Skip to main content
Log in

Modern Trunnions Are More Flexible: A Mechanical Analysis of THA Taper Designs

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

There is renewed concern surrounding the potential for corrosion at the modular head-neck junction to cause early failure in contemporary THAs. Although taper corrosion involves a complex interplay of many factors, a previous study suggested that a decrease in flexural rigidity of the femoral trunnion may be associated with an increased likelihood of corrosion at retrieval.

Questions/purposes

By analyzing a large revision retrieval database of femoral stems released during a span of three decades, we asked: (1) how much does flexural rigidity vary among different taper designs; (2) what is the contribution of taper geometry alone to flexural rigidity of the femoral trunnion; and (3) how have flexural rigidity and taper length changed with time in this group of revised retrievals?

Methods

A dual-center retrieval analysis of 85 modular femoral stems released between 1983 and 2012 was performed, and the flexural rigidity and length of the femoral trunnions were determined. These stems were implanted between 1991 and 2012 and retrieved at revision or removal surgery between 2004 and 2012. There were 10 different taper designs made from five different metal alloys from 16 manufacturers. Digital calipers were used to measure taper geometries by two independent observers.

Results

Median flexural rigidity was 228 N-m2; however, there was a wide range of values among the various stems spanning nearly an order of magnitude between the most flexible (80 N-m2) and most rigid (623 N-m2) trunnions, which was partly attributable to the taper geometry and to the material properties of the base alloy. There was a negative correlation between flexural rigidity and length of the trunnion and release date of the stem.

Conclusions

There is wide variability in flexural rigidity of various taper designs, with a trend toward trunnions becoming shorter and less rigid with time.

Clinical Relevance

This temporal trend may partly explain why taper corrosion is being seen with increasing frequency in modern THAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL, Butler RA, Laster DR, Andrews P. Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):8–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Branovacki G. Ortho Atlas: Hip Arthroplasty US Femoral Implants 1938–2008. Chicago, IL: Ortho Atlas Publishing, Inc; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown SA, Abera A, D’Onofrio M, Fleming C. Effects of neck extension, coverage and frequency on the fretting corrosion of modular THR bore and cone interface. In: Marlow DE, Parr JE, Mayor MB, eds. Modularity of Orthopedic Implants. ASTM Special Technical Publication 1301. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1997:189–198.

  4. Brown SA, Flemming CA, Kawalec JS, Placko HE, Vassaux C, Merritt K, Payer JH, Kraay MJ. Fretting corrosion accelerates crevice corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Appl Biomater. 1995;61:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burroughs BR, Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, Wannomae KK, Christensen S, Lozynsky AJ, Harris WH. In vitro comparison of frictional torque and torsional resistance of aged conventional gamma-in-nitrogen sterilized polyethylene versus aged highly crosslinked polyethylene articulating against head sizes larger than 32 mm. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:710–718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clyburn TA. Pseudotumor in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a case report. Reconstr Rev. 2013;3:18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collier JP, Mayor MB, Jensen RE, Surprenant VA, Surprenant HP, McNamar JL, Belec L. Mechanisms of failure of modular prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:129–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collier JP, Mayor MB, Williams IR, Surprenant VA, Surprenant HP, Currier BH. The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;311:91–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;271:305–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Collier JP, Surprenant, VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB, Suprenant HP. Corrosion between the components of modular femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:511–517.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook RB, Bolland BJ, Wharton JA, Tilley S, Latham JM, Wood RJ. Pseudotumour formation due to tribocorrosion at the taper interface of large diameter metal on polymer modular total hip replacements. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1430–1436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Baffes GC, Clemow AJ, Serekian P, Dong N, Kester MA. Wear and corrosion of modular interfaces in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:80–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook SD, Barrack R, Clemow AJ. Corrosion and wear at the modular interface of uncemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:68–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1655–1661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Biologic implications of taper corrosion in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 2012;23:273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dyrkacz RM, Brandt JM, Ojo OA, Turgeon TR, Wyss UP. The influence of head size on corrosion and fretting behaviour at the head-neck interface of artificial hip joints. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1036–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants: a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54:397–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ. In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations: the effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:1533–1544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ, Bertin KC, Zernich MR. Intergranular corrosion-fatigue failure of cobalt-alloy femoral stems: a failure analysis of two implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:110–115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert JL, Mali S. Medical implant corrosion: electrochemistry at metallic biomaterial surfaces. In: Eliaz N, ed. Degradation of Implant Materials. New York, NY: Springer; 2012:1–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert JL, Mehta M, Pinder B. Fretting crevice corrosion of stainless steel stem-CoCr femoral head connections: comparisons of materials, initial moisture, and offset length. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:162–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL. In vitro corrosion testing of modular hip tapers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;64:78–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:149–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1447–1458.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Gilbert JL, Skipor AK, Black J, Jasty M, Galante JO. Local and distant products from modularity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:94–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jauch SY, Huber G, Hoenig E, Baxmann M, Grupp TM, Morlock MM. Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem–neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis. J Biomech. 2011;44:1747–1751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavernia CJ, Baerga L, Barrack RL, Tozakoglou E, Cook SD, Lata L, Rossi MD. The effects of blood and fat on Morse taper disassembly forces. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38:187–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lieberman JR, Rimnac CM, Garvin KL, Klein RW, Salvati EA. An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:162–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindgren JU, Brismar BH, Wikstrom AC. Adverse reaction to metal release from a modular metal-on-polyethylene hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1427–1430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lucas LC, Buchanan RA, Lemons JE. Investigations on the galvanic corrosion of multialloy total hip prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981;15:731–747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mao X, Tay GH, Godbolt DB, Crawford RW. Pseudotumor in a well-fixed metal-on-polyethylene uncemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:493.e13–17.

  32. Meftah M, Nicolaou N, Rodriguez JA. Metal allergy response to femoral head-neck corrosion after total hip replacement. Curr Orthop Pract. 2010;21:530–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodriguez JA, Rathod PA. Large diameter heads: is bigger always better? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 suppl A):52–54.

  34. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Svensson O, Mathiesen EB, Reinholt FP, Blomgren G. Formation of a fulminant soft-tissue pseudotumor after uncemented hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:1238–1242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database. Available at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm. Accessed February 3, 2014.

  37. Urban RM, Tomlinson MJ, Hall DJ, Jacobs JJ. Accumulation in liver and spleen of metal particles generated at nonbearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(8 suppl 3):94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Volz RG. Orthopaedic Device Reference. Breckenridge, CO: Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Walsh AJ, Nikolaou VS, Antoniou J. Inflammatory pseudotumor complicating metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:324.e5–8.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jennifer L. Wright MS (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center) for contributions in performing trunnion measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. John Cooper MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors certifies that he, or a member of his immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, amounts of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (RMU, JAR) from Wright Medical Technology (Arlington, TN, USA); an amount less than USD 10,000 (HJC), and an amount of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JAR) from Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics (Memphis, TN, USA); an amount less than USD 10,000 (RMU), an amount of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JAR), and an amount of USD 100,000 to 1,000,000 (JLG) from DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company (Warsaw, IN, USA); amounts of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (RMU, JJJ, HJC) from Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA); an amount of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JLG) from Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahway, NJ, USA); an amount less than USD 10,000 (RMU) from Spinal Motion (San Antonio, TX, USA); amounts less than USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JJJ, JLG) from Medtronic Sofamor Danek (Memphis, TN, USA); an amount of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JAR) from Medacta (Castel San Pietro, Switzerland); an amount of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JAR) from Exactech Inc (Great Neck, NY, USA); an amount less than USD 10,000 (JJJ) from Implant Protection (Raanana, Israel); and an amount of USD 10,000 to 100,000 (JJJ) from NuVasive (San Diego, CA, USA).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA, and Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porter, D.A., Urban, R.M., Jacobs, J.J. et al. Modern Trunnions Are More Flexible: A Mechanical Analysis of THA Taper Designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 3963–3970 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3965-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3965-3

Keywords

Navigation