Abstract
Background
Continuing efforts have been made to develop minimally invasive surgery techniques for THA. One of the most commonly performed of these techniques is the mini-posterior approach. All reported series using this approach describe surgical detachment of the short external rotators of the hip. In 2008, Penenberg et al. described an innovative surgical technique that preserves the short external rotators. We present the results of a single-incision modification of this technique in 135 patients.
Description of Technique
This technique is based on preservation of all of the short external rotators of the hip with the exception of the piriformis or conjoined tendon. This single-incision technique required the development of specialized instrumentation for exposure and reaming of the acetabulum. The specialized retractors also successfully minimized trauma to the skin and subcutaneous tissue.
Methods
For the 135 patients undergoing THA with this technique, we analyzed demographic and operative data. We recorded complications, evaluated postoperative clinical function using the Harris hip score, and assessed cup abduction angle, cup anteversion, and stem alignment on radiographs. Minimum followup was 14 months (mean, 22 months; range, 14–33 months).
Results
There were no dislocations, no sciatic nerve palsies, no wound complications, and low transfusion rates (8%). The postoperative Harris hip score averaged 96.5 (range, 87–100). Overall acetabular cup abduction angle averaged 41° (range, 21°–49°) and anteversion averaged 21° (range, 15°–27°). Four percent and 2% of femoral components were inserted into more than 2° varus and 2° valgus alignment, respectively.
Conclusions
This technique shows promise as an alternative tissue-sparing method for minimally invasive THA.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432–2438.
Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163–172.
Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, Dorr LD, Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Lieberman JR, Mears DC. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2235–2246.
Bierbaum BE, Callaghan JJ, Galante JO, Rubash HE, Tooms RE, Welch RB. An analysis of blood management in patients having a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:2–10.
Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award. Risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:319–329.
Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153–1160.
Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Burkhart R, Carnahan C, Blair S, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the “bull’s-eye” more accurately. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39:2–6.
Fehring TK, Mason JB. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery: a series of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:711–714.
Goldstein WM, Branson JJ, Berland KA, Gordon AC. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(suppl 4):33–38.
Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:119–129.
Hedley AK, Hendren DH, Mead LP. A posterior approach to the hip joint with complete posterior capsular and muscular repair. J Arthroplasty. 1990;(5 suppl):S57–S66.
Howell JR, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:107–118.
Hungerford DS. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 suppl 1):81–82.
Kao JT, Woolson ST. Piriformis tendon repair after total hip replacement. Orthop Rev. 1992;21:171–174.
Khan RJ, Fick D, Khoo P, Yao F, Nivbrant B, Wood D. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1038–1046.
Kim YH. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1092–1098.
Kim YS, Kwon SY, Sun DH, Han SK, Maloney WJ. Modified posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty to enhance joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:294–299.
Meneghini RM, Smits SA, Swinford RR, Bahamonde RE. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 suppl 1):68–73.
Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701–710.
Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:156–159.
Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1000–1006.
Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:224–228.
Penenberg BL, Bolling WS, Riley M. Percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (PATH): a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(suppl 4):209–220.
Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1920–1927.
Salido JA, Marin LA, Gomez LA, Zorrilla P, Martinez C. Preoperative hemoglobin levels and the need for transfusion after prosthetic hip and knee surgery: analysis of predictive factors [erratum in J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:79]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:216–220.
Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 suppl 1):78–80.
Solomon LB, Lee YC, Callary SA, Beck M, Howie DW. Anatomy of piriformis, obturator internus and obturator externus: implications for the posterior surgical approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1317–1324.
Stähelin T, Drittenbass L, Hersche O, Miehlke W, Munzinger U. Failure of capsular enhanced short external rotator repair after total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:199–204.
Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ. A posterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:162–167.
Vail TP, Mariani EM, Bourne MH, Berger RA, Meneghini RM. Approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(suppl 5):10–12.
Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1031–1043.
Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1353–1358.
Acknowledgments
We thank Pete Bandel and R. Oliver Barrett for technical assistance and Nicole L. Ebarb for assistance with preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
One of the authors certifies that he (DJR), or a member of his immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, in any 1 year, an amount in excess of $100,000.00 from a commercial entity (Greatbatch Medical, Clarence, NY, USA) related to this work. One of the authors certifies that he (DJR), or a member of his immediate family, has patent/licensing arrangements with Greatbatch Medical.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA approval status, of any drug or device before clinical use.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Video 1 (MPG 16148 kb)
Video 2 (MPG 17175 kb)
Video 3 (MPG 13326 kb)
Video 4 (MPG 15250 kb)
Video 5 (MPG 21128 kb)
Video 6 (MPG 23801 kb)
Video 7 (MPG 32174 kb)
Video 8 (MPG 15170 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Roger, D.J., Hill, D. Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Transpiriformis Approach: A Preliminary Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 2227–2234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2225-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2225-z