel predictions on the relation between intensity of sperm competition and allocation to male function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeloni L, Bradbury JW, Charnov EL (2002) Body size and sex allocation in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Behav Ecol 13:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N, Putz A, Michiels NK (2005) Gender trading in a hermaphrodite. Curr Biol 15:R792–R793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N, Putz A, Michiels NK (2006) Sex role preferences, gender conflict and sperm trading in simultaneous hermaphrodites: a new framework. Anim Behav 72:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeza JA (2007) Sex allocation in a simultaneously hermaphroditic marine shrimp. Evolution 61:2360–2373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1980) Sex allocation and local mate competition in barnacles. Mar Biol Lett 1:269–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1996) Sperm competition and sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Evol Ecol 10:457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Maynard Smith J, Bull JJ (1976) Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 263:125–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer EA (1981) Sexual allocation in a simultaneously hermaphroditic coral reef fish. Am Nat 117:64–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer EA (1984) Egg trading in the chalk bass, Serranus tortugarum, a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Z Tierpsychol 66:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer EA, Petersen CW (1987) The evolution of sexual patterns in the seabasses. BioScience 37:482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1969) The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q Rev Biol 44:189–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greeff JM, Michiels NK (1999a) Sperm digestion and reciprocal sperm transfer can drive hermaphrodite sex allocation to equality. Am Nat 153:421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeff JM, Michiels NK (1999b) Low potential for sexual selection in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1671–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeff JM, Parker GA (2000) Spermicide by females: what should males do? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:1759–1763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koene JM, Ter Maat A (2005) Sex role alternation in the simultaneous hermaphroditic pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis is determined by the availability of seminal fluid. Anim Behav 69:845–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL (1993) Sexual conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites: evidence from serranid fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 36:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL (2005) Bateman’s principle and simultaneous hermaphrodites: a paradox. Integr Comp Biol 45:856–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL, Lukowiak K (1984) Male-female conflict in a simultaneous hermaphrodite resolved by sperm trading. Am Nat 124:282–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL, Lukowiak K (1985) Courtship, copulation and sperm trading in the sea slug, Navanax inermis (Opisthobranchia: Cephalaspidea). Can J Zool 63:2719–2729

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL, Lukowiak K (1991) Sex and the simultaneous hermaphrodite: testing models of male-female conflict in a sea slug, Navanax inermis (Opisthobranchia). Anim Behav 41:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marconato A, Shapiro DY (1996) Sperm allocation, sperm production and fertilization rates in the bucktooth parrotfish. Anim Behav 52:971–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK (1998) Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London, pp 219–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK, Koene JM (2006) Sexual selection favors harmful mating in hermaphrodites more than in gonochorists. Integr Comp Biol 46:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK, Newman LJ (1998) Sex and violence in hermaphrodites. Nature 391:647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MT (1994) Models of sexual selection in hermaphrodites, especially plants. Am Nat 144:S100–S125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pen I, Weissing FJ (1999) Sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites: a new look at Charnov’s invariance principle. Evol Ecol Res 1:517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CW (1990) Variation in reproductive success and gonadal allocation in the simultaneous hermaphrodite, Serranus fasciatus. Oecologia 83:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CW, Fischer EA (1996) Intraspecific variation in sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite: The effect of individual size. Evolution 50:636–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CW, Warner RR (2002) The ecological context of reproductive behavior. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes. Academic, San Diego, pp 103–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Ladurner P, Rieger RM (2004) Bigger testes do work more: experimental evidence that testis size reflects testicular cell proliferation activity in the marine invertebrate, the free-living flatworm Macrostomum sp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Robertson DR (1999) Sperm and milt characteristics and male v. female gametic investment in the Caribbean reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. J Fish Biol 55:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sella G (1985) Reciprocal egg trading and brood care in a hermaphroditic polychaete worm. Anim Behav 33:938–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sella G, Ramella L (1999) Sexual conflict and mating systems in the Dorvilleid genus Ophryotrocha and the Dinophilid genus Dinophilus. Hydrobiologia 402:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner RR (1998) The role of extreme iteroparity and risk-avoidance in the evolution of mating systems. J Fish Biol 53(suppl A):82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Brent Palmer, Dave Westneat, and especially Mary Hart and Nico Michiels for helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript and for stimulating discussions about simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual conflict.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip H. Crowley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crowley, P.H. Sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites: Trade-offs between sex-specific costs and lifespan. Theor Ecol 1, 199–208 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-008-0020-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-008-0020-6

Keywords

Navigation