Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of sub-basaltic sediments by a multi-parametric joint inversion approach

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many parts of the world sedimentary horizons with potential for hydrocarbon are located below flood basalt provinces. However, the presence of high velocity basaltic overburden makes delineation of sediments difficult due to the low velocity layer problem. Electrical and electromagnetic methods have been used in such scenarios because of the good electrical conductivity contrast between basalts and underlying sediments. However, mapping of the target sediments becomes difficult when the layer is thin as the data errors due to inherent noise lead to equivalent solutions. To tackle such difficult situations, a joint inversion scheme incorporating seismic reflection and refraction, magnetotelluric and deep electrical resistivity datasets is presented. Efficacy of the scheme is tested for a model comprising a thin sedimentary layer sandwiched between a thick basalt cover and a granitic basement. The results indicate that the parameters of the target sedimentary layer are either poorly resolved or equivalent solutions are obtained by the inversion of individual datasets. Joint inversions of seismic reflection (RFLS) and refraction (RFRS), or DC and MT dataset pairs provide improved results and the range of equivalent solutions is narrowed down. Combination of any three of the above datasets leads to further narrowing of this range and improvements in mean model estimates. Joint inversion incorporating all the datasets is found to yield good estimates of the structure. Resolution analysis is carried out to appraise estimates of various model parameters obtained by jointly inverting different combinations of datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backus G and Gilbert F 1970 Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data; Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 266 123–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr K 1997 Electrical anisotropy and conductivity distribution functions of fractal random networks and of the crust: The scale effect of connectivity; Geophys. J. Int. 130 649–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R C 1970 Inversion of the geomagnetic induction problem; Proc. Roy. Soc. London A. 315 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S K 1982 Rift basins in the western margin of India and their hydrocarbon prospect; Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. 66 1497–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, Britto W L, Ulrych T J and deLima O A L 1988 A new approach to deriving pseudovelocity logs from resistivity logs; Geophys. Prosp. 36 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo L A and Meju M A 2007 Joint two-dimensional cross-gradient imaging of magnetotelluric and seismic travel time data for structural and lithological classification; Geophys. J. Int. 169 1261–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh D P 1971 The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical sounding measurements; Geophys. Prosp. 19 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer A A, Sinha M C and MacGregor L M 2002 Joint Effective Medium Modelling for Co-incident Seismic and Electromagnetic Data, and its Application to Studies of Porosity Structure at Mid-Ocean Ridge Crests; LITHOS Science Report 4 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hering A, Misiek R, Gyulai A, Ormos T, Dobroka M and Dresen L 1995 A joint inversion algorithm to process geoelectric and surface wave seismic data, Part I: basic ideas; Geophys. Prosp. 43 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman J R 1973 Resistivity inversion; Geophysics 38 1088–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman J R 1975 Resistivity inversion with ridge regression; Geophysics 40 798–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp D L B and Vozoff K 1975 Stable iterative method for the inversion of geophysical data; Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 42 952–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koefoed O 1969 An analysis of equivalence in resistivity sounding; Geophys. Prosp. 17 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlovskaya E and Hjelt S-E 2000 Modelling of elastic and electrical properties of solid liquid rock system with fractal microstructure; Phys. Chem. Earth, Part A: Solid Earth Geodesy 25 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manglik A and Verma S K 1998 Delineation of sediments below flood basalts by joint-inversion of seismic and magnetotelluric data; Geophys. Res. Lett. 25 4015–4018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manglik A and Verma S K 1999 Delineation of fine sedimentary structures below Deccan Trap flood basalts employing a synergistic algorithm combining seismic, MT and DC resistivity data. In: Proc. of PETROTECH, New Delhi, Paper Nr. V4S3A10 (CD-Media).

  • Marquardt D W 1970 Generalised inverse, ridge regression, biased linear estimation and non-linear estimation; Technometrics 21 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke W 1989 Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory, Revised edition (San Diego: Academic Press) 289pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani E J, Kinoshita E M, Araujo L M and da Cruz Cunha P R 1990 Parana basins petroleum potential in the depocenter area; Boletim de Geociencias da Petrobra 4 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison H F, Shoham Y, Hoversten G M and Torres-verdin C 1996 Electromagnetic mapping of electrical conductivity beneath the Columbia basalts; Geophys. Prosp. 44 963–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sain K and Kaila K L 1994 Inversion of wide-angle seismic reflection times with damped least squares; Geophysics 59 1735–1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sain K and Kaila K L 1996 Ambiguity in the solution to the velocity inversion problem and a solution by joint-inversion of seismic refraction and wide-angle reflection times; Geophys. J. Int. 124 215–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satpal O P, Sar D, Chatterjee S M and Sawai S 2006 Integrated interpretation for sub-basalt imaging in Saurashtra Basin, India; The Leading Edge 25 882–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S P 1994 Resolution of fine 1-D structures employing individual and joint inversion of electrical and electromagnetic data. Ph.D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, 181pp.

  • Spangenberg E 1998 A fractal model for physical properties of porous rock: Theoretical formulations and application to elastic properties; J. Geophys. Res. 103 12,269–12,289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma S K and Sharma S P 1993 Resolution of thin layers using joint-inversion of electromagnetic and DC sounding data; J. EM Waves and Appl. 7 443–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma S K and Sri Niwas 1994 Comparison of the deep resistivity, magnetotelluric and deep TEM methods in the delineation of conducting sediments below high velocity lava flows; J. Assoc. Expl. Geophys. 15 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vozoff K and Jupp D L B 1975 Joint inversion of geophysical data; Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 42 977–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren R K 1996 A few case histories of subsurface imaging with EMAP as aid to seismic prospecting and interpretation; Geophys. Prosp. 44 923–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers R, Eggers D, Fox T and Crebs T 1994 A case study of integrated hydrocarbon exploration through basalt; Geophysics 59 1666–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yale D P 1985 Recent advances in rock physics; Geophysics 50 2480–2491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Manglik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manglik, A., Verma, S.K. & Singh, K.H. Detection of sub-basaltic sediments by a multi-parametric joint inversion approach. J Earth Syst Sci 118, 551–562 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-009-0043-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-009-0043-4

Keywords

Navigation