Abstract
Interactive learning experiences are becoming the standard for today’s ‘tech-savvy’ generation of students and an important issue for research in instructional technology. The design and implementation of higher education, incorporating interactive technologies, can be difficult and often requires high levels of design knowledge. Our intent is to assist researchers, instructors and designers in identifying an effective methodology to design interactive learning contents that use recent interactive technologies, in particular 360° video, and encourage greater student engagement. In this study, 360° videos have been designed and implemented in an engineering program but the design methodology we suggest can be apply in any industrial or educational context. Then, 360° videos have been evaluated by the students as highly immersive and engaged environments that surround them and offer them an increased sense of presence, giving them a 360-degree view of the environment. In this type of video, viewers no longer only look at a single screen, they can point the camera lens wherever they want, allowing viewers to watch the video from multiple perspectives (active), rather than only from the director’s point of view (passive).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Furlong, M.J.: Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol. Schools 45(5), 369–386 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Argyriou, L., Economou, D., Bouki, V. 360-degree interactive video application for Cultural Heritage Education. In: 3rd Annual International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network. Coimbra, Portugal 29 Jun–26 Jul 2017 Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz (2017)
Baddeley, A.D.: Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Psychology Press, Hove (1997)
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Pyke, C.: A taxonomy of student engagement with educational software: an exploration of literate thinking with electronic text. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 24(3), 213–234 (2001)
Barkatsas, A., Kasimatis, K., Gialamas, V.: Learning secondary mathematics with technology: exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Comput. Education 52(3), 562–570 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.001
Baronio, G., Motyl, B., Paderno, D.: Technical drawing learning tool-level 2: an interactive self-learning tool for teaching manufacturing dimensioning. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 24(4), 519–528 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21728
Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R.K., Putri, D.K., Groff, J.: Cueing animations: dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learn. Instr. 25, 71–84 (2013)
Chen, P.-S.D., Lambert, A.D., Guidry, K.R.: Engaging online learners: the impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Comput. Educ. 54(4), 1222–1232 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Wylie, C. (eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. New York (2012)
Coller, B.D., Shernoff, D.J.: Video game-based education in mechanical engineering: a look at student engagement. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 25(2), 308 (2009)
Connell, J. P., Wellborn, J. G. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In Gunnar, M.R., Sroufe, L.A., (eds.) Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 23, pp. 43–77. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, US (1991)
Crowell, T.L.: Student self grading: perception vs reality. Am. J. Educ. Res. 3(4), 450–455 (2015)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York (1997)
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., Whalen, S.: Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
D’mello, S., Graesser, A.: AutoTutor and affective autotutor: learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2(4), 1–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2395123.2395128
DeRobertis, E.M.: The Phenomenology of Learning and Becoming: Enthusiasm, Creativity, and Self-development. Springer, Berlin (2017)
Fischer, X., Nadeau, J.-P.: Research in Interactive Design, vol. 3. Springer, Paris (2011)
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, State of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gallini, J. K., Barron, D.: Participants’ perceptions of web-infused environments: A survey of teaching beliefs, learning approaches, and communication. J. Res. Technol Educ. 34(2), 139–156 (2001)
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Gijselaers, W.: A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: the impact of motivation. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 30(1), 30–50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12020
Guertin, L.A., Zappe, S.E., Kim, H.: Just-in-time teaching exercises to engage students in an introductory-level dinosaur course. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 16(6), 507–514 (2007)
Sellen, A., Rogers, Y., Harper, R., & Rodden, T.: Reflecting human values in the digital age. Commun. ACM, 52(3), 58–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467265
Hedley, N.R., Billinghurst, M., Postner, L., May, R., Kato, H.: Explorations in the use of augmented reality for geographic visualization. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11(2), 119–133 (2002)
Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R.: Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput. Educ. 90, 36–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
Hew, K.F.: Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(2), 320–341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235
Hidi, S.: Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 60(4), 549–571 (1990)
Huang, T.-L., Hsu Liu, F.: Formation of augmented-reality interactive technology’s persuasive effects from the perspective of experiential value. Internet Res. 24(1), 82–109 (2014)
Inan, H.Z., Inan, T.: 3Hs education: examining hands-on, heads-on and hearts-on early childhood science education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 37(12), 1974–1991 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1060369
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., Loken, E.: The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 27(2), 119–132 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Kay, R.: Evaluating learning, design, and engagement in web-based learning tools (WBLTs): the WBLT evaluation scale. Comput. Human Behav. 27(5), 1849–1856 (2011)
King, M.B., Newmann, F., Carmichael, D.: Authentic intellectual work: common standards for teaching social studies. Soc. Educ. 73(1), 43–49 (2009)
Newman, F.M., Wehlage, G.G. and Lamborn, S.D.: The Significance and Sources of Student Engagement. In: Newman, F.M. (eds.) Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, pp. 11–39. Teachers College Press, New York (1992)
Liang, H.-N., Sedig, K.: Can interactive visualization tools engage and support pre-university students in exploring non-trivial mathematical concepts? Comput. Educ. 54(4), 972–991 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.001
Lim, C.P., Nonis, D., Hedberg, J.: Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: engaging students in science lessons. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 37(2), 211–231 (2006)
Mayer, R.E.: Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am. Psychol. 63(8), 760–769 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
Mayer, R. E., Fiore, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. (pp. 279–315). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press
Mayer, R.E., Heiser, J., Lonn, S.: Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: when presenting more material results in less understanding. J. Educ. Psychol. 93(1), 187–198 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
Missett, T.C., Reed, C.B., Scot, T.P., Callahan, C.M., Slade, M.: Describing learning in an advanced online case-based course in environmental science. J. Adv. Acad. 22(1), 10–50 (2010)
Morrison, G.M., Robertson, L., Laurie, B., Kelly, J.: Protective factors related to antisocial behavior trajectories. J. Clin. Psychol. 58(3), 277–290 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10022
Neumann, D. L., Hood, M. The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 25(3) (2009)
Paivio, A.: Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)
Peters, L., Shmerling, S., Karren, R.: Constructivist pedagogy in asynchronous online education: examining proactive behavior and the impact on student engagement levels. Int. J. E-Learning 10(3), 311–330 (2011)
Pintrich, P. R., DeGroot, E. Quantitative and qualitative perspectives on student motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA (1990)
Price, L., Richardson, J. T., Jelfs, A.: Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in distance education. Stud. High. Educ. 32(1), 1–20 (2007)
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., Winteler, A. Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: a meta-analysis of research. In: The role of interest in learning and development. pp. 183–212. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, US (1992)
Schmidt, J. A., Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M. Individual and situational factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence. Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education (pp. 379-405): Springer (2014)
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In: Furlong, M. J., Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, pp. 131–145. Taylor & Francis, Florence, KY (2009)
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., Shernoff, E. S.: Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory.In: Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, pp. 475-494. Springer, Netherlands (2014)
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In: Handbook of Motivation at School, pp. 223–245. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, US (2009)
Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T.A., Furrer, C.J.: A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 69(3), 493–525 (2009)
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R. Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21–44): Springer (2012)
Spence, C., Gallace, A.: Multisensory design: reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychol. Mark. 28(3), 267–308 (2011)
Sun, J.C.Y., Rueda, R.: Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: their impact on student engagement in distance education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(2), 191–204 (2012)
Thompson, J.R., Klass, P.H., Fulk, B.M.: Comparing online and face-to-face presentation of course content in an introductory special education course. Teach. Educ. Special Educ. 35(3), 228–242 (2012)
Vandell, D.L., Shernoff, D.J., Pierce, K.M., Bolt, D.M., Dadisman, K., Brown, B.B.: Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Dir. Stud. Leadersh. 2005(105), 121–129 (2005)
Vergara, D., Rubio, M.P., Lorenzo, M.: On the design of virtual reality learning environments in engineering. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 1(2), 11 (2017)
Vi, C. T., Ablart, D., Gatti, E., Velasco, C., Obrist, M. Not just seeing, but also feeling art: mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 108, 1–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.004
Violante, M.G., Vezzetti, E.: Implementing a new approach for the design of an e-learning platform in engineering education. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 22(4), 708–727 (2014)
Violante, M. G., Vezzetti, E.: Design and implementation of 3D Web-based interactive medical devices for educational purposes. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 11(1), 31–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0277-0
Violante, M.G., Vezzetti, E.: Virtual interactive e-learning application: an evaluation of the student satisfaction. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 23(1), 72–91 (2015)
Violante, M.G., Vezzetti, E.: Guidelines to design engineering education in the twenty-first century for supporting innovative product development. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1293616
Wang, P.-Y., Vaughn, B.K., Liu, M.: The impact of animation interactivity on novices’ learning of introductory statistics. Comput. Educ. 56(1), 300–311 (2011)
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S.: Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 68–81 (2000)
Wittrock, M.C.: Generative processes of comprehension. Educ. Psychol. 24(4), 345–376 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2
Woolf, B.P., Arroyo, I., Cooper, D., Burleson, W., Muldner, K.: Affective tutors: automatic detection of and response to student emotion. In: Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 207–227. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Xu, Y.: Examining the effects of digital feedback on student engagement and achievement. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 43(3), 275–291 (2010)
Yang, Y.-F.: Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 24(2), 181–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538700
Yoon, S.-Y., Choi, Y.J., Oh, H.: User attributes in processing 3D VR-enabled showroom: gender, visual cognitive styles, and the sense of presence. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 82, 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.04.002
Zhu, E.: Interaction and cognitive engagement: an analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instr. Sci. 34(6), 451–480 (2006)
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Erasmus+programme that with the project 2016-1-DK01-KA202-022320 supported this work financially
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Violante, M.G., Vezzetti, E. & Piazzolla, P. Interactive virtual technologies in engineering education: Why not 360° videos?. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13, 729–742 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00553-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00553-y