Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Analysis of the Urban-to-Rural Migration Determinants in the Viennese Metropolitan Area. A Transition from Suburbia to Postsuburbia?

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently urban spatial structures are affected by pervasive developments, which provoke a diversity and reorganization of population. This article examines the driving forces that cause urban-to-rural migration of population in the Austrian metropolitan area of Vienna using exploratory spatial analysis methods over the time period from 2001 to 2006. To model the qualitative changes between sub- and postsuburban processes, fuzzy sets are applied as variables. Because of significant concentration of high urban-to-rural migration along the main transportation corridors, a geographically weighted regression approach is used to determine whether suburban or postsuburban determinants are essential to predict urban-to-rural migration. The results show that the spatial variation of urban-to-rural migration can be statistically best modeled by using the two covariates “good accessibility to the core city by motorized individual transport” and a “high land price index”. The article argues that this represents the prominence of classical hard location factors, which are interpreted as typical suburban. Accordingly, the metropolitan area is—concerning urban-to-rural migration—still under the influence of suburban processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A Google Scholar search conforms this: 21,900 entries for the term “suburbanization” and only 14 entries for the terms “postsuburbanization” or “post-suburbanization” (last accessed Jan 8 2009).

  2. Garreau (1992) defined Edge Cities as centers with more than 5 million square feet of office space, 603,000 square feet of retail space and 24,000 employees. Further characteristics are that Edge Cities emerged during the last 20 or 30 years, that they are perceived by the population as one place and that they have a commuter surplus due to a high concentration of jobs.

  3. Statistics Austria http://www.statistik.at/web_en/ (last accessed Nov 10 2008)

References

  • Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use: toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge: Howard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anas, A., Arnott, R., & Small, K. (1998). Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1426–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association–LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (2005). Spatial statistical modeling in a GIS environment. In D. Maguire, M. Batty & M. Goodchild (Eds.), GIS, spatial analysis and modeling (pp. 93–111). Redlands: ESRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aring, J. (1999). Suburbia—Postsuburbia—Zwischenstadt. Die jüngere Wohnsiedlungsentwicklung im Umland der großen Städte Westdeutschlands und Folgerungen für die Regionale Planung und Steuerung. Hannover: ARL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2001). Polynucleated urban landscapes. Urban Studies, 38, 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., & Longley, P. (1994). Fractal cities: A geometry of form and function. London: Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., Yichun, X., & Zhanli, S. (1999). Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23, 205–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum-Snow, N. (2007). Did highways cause suburbanization? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 775–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontje, M., & Burdack, J. (2005). Edge cities, European-style: examples from Paris and the Randstad. Cities, 22, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsdorf, A. (2003). Wenn Städte “geformter Geist” sind, wofür steht dann Postsuburbia? Spurenlesen im ruralen Raum. TRANS. Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften, 15. http://www.inst.at/trans/15Nr/03_7/borsdorf15.htm. Last accessed Nov 13 2008.

  • Borsdorf, A. (2004). On the way to post-suburbia? Changing structures in the outskirts of European cities. In A. Borsdorf & P. Zembri (Eds.), Structures. European cities: Insights on outskirts (pp. 7–30). Paris: Blanchard Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boustedt, O. (1975). Gedanken und Beobachtungen zum Phänomen der Suburbanisierung. In ARL (Ed.), Beiträge zum Problem der Suburbanisierung (pp. 1–23). Hannover: Schroedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake, K. (2005). Der suburbane Raum als Standorttyp. In K. Brake, I. Einacke & H. Mäding (Eds.), Kräfte, Prozesse, Akteure - zur Empirie der Zwischenstadt. Zwischenstadt Band 3 (pp. 9–65). Wuppertal: Müller + Busmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake, K., Dangschat, J., Herfert, G. (2001). Suburbanisierung in Deutschland. Aktuelle Tendenzen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

  • Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., & Charlton, M. (1996). Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28, 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., & Charlton, M. (1999). Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression. Journal of Regional Science, 39, 497–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, C., McClatchey, J., & Unwin, D. (2000). Spatial variations in the average rainfall-altitude relationship in Great Britain: an approach using geographically weighted regression. International Journal of Climatology, 21, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchfield, M., Overman, H., Puga, D., & Turner, M. (2006). Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 587–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdack, J., & Herfert, G. (1998). Neue Entwicklungen an der Peripherie europäischer Großstädte. Ein Überblick. Europa Regional, 6, 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K., & Anderson, D. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P., & Frank, A. (1996). Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. GISDATA 2. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, J., & Ulfarsson, G. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 503–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. (2002). Monocentric to polycentric: New urban forms and old paradigms. In G. Bridge & S. Watson (Eds.), Companion to the City (pp. 141–154). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K., & Gaydos, L. (1998). Loose coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A., & Ord, J. (1981). Spatial processes. Models & applications. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortie, C., Dijst, M., & Ostendorf, W. (1992). The Randstad a metropolis? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 83, 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M., & Flusty, S. (2002). The resistible rise of the L.A. school. In M. Dear (Ed.), From Chicago to L.A. Making sense of urban theory (pp. 5–16). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenreich, D., & Schenk, W. (2002). Abkopplungstendenzen des suburbanen Raums von der Kernstadt—das Beispiel der Filderregion südlich von Stuttgart. Standort—Zeitschrift für angewandte Geographie, 26, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassmann, H., Görgl, P., & Helbich, M. (forthcoming). Atlas der wachsenden Stadtregion Wien.

  • Feng, J., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Suburbanization and the changes of urban internal spatial structure in Hangzhou, China. Urban Geography, 26, 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. (2006). Spatial analysis in geography. In M. Fischer (Ed.), Spatial analysis and GeoComputation. Selected essays (pp. 17–28). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. (1987). Bourgeois utopias. The rise and fall of suburbia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, S., & Wong, D. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23, 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, S., Charlton, M., & Brunsdon, C. (1996). The geography of parameter space: an investigation of spatial nonstationarity. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10, 605–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, S., Charlton, M., & Brunsdon, C. (2001). Spatial variations in school performance: a local analysis using geographically weighted regression. Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 5, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, S., Charlton, M., & Brunsdon, C. (2002). Geographically weighted regression. The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankhauser, P. (2004). Comparing the morphology of urban patterns in Europe. A fractal approach. In A. Borsdorf & P. Zembri (Eds.), Structures. European cities: Insights on outskirts (pp. 79–105). Paris: Blanchard Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J., & Rohr, H.-G. (1975). Ein Konzept der Suburbanisierung. In ARL (Ed.), Beiträge zum Problem der Suburbanisierung (pp. 25–37). Hannover: Schroedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, I. (1997). Stadtregionen 1991—Das Konzept. Statistische Nachrichten, 2, 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaebe, W. (1987). Verdichtungsräume. Stuttgart: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, J. (1992). Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. (1983). Second order analysis of point patterns: the case of Chicago as a multicenter region. The Professional Geographer, 35, 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., Kramar, H., & Loibl, W. (2001). Suburbanisierung in Österreich: ein steuerbarer Trend der Siedlungsentwicklung? In ARL (Ed.), Stadt-Umland-Probleme und Entwicklung des großflächigen Einzelhandels in den Ländern Mittel- und Südosteuropas (pp. 25–49). Hannover: Schroedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., & Kahn, M. (2004). Sprawl and urban growth. In V. Henderson & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics. Cities and geography, 4 (pp. 2481–2528). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. (1986). Spatial autocorrelation. Norwich: Geo Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. (1997). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., Richardson, H., & Wong, H. (1986). The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: The case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A, 18, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görgl, P. (2005). Structures postsuburbaines dans la region urbaine de Vienne. Revue Geographique de l'Est, 3–4, 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, A., & Steinbusch, M. (2006). Zwischen Möglichkeit und Grenze: Zur Bedeutungsgestalt der Zwischenstadt. Wuppertal: Müller + Busmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1993). Forces shaping urban Europe. Urban Studies, 30, 883–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. (1998). Urban Geography. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanika, A., Biffl, G., Fassmann, H., Kytir, J., Lebhart, G., Marik, S., et al. (2004). ÖROK-Prognosen 2001–2031. Teil 1: Bevölkerung und Arbeitskräfte nach Regionen und Bezirken Österreichs. Wien: ÖROK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbich, M. (2008). GIS-basierte multikriterielle Evaluierung des Standortfaktores landschaftliche Attraktivität. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna: Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbich, M. (under review). Postsuburban spatial evolution of the Viennese urban fringe: evidence from point process modeling. Submitted to Urban Geography.

  • Hellberg, H. (1975). Der suburbane Raum als Standort von privaten Dienstleistungseinrichtungen. In ARL (Ed.), Beiträge zum Problem der Suburbanisierung (pp. 123–147). Hannover: Schroedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, M., Couclelis, H., & Clarke, K. (2005). The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 369–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (2001). Mobilität und Verkehr in (Post-) Suburbia–ein Ausblick. RaumPlanung, 95, 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Q., & Leung, Y. (2002). Analysing regional industrialisation in Jiangsu province using geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 4, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski, D., & Wu, J. (1996). The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2001). Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 33, 717–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagermeier, A., Miosga, M., & Schussmann, K. (2001). Die Region München—Auf dem Weg zu regionalen Patchworkstrukturen. In K. Brake, J. Dangschat & G. Herfert (Eds.), Suburbanisierung in Deutschland. Aktuelle Tendenzen (pp. 163–173). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keersmaecker, M.-L., Frankhauser, P., & Thomas, I. (2003). Using fractal dimensions for characterizing intra-urban diversity: the example of Brussels. Geographical Analysis, 35, 310–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., Olin, S., & Poster, M. (1995a). The Emergence of Postsuburbia: an introduction. In R. Kling, S. Olin & M. Poster (Eds.), Postsuburban California. The transformation of Orange County since World War II (pp. 1–30). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., Olin, S., & Poster, M. (1995b). Beyond the edge: the dynamism of postsuburban regions. In R. Kling, S. Olin & M. Poster (Eds.), Postsuburban California. The transformation of Orange County since World War II (pp. vii–xx). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman, R., & Lambregts, B. (2001). Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: The case of the Randstad. Urban Studies, 38, 717–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2007). . “Edge” or “edgeless” cities? Urban spatial structure in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000. Journal of Regional Science, 47, 479–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Y. (1982). Approximate characterization of some fundamental concepts of spatial analysis. Geographical Analysis, 14, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Y. (1987). On the imprecision of boundaries. Geographical Analysis, 19, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberger, E. (2000). Austria. Society and regions. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C., & Shuttleworth, I. (2005). Analysing commuting using local regression techniques: Scale, sensitivity and geographical patterning. Environment and Planning A, 37, 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loibl, W., & Toetzer, T. (2003). Modeling growth and densification processes in suburban regions—simulation of landscape transition with spatial agents. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18, 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. (2003). Has the concentration of income and poverty among suburbs of large US metropolitan areas changed over time? Papers in Regional Science, 82, 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J., Poetz, A., & Iannuzzi, L. (2004). Spatial analysis of residential burglaries in London, Ontario. The Great Lakes Geographer, 11, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, D., & McDonald, J. (1998). Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mieszkowski, P., & Mills, E. (1993). The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning, Y., & Yan, Z. (1995). The changing industrial and spatial structure in Shanghai. Urban Geography, 16, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ÖIEB Österreichisches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung (2004). Motivation und Zufriedenheit von Zuzüglern ins Wiener Umland (Gesamtbericht, Resümee, Empfehlungen). http://www.oieb.at/download/OIEB-Zuzuegler_Zusammenfassung.pdf. Last accessed Nov 13 2008.

  • Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: GeoBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1997). Fuzzy logic, fuzzy systems and soft computing. In S. Openshaw & C. Openshaw (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in geography (pp. 268–308). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Unwin, D. (2003). Geographic information analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, F., Robinson, V., & Cobb, M. (2005). Fuzzy modeling with spatial information for geographic problems. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. (2003). A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 7, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohr-Zänker, R. (1996). Neue Zentrenstrukturen in den USA. Eine Perspektive für dezentrale Konzentration in Deutschland. Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften, 35, 196–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Frans, M., Dieleman, F., & Dijst, M. (2001). Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts, T. (1998). Zwischenstadt. Zwischen Ort und Welt, Raum und Zeit, Stadt und Land. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts, T., Koch, M., Stein, U., & Steinbusch, M. (2005). Zwischenstadt—inzwischen Stadt? Entdecken, begreifen, verändern. Wuppertal: Müller + Busmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1996). Taking Los Angeles apart: towards a postmodern geography. In R. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader (pp. 189–200). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (2000). Postmetropolis. Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (2001). Exploring the postmetropolis. In C. Minca (Ed.), Postmodern geography: Theory and praxis (pp. 37–56). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thinh, N. (2003). Contemporary spatial analysis and simulation of the settlement development of the Dresden city region. In A. Gnauck & R. R. Heinrich (Eds.), The information society and enlargement of the European Union. Part 1: concepts and methods (pp. 253–261). Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, D. (1990). Geographic information systems and cartographic modelling. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, P. (2006). Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 248–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, P. (2008). A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1, 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voith, R. (1998). Do suburbs need cities? Journal of Regional Science, 38, 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogd, J. (1983). Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, P., & Chi, G. (2006). Highways and population change. Rural Sociology, 71, 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Zhou, Y. (1999). Modelling urban population densities in Beijing 1982–90: suburbanisation and its causes. Urban Studies, 36, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., & Tiefelsdorf, M. (2005). Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7, 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2003). Die postmoderne Stadt: Neue Formen der Urbanität im Übergang vom zweiten ins dritte Jahrtausend. In H. Gebhardt, P. Reuber & G. Wolkersdorfer (Eds.), Kulturgeographie. Aktuelle Ansätze und Entwicklungen (pp. 131–147). Heidelberg: Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N., Holt, T., Steel, D., & Tranmer, M. (1996). Analysing, modelling and resolving the ecological fallacy. In P. Longley & M. Batty (Eds.), Spatial analysis: Modelling in a GIS environment (pp. 25–40). Cambridge: GeoInformation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. (2006). Spatially varying development mechanisms in the greater Beijing area: a geographically weighted regression investigation. The Annals of Regional Science, 40, 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1994). Soft computing and fuzzy logic. IEEE Software , 11, 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.-J. (1987). Fuzzy sets, decision making and expert systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Austrian Academy of Sciences grant. We would like to thank Heinz Fassmann and Josef Strobl for their valuable comments. We would also like to acknowledge the constructive comments and feedback from the reviewers. This paper was written during an academic leave of the first author in the Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, USA during fall semester 2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Postgasse 7/4/2, 1010, Vienna, Austria

    Marco Helbich

  2. Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA

    Michael Leitner

Authors
  1. Marco Helbich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Leitner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Helbich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helbich, M., Leitner, M. Spatial Analysis of the Urban-to-Rural Migration Determinants in the Viennese Metropolitan Area. A Transition from Suburbia to Postsuburbia?. Appl. Spatial Analysis 2, 237–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9026-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9026-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation