Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
A 32-year-old female was admitted in Neuro Intensive Care of Policlinico “A. Gemelli” in Rome after bleeding from artero-venous malformation and ventriculostomy. After 6 days, the patient was awake (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 14;E4,V4,M6), and external ventricular drainage was removed. Two days after, she deteriorated (GCS 11;E3,V3,M5); a brain sonography was performed by a neuro-intensive care unit (ICU) resident, and the exam was considered normal. According to our policy for residents training, echography was immediately repeated by an expert neurosonologist (Anselmo Caricato), and in a mesencephalic plane, two central pulsating hyperechoic lines were observed (Fig. 1a). They were wrongly considered as third ventricle. Actually, in a diencephalic plane, third ventricle was dilated, and in a ventricular plane, frontal horns of lateral ventricles were enlarged (Fig. 1b, ESM). A CT scan was obtained (Fig. 1c), and ventriculostomy was immediately performed.
Brain sonography is a non-invasive monitoring method, and clinical applications have been described in several settings: it may be useful for bedside hematoma assessment, for midline shift evaluation, for diagnosis of hydrocephalus [1,2,3,4]. In particular, a good correlation has been observed between sonography and CT scan measurements of the width of the third ventricle, right and left frontal horns [5]. Furthermore, transcranial Doppler is recommended for vasospasm assessment after subarachnoid hemorrhage, and may be used for a non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressure [6, 7]. A recent review focused on indications and methods of this technique [8].
In our opinion, it is an excellent method for bedside diagnosis of hydrocephalus. It has a strong potential in neurointensive care, where early diagnosis is crucial, and transport to CT scan may be difficult and potentially dangerous. Ultrasound temporal window is generally good; Seidel was not able to visualize third ventricle for acoustic limitations in 7% of cases [5].
Actually, diagnosis of hydrocephalus requires expertise and hands-on training. In particular, cerebral ventricles can be often localized only by identification of ependyma, as two parallel pulsating hyperechoic lines, and not by visualization of cerebral spinal fluid; unfortunately, parallel hyperechoic lines are frequently observed in cerebral parenchyma, and can be incorrectly interpreted. If we exclude emergency procedures, we always recommend brain CT to confirm ultrasound data before ventriculostomy.
A comprehensive knowledge and a rigorous application of the method are of paramount importance for a correct identification of cerebral ventricles. By transtemporal window, brain ultrasound should be first performed identifying mesencephalic structures in an axial plane; in this view, basal cerebral arteries can be visualized, and color mode can be a simple tool helping in plane identification. Then, the probe should be tilted 10° cranially in a diencephalic plane, and third ventricle can be observed. This creates an error in the measurement of the transverse diameter of the ventricle, which, however, is generally acceptable; a further cranial inclination allows the identification of the lateral ventricles and of the thalamus, but generates an error in the measurement of the transverse diameter of the lateral ventricle which may not be negligible. This should be considered, in particular if we want to obtain a measurement of transverse diameter of frontal horn of contralateral ventricle. A complete exam requires the study of mesencephalic, diencephalic and ventricular plane.
In our case, the mistake was caused by an incorrect identification of insonation planes, and by a not complete execution of the exam. In fact, third ventricle cannot be observed in a mesencephalic plane, and two parallel pulsating hyperechoic lines corresponded to a dilated cerebral aqueduct, and not to third ventricle. In patients without hydrocephalus, cerebral aqueduct is generally not visible by ultrasound. By simply tilting the probe 10° cranially, the dilated third ventricle could be observed.
In conclusion, hydrocephalus can be bedside observed by brain ultrasound, but requires expertise. By using a transtemporal window, a correct identification of plane of insonation is mandatory. It has always to be performed according a systematic approach that includes a complete examination of mesencephalic, diencephalic and ventricular plane.
So far, unlike in other fields such as echocardiography, certification of competences in brain ultrasound by intensive care medicine societies is lacking [9]. In our University hospital, brain ultrasound is included in critical care training program for residents; we believe that it should not be considered only as a useful adjunct, but a standard competence of critical care specialist.
References
Perez ES, Delgado-Mederos R, Rubiera M, et al. Transcranial duplex sonography for monitoring hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2009;40:987–90.
Caricato A, Mignani V, Sandroni C, et al. Bedside detection of acute epidural hematoma by transcranial sonography in a head-injured patient. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1091–2.
Llompart Pou JA, Abadal Centellas JM, Palmer Sans M, et al. Monitoring midline shift by transcranial color-coded sonography in traumatic brain injury. A comparison with cranial computerized tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1672–5.
Kiphuth IC, Huttner HB, Struffert T, et al. Sonographic monitoring of ventricle enlargement in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Neurology. 2011;76:858–62.
Seidel G, Kaps M, Gerriets T, et al. Evaluation of the ventricular system in adults by transcranial duplex sonography. J Neuroimaging. 1995;5:105–8.
Mastantuono J-M, Combescure C, Elia N, et al. Transcranial Doppler in the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm: an updated meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:1665–722.
Rasulo F, Bertuetti R, Robba C, et al. The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in excluding intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury: a multicenter prospective pilot study. Crit Care. 2017;21:44.
Robba C, Goffi A, Geeraerts T, et al. Brain ultrasonography: methodology, basic and advanced principles and clinical applications. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:913–27.
Robba C, Poole D, Citerio G, et al. Brain ultrasonography consensus on skill recommendations and competence levels within the critical care setting. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32:502–11.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AC and EI were involved in study design. CG was involved in data collection. All authors drafted and critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval/Informed consent
The authors confirm that they have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines. Written consent from the patient was waived, because of entirely anonymized images from which the individual cannot be identified.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MOV 22677 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Caricato, A., Ioannoni, E. & Gelormini, C. Is It Really Third Ventricle? A Pitfall in the Diagnosis of Hydrocephalus by Brain Ultrasound. Neurocrit Care 33, 844–846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01060-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01060-9