Skip to main content
Log in

A possible molecular metric for biological evolvability

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proteins manifest themselves as phenotypic traits, retained or lost in living systems via evolutionary pressures. Simply put, survival is essentially the ability of a living system to synthesize a functional protein that allows for a response to environmental perturbations (adaptation). Loss of functional proteins leads to extinction. Currently there are no universally applicable quantitative metrics at the molecular level for either measuring ‘evolvability’ of life or for assessing the conditions under which a living system would go extinct and why. In this work, we show emergence of the first such metric by utilizing the recently discovered stoichiometric margin of life for all known naturally occurring (and functional) proteins. The constraint of having well-defined stoichiometries of the 20 amino acids in naturally occurring protein sequences requires utilization of the full scope of degeneracy in the genetic code, i.e. usage of all codons coding for an amino acid, by only 11 of the 20 amino acids. This shows that the non-availability of individual codons for these 11 amino acids would disturb the fine stoichiometric balance resulting in non-functional proteins and hence extinction. Remarkably, these amino acids are found in close proximity of any given amino acid in the backbones of thousands of known crystal structures of folded proteins. On the other hand, stoichiometry of the remaining 9 amino acids, found to be farther/distal from any given amino acid in backbones of folded proteins, is maintained independent of the number of codons available to synthesize them, thereby providing some robustness and hence survivability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Casanueva A, Tuffin M, Cary C and Cowan DA 2010 Molecular adaptations to psychrophily: the impact of ‘omic’ technologies. Trends Microbiol. 18 374–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F 1970 Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227 561–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ermolaeva MD 2001 Synonymous codon usage in bacteria. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 3 91–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberg R and Petrov DA 2008 Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42 287–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram B 1997 Beyond the wobble: the rule of conjugates. J. Mol. Evol. 45 704–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khorana HG, Büchi H, Ghosh H, Gupta N, Jacob TM, Kössel H, Morgan R, Narang SA, Ohtsuka E and Wells RD 1966 Polynucleotide synthesis and the genetic code. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 31 39–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim I-W, Sauna ZE, Calcagno AM, Ambudkar SV and Gottesman MM 2007 A ‘silent’ polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315 525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M 1968 Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217 624–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King JL and Jukes TH 1969 Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164 788–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RD, Freeland SJ and Landweber LF 2001 A simple model based on mutation and selection explains trends in codon and amino-acid usage and GC composition within and across genomes. Genome Biol. 2 research0010.1–research0010.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komar AA 2007 SNPs, Silent but not invisible. Science 315 466–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mezei M 2011 Discriminatory power of stoichiometry-driven protein folding? J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 28 625–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal A and Jayaram B 2011a The newest view on protein folding: Stoichiometric and spatial unity in structural and functional diversity. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 28 669–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal A and Jayaram B 2011b Backbones of folded proteins reveal novel invariant amino acid neighborhoods. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 28 443–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal A, Jayaram B, Shenoy SR and Bawa TS 2010 A stoichiometry driven universal spatial organization of backbones of folded proteins: Are there Chargaff’s rules for protein folding? J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 28 133–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nirenberg M, Leder P, Bernfield M, Brimacombe R, Trupin J, Rottman F and O'Neal C 1965 RNA codewords and protein synthesis, VII. On the general nature of the RNA code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 53 1161–1168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma RH 2011 A conversation on protein folding. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 28 587–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Hasija V, Naresh M and Mittal A 2008 Functional control by codon bias in magnetic bacteria. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 4 44–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer GA and Hickey DA 2003 Thermophilic prokaryotes have characteristic patterns of codon usage, amino acid composition and nucleotide content. Gene 317 39–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weygand-Durasevic I and Ibba M 2010 New roles for codon usage. Science 329 1473–1474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yampolsky LY and Stoltzfus A 2005 The exchangeability of amino acids in proteins. Genetics 170 1459–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Jiang Y and He F 2009 An integrated view of the correlations between genomic and phenomic variables. J. Genet. Genomics 36 645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Saha S, Shabalina SA and Kashina A 2010 Differential arginylation of actin isoforms is regulated by coding sequence–dependent degradation. Science 329 1534–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya Mittal.

Additional information

[Mittal A and Jayaram B 2012 A possible molecular metric for biological evolvability. J. Biosci. 37 1–5] DOI

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittal, A., Jayaram, B. A possible molecular metric for biological evolvability. J Biosci 37, 573–577 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-012-9210-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-012-9210-x

Keywords

Navigation