Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of Resistant Organisms and Clostridium difficile with Prolonged Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Central Nervous System Devices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prolonged systemic antibiotic prophylaxis for central nervous system (CNS) devices may be associated with increased risk of antimicrobial resistance. The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of prolonged CNS device antibiotic prophylaxis on the growth of resistant microorganisms and Clostridium difficile.

Methods

This retrospective, observational, cohort study included patients admitted to intensive care units with traumatic brain injury or other neurocritical illness. Patients who received a CNS device and antibiotic prophylaxis for at least 72 h were compared to patients with similar neurologic injuries who did not receive a CNS device.

Results

Study (n = 116) and control (n = 557) patients had mean APACHE II scores of 17.7 ± 9.2 and 15.1 ± 10.6 (p = 0.004) with 53.4 and 24.6 % receiving craniotomies (p < 0.001), respectively. Mean CNS device duration was 9.9 days, and 73 % of patients received cefuroxime for prophylaxis. The study cohort had a higher absolute incidence of resistant organisms compared with the control cohort (15.5 vs 4.1 %; odds ratio 1.93, 95 % CI 0.93–4.03, p = 0.078), though the study was underpowered to show statistical significance in multivariate analysis. C. difficile incidence was similar between groups (2.6 vs 2.0 %; odds ratio 1.45, 95 % CI 0.35–6.12, p = 0.61).

Conclusion

We found a higher incidence of resistant organisms in patients receiving prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis with a CNS device, but similar incidence of C. difficile compared to controls. Lack of data supporting prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis for CNS devices and the risk of nosocomial infections with resistant organisms encourage limiting prophylactic antibiotics to a short periprocedural course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helmy A, Vizcaychipi M, Gupta AK. Traumatic brain injury: intensive care management. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(1):32–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(9):553–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S, et al. Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JH, Desai NS, Ricci J, et al. Factors contributing to ventriculostomy infection. World Neurosurg. 2012;77(1):135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stenehjem E, Armstrong WS. Central nervous system device infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26(1):89–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramanan M, Lipman J, Shorr A, Shankar A. A meta-analysis of ventriculostomy-associated cerebrospinal fluid infections. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;8(15):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(1):170–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Camacho EF, Boszczowski I, Basso M, et al. Infection rate and risk factors associated with infections related to external ventricular drain. Infection. 2011;39(1):47–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Citerio G, Signorini L, Bronco A, et al. External ventricular and lumbar drain device infections in ICU patients: a prospective multicenter Italian study. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1630–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IV. Infection prophylaxis. J Neurotrauma 2007;24(suppl 1):S26–31.

  12. Rebuck JA, Murry KR, Rhoney DH, Michael DB, Coplin WM. Infection related to intracranial pressure monitors in adults: analysis of risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:381–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alleyne CH, Hassan M, Zabramski JM. The efficacy and cost of prophylactic and periprocedural antibiotics in patients with external ventricular drains. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:1124–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Poon WS, Ng S, Wai S. CSF antibiotic prophylaxis for neurosurgical patients with ventriculostomy: a randomised study. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dellit TH, Chan JD, Fulton C, et al. Reduction in Clostridium difficile infections among neurosurgical patients associated with discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis for the duration of external ventricular drain placement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;25(5):589–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs DG, Westerband A. Antibiotic prophylaxis for intracranial pressure monitors. J Natl Med Assoc. 1998;90:417–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Flibotte JJ, Lee KE, Koroshetz WJ, et al. Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis and cerebral spinal fluid infection in patients with intracranial pressure monitors. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1:61–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. May AK, Fleming SB, Carpenter RO, et al. Influence of broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis on intracranial pressure monitor infections and subsequent infectious complications in head injured patients. Surg Infect. 2006;7:409–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCarthy PJ, Patil S, Conrad SA, Scott LK. International and specialty trends in the use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infectious complications after insertion of external ventricular drainage devices. Neurocrit Care. 2010;12(2):220–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prabhu VC, Kaufman HH, Voelker JL, Aronoff SC, Niewiadomska-Bugaj M, Mascara S, Hobbs GR. Prophylactic antibiotics with intracranial pressure monitors and external ventricular drains: a review of the evidence. Surg Neurol. 1999;52(3):226–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ramon Castillo III for his role in data extraction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Chauv.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chauv, S., Fontaine, G.V., Hoang, Q.P. et al. Risk of Resistant Organisms and Clostridium difficile with Prolonged Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Central Nervous System Devices. Neurocrit Care 25, 128–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-016-0254-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-016-0254-x

Keywords

Navigation