Skip to main content
Log in

Trajectory of Functional Recovery After Hospital Discharge for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although there are extensive data on long-term disability after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), there are few data on the trajectory of functional recovery after hospital discharge.

Methods

From October 2009 to April 2010, we prospectively followed consecutive patients with non-traumatic SAH discharged from a university hospital. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were calculated at discharge from chart review and at 6 months by standardized telephone interview. Good functional status was defined as a mRS score of 0–2, and poor status as an mRS score of 3–6. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the trajectory of functional recovery and determine the proportion of patients whose functional status improved from poor to good.

Results

Among 52 patients with non-traumatic SAH (79 % aneurysmal) who were discharged alive, most (71 %) were discharged home. Median (IQR) mRS score was 3 (2–4) at discharge and 2 (1–2) at 6 months. Some functional recovery (any improvement in mRS score) was seen in most patients (83 %; 95 % CI, 72–93 %). Of the 28 patients with poor functional status at discharge, 16 (57 %) improved to good functional status at 6 months. All patients with Hunt–Hess grade 4 or 5 hemorrhages (n = 14) had poor functional status at discharge, but half (95 % CI, 20–80 %) recovered to a good functional status at 6 months.

Conclusions

Although our sample size is small, our findings suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with SAH who are disabled at discharge go on to regain functional independence within 6 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suarez JI, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:387–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A, Linn FH, de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJ. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:635–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010;41:e519–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haug T, Sorteberg A, Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF, Lundar T, Finset A. Cognitive outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: time course of recovery and relationship to clinical, radiological, and management parameters. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:649–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Springer MV, Schmidt JM, Wartenberg KE, Frontera JA, Badjatia N, Mayer SA. Predictors of global cognitive impairment 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:1043–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rinkel GJ, Algra A. Long-term outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayer SA, Kreiter KT, Copeland D, et al. Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2002;59:1750–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg. 1988;68:985–986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hijdra A, van Gijn J, Nagelkerke NJ, Vermeulen M, van Crevel H. Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1988;19:1250–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreiter KT, Copeland D, Bernardini GL, et al. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2002;33:200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer B, Ringel F, Winter Y, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yarlagadda S, Rajendran P, Miss JC, et al. Cardiovascular predictors of in-patient mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2006;5:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Longstreth WT Jr, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Clinical course of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a population-based study in King County, Washington. Neurology. 1993;43:712–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roos YB, de Haan RJ, Beenen LF, Groen RJ, Albrecht KW, Vermeulen M. Complications and outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective hospital based cohort study in the Netherlands. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68:337–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Navi BB, Kamel H, McCulloch CE, et al. Accuracy of neurovascular fellows’ prognostication of outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43:702–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lowenstein SR. Medical record reviews in emergency medicine: the blessing and the curse. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:452–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wunsch H, Gershengorn H, Mayer SA, Claassen J. The effect of window rooms on critically ill patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted to intensive care. Crit Care. 2011;15:R81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Changes in functional outcome and quality of life in patients and caregivers after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:957–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mees SM, Algra A, Vandertop WP, et al. Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:44–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C, et al. Improving modified Rankin Scale assessment with a simplified questionnaire. Stroke. 2010;41:1048–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dombovy ML, Drew-Cates J, Serdans R. Recovery and rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Part I: outcome after inpatient rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1998;12:443–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak B. Navi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navi, B.B., Kamel, H., Claude Hemphill, J. et al. Trajectory of Functional Recovery After Hospital Discharge for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 17, 343–347 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9772-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9772-3

Keywords

Navigation