Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Different Forms of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Selenium Deposition, and Antioxidant Property in Broilers

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different sources of dietary selenium (Se) supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, Se deposition, and antioxidant property in broilers. A total of 600 one-day-old Ross 308 broilers with an average body weight (BW) of 44.30 ± 0.49 g were randomly allotted to three treatments, each of which included five replicates of 40 birds. These three groups received the same basal diet containing 0.04 mg Se/kg, supplemented with 0.15 mg Se/kg from sodium selenite (SS) or from l-selenomethionine (l-Se-methionine (Met)) or from d-selenomethionine (d-Se-Met). The experiment lasted 42 days. Both Se source and time significantly influenced (p < 0.01) drip loss of breast muscle. Supplementation with l-Se-Met and d-Se-Met were more effective (p < 0.05) in decreasing drip loss than SS. Besides, the pH value of breast muscle was also significantly influenced (p < 0.05) by time. The SS-supplemented diet increased more (p < 0.05) liver, kidney, and pancreas glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities than the d-Se-Met-supplemented diet. In addition, l-Se-Met increased more (p < 0.01) liver and pancreas GSH-Px activities than d-Se-Met. The antioxidant status was greatly improved in broilers of l-Se-Met-treated group in comparison with the SS-treated group and was illuminated by the increased glutathione (GSH) concentration in serum, liver, and breast muscle (p < 0.05); superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in liver (p < 0.01); total antioxidant capability (T-AOC) in kidney, pancreas, and breast muscle (p < 0.05) and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in kidney and breast muscle (p < 0.05) of broilers. Besides, supplementation with d-Se-Met was more effective (p < 0.01) in increasing serum GSH concentration and decreasing breast muscle MDA concentration than SS. l-Selenomethionine supplementation significantly increased GSH concentration in liver and breast muscle (p < 0.05); SOD activity in liver (p < 0.01); and T-AOC in liver, pancreas, and breast muscle (p < 0.05) of broilers, compared with broilers fed d-Se-Met diet. The addition of l-Se-Met and d-Se-Met increased (p < 0.01) Se concentration in serum and different organs studied of broilers in comparision with broilers fed SS diet. Therefore, dietary l-Se-Met and d-Se-Met supplementation could improve antioxidant capability and Se deposition in serum and tissues and reduce drip loss of breast muscle in broilers compared with SS. Besides, l-Se-Met is more effective than d-Se-Met in improving antioxidant status in broilers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahan DC, Cline TR, Richert B (1999) Effects of dietary levels of selenium enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing—finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics and loin quality. J Anim Sci 77:2172–2179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahmoud KZ, Edens FW (2003) Influence of selenium sources on age related and mild heat stress-related changes of blood and liver glutathione redox cycle in broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 136(4):921–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YY, Mahan DC (2001) Comparative effects of high dietary levels of organic and inorganic Se on Se toxicity of growing finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 79:942–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuricova S, Boldizarova K, Gresakova L, Bobcek R, Levkut M, Lenk L (2003) Chicken selenium status when fed a diet supplemented with Se-yeast. Acta Vet 72:339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whanger PD (2002) Selenocompounds in plants and animals and their biological significance. J Am Coll Nutr 21(3):223–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cukierski MJ, Willhite CC, Lasley BL, Hendrie TA, Book SA, Cox DN, Hendrickx AG (1989) 30-day oral toxicity study of l-selenomethionine in female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Fund Appl Toxicol 13:26–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maier KJ, Foe CG, Knight AW (1993) Comparative toxicity of selenate, selenite, seleno-dl-methionine, and seleno-dl-cystine to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:755–763

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mruk DD, Silvestrini B, Mo MY, Cheng CY (2002) Antioxidant superoxide dismutase-a review: its function, regulation in the testis, and role in male fertility. Contraception 65(4):305–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhan XA, Wang M, Zhao RQ, Li WF, Xu ZR (2007) Effects of different selenium source on selenium distribution, loin quality and antioxidant status in finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 132:202–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choct M, Naylor AJ, Reinke N (2004) Selenium supplementation affects broiler growth performance, meat yield and feather coverage. Br Poult Sci 45:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Choct M, Naylor AJ (2004) The effect of dietary selenium source and vitamin E levels on performance of male broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 17:1000–1006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cantor AH, Moorehead PD, Musser MA (1982) Comparative effects of sodium selenite and selenomethionine upon nutritional muscular dystrophy, selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase, and tissue selenium concentrations of turkey poults. Poult Sci 61:478–484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990) Official method of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pi ZK, Wu YM, Liu JX (2005) Effect of pretreatment and pelletization on nutritive value of rice straw-based total mixed ration, and growth performance and meat quality of growing Boer goats fed on TMR. Small Rumin Res 56:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. James BW, Goodband RD, Unruh JA, Tokach MD, Nelssen JL, Dritz SS, O’Quinn PR, Andrews BS (2002) Effect of creatine monohydrate on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 96:135–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasmussen AJ, Andersson M (1996) New method for determination of drip loss in pork muscles. In: Proc 42nd Int Congr Meat Sci Technol. pp. 286–287

  18. Ga’miz-Gracia L, de Castro MD Luque (1999) Determination of selenium in nutritional supplements and shampoos by flow injection-hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Talanta 50:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawrence RA, Burk RF (1976) Glutathione pcroxidase activity in selenium-deficient rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 71:952–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Panckenko LF, Brusov OS, Gerasimov AM, Loktaeva AE (1975) Intramitochondrial localization and release of rat liver superoxide dismutase. FEBS Lett 55:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beutler E, Duron O, Kelly BM (1963) Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J Lab Clin Med 61:882–888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Placer ZA, Cushman LL, Johnson BC (1966) Estimation of product of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde) in biochemical systems. Anal Biochem 16:359–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Edens FW, Parkhurst CR, Havenstein GB (2001) Housing and selenium influences on feathering on broilers. J Appl Poult Res 10:128–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cary EE, Allaway WH, Miller M (1973) Utilization of different forms of dietary selenium. J Anim Sci 36:285–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahan DC, Parrett NA (1996) Evaluating the efficacy of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite on tissue selenium retention and serum glutathione peroxidase activity in grower and finisher swine. J Anim Sci 74:2967–2974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolfram S, Berger B, Grenacher B, Scharrer E (1989) Transport of seleno amino acids and their sulphur analogues across the intestinal brush border membrane. J Nutr 119:706–712

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wolfram S, Berger B, Scharrer E (1989b) Transport of selenomethionine and methionine across the intestinal brush border membrane. In: Wendal A (Ed) Selenium in Biology and Medicine. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Selenium in Biology and Medicine. Springer, Berlin. pp. 109–113

  29. Schrauzer GN (2000) Selenomethionine: a review of its nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicity. J Nutr 130:1653–1656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan GL, Huang KH, Zhao YX, Qin SY, Chen F, Hu QH (2007) Effect of selenium source and level in hen’s diet on tissue selenium deposition and egg selenium concentrations. J Agric Food Chem 55:1027–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arthur JR (2000) The glutathione peroxidases. Cell Mol Life Sci 57:1825–1835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kohrle J, Brigelius-Flohe R, Bock A, Gartner R, Meyer O, Flohe L (2000) Se in biology: facts and medical perspectives. Biol Chem 381:849–864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Payne RL, Southern LL (2005) Changes in glutathione peroxidase and tissue selenium concentrations of broilers after consuming a diet adequate in selenium. Poult Sci 84:1268–1276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang ZY, Lin YC, Zhou GL, Luo LH, Jiang SQ, Chen F (2009) Effects of dietary selenomethionine supplementation on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidant property in yellow broilers. J Agric Food Chem 57:9769–9772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Forstrom JW, Zakowski JJ, Tappel AL (1978) Identification of the catalytic site of rat liver glutathione peroxidase as selenocysteine. Biochemistry 17:2639–2644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sunde RA, Hoekstra WG (1980) Incorporation of selenium from selenite into selenocysteine into glutathione peroxidase in the isoloated perfused rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 93:1181–1188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Henry PR, Ammerman CB (1995) Selenium bioavailability. In: Ammerman CB, Baker DH, Lewis AJ (eds) Bioavailability of nutrients for animals. Academic, New York, p 301

    Google Scholar 

  38. White CL, Hoekstra WG (1979) The metabolism of selenite and selenomethionine in mouse fibroblasts grown in tissues culture. Biol Trace Elem Res 1:243–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. den Hertog-Meischke MJA, van Laack RJLM, Smulder FJM (1997) The water-holding capacity of fresh meat. Vet Quest 19:175–181

    Google Scholar 

  40. Macit M, Aksakal V, Emsen E, Esenbuga N, Aksu MI (2003) Effects of vitamin E supplementation on fattening performance, non-carcass components and retail cut percentages, and meat quality traits of Awassi lambs. Meat Sci 64:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Payne RL, Southern LL (2005) Comparison of inorganic and organic selenium sources for broilers. Poult Sci 84:898–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Man EH, Bada JL (1987) Dietary d-amino acids. Annu Rev Nutr 7:209–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sugiyama K, Muramatsu K (1987) Effects of excess d- and l-methionine diets on growth and hepatic enzyme activities in rats. Agric Biol Chem 51(12):3411–3413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hasegawa H, Shinohara Y, Akahane K, Hashimoto T (2005) Direct detection and evaluation of conversion of d-methionine into l-methionine in rats by stable isotope methodology. J Nutr 135:2001–2005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, LeCaptin LJ (1996) Toxicity of seleno-l-methionine, seleno-dl-methionine, high selenium wheat, and selenized yeast to mallard ducklings. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 30:93–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. McAdam PA, Levander OA (1987) Chronic toxicity and retention of dietary selenium fed to rats as d- or l-selenomethionine, selenite, or selenate. Nutr Res 7:601–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. China Feed Database (1999) Table of feed composition and nutritive value in China: 1998 edition. China Feed 4:25–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The financial support provided by the Program for Century Excellent Talents in University (project NECT-07-0758) and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (project NYCYTX-42-G2-06) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiuAn Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zhan, X., Zhang, X. et al. Comparison of Different Forms of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Selenium Deposition, and Antioxidant Property in Broilers. Biol Trace Elem Res 143, 261–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8839-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8839-2

Keywords

Navigation