Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Patients Die After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Severity of illness scores predict all-cause mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but do not differentiate between proximate mechanisms or predict the timing. We hypothesized that death by neurologic criteria [brain death (BD)], withdrawal of life support, and cardiovascular death would be distinct after ICH.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with spontaneous ICH without underlying vascular malformation or neoplasm. We recorded clinical data and the proximate mechanism of death (BD, withdrawal of life support, cardiovascular death, or other cause). Time to death was compared with Kaplan–Meier methods (log-rank test). Data are median (IQR).

Results

Among 89 patients, 15 had withdrawal of life support, 5 had BD, 2 died from cardiac arrest, and 3 died from other causes. Among patients who died, ICH score, age, Glasgow Coma Scale, NIH Stroke Scale, and proximate cause were not associated with the proximate mechanism of death. The time to death was different (P < 0.001) depending on the proximate mechanism. Patients with BD died 1 [0–1] 1 day after ICH, withdrawal of life support led to death 5 [1–13] days after ICH, cardiac death occurred 35 [35–85] days after ICH, and other causes led to death 33 [26–33] days after ICH. Among patients where life support was withdrawn, a higher ICH score on admission was related to earlier death (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Proximate mechanisms of death after ICH occur at distinct times. Withdrawal of life support leads to earlier death in patients with a higher severity of injury. Medical causes of death can be effectively prevented after ICH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker K, Baxter A, Cohen W, Bybee H, Tirschwell D, Newell D, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56:766–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameters for determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 1995;45:1012–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hays A, Diringer MN. Elevated troponin levels are associated with higher mortality following intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:1330–4. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000210523.22944.9b.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Diringer MN, Edwards D, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H. Factors associated with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1792–7. doi:10.1097/00003246-200109000-00023.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology. 1999;52:1602–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Helft P, Siegler M, Lantos J. The rise and fall of the futility movement. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:293–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM200007273430411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brott T, Adams H, CP O, Marler J, WG B, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Claude Hemphill J, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC, Tuhrim S. The ICH score: A simple reliable grading scale intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:891–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Barsan WG, Sauerbeck LR, M Z, et al. The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke. 1996;27:1304–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson C, Huang Y, Wang J, Arima H, Neal B, Peng B, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): A randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:391–9. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70069-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marotta CA, Banks JL. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: A literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:1091–6. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hemphill JC, Newman J, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Hospital usage of early do-not-resuscitate orders and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35:1130–4. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000125858.71051.ca.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diringer MN, Edwards D. Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:635–40. doi:10.1097/00003246-200103000-00031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Varelas PN, Conti MM, Spanaki MV, Potts E, Bradford D, Sunstrom C, et al. The impact of a neurointensivist-led team on a semiclosed neurosciences intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2191–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernat JL. Areas of consensus in withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in the neurointensive care unit. Neurology. 1999;52:1538.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. White DB, Curtis JR, Lo B, John M, Luce M. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2053–9. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boissy AR, Ford PJ, Edgell RC, Furlan AJ. Ethics consultations in stroke and neurological disease: A 7-year retrospective review. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(3):394–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rost NS, Smith EE, Chang Y, Snider RW, Chanderraj R, Schwab K, et al. Prediction of functional outcome in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage. The FUNC score. Stroke. 2008;39(8):2304–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flemming K, Wijdicks E, Li H. Can we predict poor outcome at presentation in patients with lobar hemorrhage? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11:183–9. doi:10.1159/000047636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weimar C, Benemann J, Diener HC, German Stroke Study Collaboration. Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:601–5. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.081117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuhrim S, Dambrosia JM, Price TR, Mohr JP, Wolf PA, Hier DB, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage: External validation and extension of a model for prediction of 30-day survival. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:658–63. doi:10.1002/ana.410290614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke. 1993;24:987–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Andrew M. Naidech has received research support from NovoNordisk and the Northwestern Memorial Foundation unrelated to this work, and speaker fees from EKR Therapeutics (unrelated to this work).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew M. Naidech.

Additional information

All persons who significantly contributed to the manuscript are listed as the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naidech, A.M., Bernstein, R.A., Bassin, S.L. et al. How Patients Die After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 11, 45–49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9186-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9186-z

Keywords

Navigation