Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical characteristics and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage in young adults

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data on determinants of prognosis after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in young adults are scarce. Our aim was to identify clinical determinants of prognosis after ICH in adults aged 18–50. We investigated 98 consecutive patients with an ICH, aged 18–50 years, admitted to our hospital between 1980 and 2010. Collected ICH characteristics included presenting symptoms, etiology, location, severity and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Outcomes were case-fatality (death within 30 days), poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2), long-term mortality and recurrent ICH. We assessed discriminatory power of factors associated with case-fatality [area under receiver operating curve (AUC)]. Case-fatality was 20.4 % (n = 20) and well predicted by the GCS (AUC 0.83). Among 30-day survivors, a poor functional outcome at discharge was present in 51.3 %. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 years mortality was only increased in patients aged 40–50 years [standardized mortality ratio 4.8 (95 % CI 2.3–8.6)], but not in patients aged 18–40 years. Recurrent ICH occurred in 6 patients [10-year cumulative incidence 12.2 % (95 % CI 1.5–22.9 %)], all with the index ICH attributable to structural vascular malformations. Prognosis after ICH in young adults is poor, mainly due to high case-fatality, that is well predicted by the GCS. An exception is 30-day survivors <40 years, who have a similar risk of dying as the general population. Recurrence risk is especially present in patients with structural vascular malformations, whereas risk seems to be very low in other patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ (2010) Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 9(2):167–176. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bevan H, Sharma K, Bradley W (1990) Stroke in young adults. Stroke 21(3):382–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai SL, Chen ST, Lee TH, Ro LS, Hsu SP (2005) Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in young adults. Eur J Neurol 12(4):310–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Cantu C, Barinagarrementeria F (1999) Intracerebral hemorrhage in young people: analysis of risk factors, location, causes, and prognosis. Stroke 30(3):537–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutten-Jacobs LC, Arntz RM, Maaijwee NA, Schoonderwaldt HC, Dorresteijn LD, van Dijk EJ, de Leeuw FE (2013) Long-term mortality after stroke among adults aged 18 to 50 years. JAMA 309(11):1136–1144. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zia E, Engstrom G, Svensson PJ, Norrving B, Pessah-Rasmussen H (2009) Three-year survival and stroke recurrence rates in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 40(11):3567–3573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutten-Jacobs LC, Maaijwee NA, Arntz RM, Van Alebeek ME, Schaapsmeerders P, Schoonderwaldt HC, Dorresteijn LD, Overeem S, Drost G, Janssen MC, van Heerde WL, Kessels RP, Zwiers MP, Norris DG, van der Vlugt MJ, van Dijk EJ, de Leeuw FE (2011) Risk factors and prognosis of young stroke. The FUTURE study: a prospective cohort study. Study rationale and protocol. BMC Neurol 11(1):109. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-109

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T (1980) Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 58(1):113–130

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hatano S (1976) Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ 54(5):541–553

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer HH, Hondo H, Hanley DF (2001) Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. New Engl J Med 344(19):1450–1460. doi:10.1056/NEJM200105103441907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC 3rd, Anderson C, Becker K, Broderick JP, Connolly ES Jr, Greenberg SM, Huang JN, MacDonald RL, Messe SR, Mitchell PH, Selim M, Tamargo RJ, American Heart Association Stroke C, Council on Cardiovascular N (2010) Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 41(9):2108–2129. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3181ec611b

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2(7872):81–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19(5):604–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rutten-Jacobs LC, Maaijwee NA, Arntz RM, Schoonderwaldt HC, Dorresteijn LD, van der Vlugt MJ, van Dijk EJ, de Leeuw FE (2013) Long-term risk of recurrent vascular events after young stroke: the FUTURE study. Ann Neurol 74(4):592–601. doi:10.1002/ana.23953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization (1992) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2010) MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods 7(8):575–576. doi:10.1038/nmeth0810-575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II—The design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ 82:1–406

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gray RJ (1988) A class of K-Sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 16(3):1141–1154. doi:10.1214/aos/1176350951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beslow LA, Licht DJ, Smith SE, Storm PB, Heuer GG, Zimmerman RA, Feiler AM, Kasner SE, Ichord RN, Jordan LC (2010) Predictors of outcome in childhood intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective consecutive cohort study. Stroke 41(2):313–318

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fullerton HJ, Wu YW, Sidney S, Johnston SC (2007) Recurrent hemorrhagic stroke in children: a population-based cohort study. Stroke 38(10):2658–2662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meretoja A, Strbian D, Putaala J, Curtze S, Haapaniemi E, Mustanoja S, Sairanen T, Satopaa J, Silvennoinen H, Niemela M, Kaste M, Tatlisumak T (2012) SMASH-U: a proposal for etiologic classification of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 43(10):2592–2597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marini C, Totaro R, De Santis F, Ciancarelli I, Baldassarre M, Carolei A (2001) Stroke in young adults in the community-based L’Aquila registry: incidence and prognosis. Stroke 32(1):52–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC (2001) The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 32(4):891–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Chiquete E, Romero-Vargas S, Padilla-Martinez JJ, Gonzalez-Cornejo S (2007) Grading scale for prediction of outcome in primary intracerebral hemorrhages. Stroke 38(5):1641–1644. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.478222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parry-Jones AR, Abid KA, Di Napoli M, Smith CJ, Vail A, Patel HC, King AT, Tyrrell PJ (2013) Accuracy and clinical usefulness of intracerebral hemorrhage grading scores: a direct comparison in a UK population. Stroke 44(7):1840–1845. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huhtakangas J, Lopponen P, Tetri S, Juvela S, Saloheimo P, Bode MK, Hillbom M (2013) Predictors for recurrent primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective population-based study. Stroke 44(3):585–590. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.671230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vermeer SE, Algra A, Franke CL, Koudstaal PJ, Rinkel GJ (2002) Long-term prognosis after recovery from primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 59(2):205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standard

This study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The medical review ethics committee region Arnhem-Nijmegen approved the study and granted a waiver of consent to collect information on vital status and cause of death. Participants provided written informed consent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank-Erik de Leeuw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rutten-Jacobs, L.C., Maaijwee, N.A., Arntz, R.M. et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage in young adults. J Neurol 261, 2143–2149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7469-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7469-6

Keywords

Navigation