Abstract
Background
A Total Joint Replacement Registry was developed in a large community-based practice to track implant utilization, monitor revisions and complications, identify patients during recalls and advisories, and provide feedback on clinical practices.
Questions/purposes
We describe the development, implementation, and integration of this Total Joint Replacement Registry, highlighting critical steps in aligning information technology and operations.
Methods
The primary Total Joint Replacement Registry data source consists of standardized electronic health record forms developed by consensus. The Total Joint Replacement Registry forms are integrated into the clinical workflow (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and produce a standardized progress note for electronic health record documentation. Secondary data are extracted from other electronic data sources using standard terminologies (ie, ICD-9 codes) to supplement the Total Joint Replacement Registry forms. Electronic screening algorithms are applied to identify complications, in combination with chart review validation and quality control mechanisms.
Results
Three hundred fifty surgeons voluntarily contribute to the registry with 90% participation. The registry has been used for implant recalls and advisories, contract decision making, and identification of patients at risk for revisions (eg, younger patients having total knee arthroplasty). Tracking of overall survival of implants influenced clinical practice, with feedback resulting in the reduction of the number of unicompartmental and uncemented knee arthroplasties performed, usage of femoral head sizes < 28 mm, and the number of minimally invasive surgical procedures performed.
Conclusions
The Total Joint Replacement Registry has effectively aligned operations with information technology and leveraged that to enhance our ability to respond to recalls and advisories as well as improve quality of care, cost-effectiveness, and create research opportunities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Quality Indicators. Patient Safety Indicators Download. Vol http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/psi_download.htm 2007. Accessed June 14, 2010.
American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm. Accessed June 14, 2010.
Bini SA, Fithian DC, Paxton LW, Khatod MX, Inacio MC, Namba RS. Does discharge disposition after primary total joint arthroplasty affect readmission rates? J Arthroplasty. Jan 2010;25:114–117.
Gioe TJ, Kileen KK, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised? Clin OrthopRelat Res. 2004;428:100–110.
Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. Rockville, MD: AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality); April 2007. HHSA29020050035I T01. Publication No 07-EHC001-1.
Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:337–353.
Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov 1997;344:44–60.
Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. Apr 2000;71:111–121.
Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:19–23.
Khatod M, Inacio M, Paxton EW, Bini SA, Namba RS, Burchette RJ, Fithian DC. Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17,080 replacements from 1995 through 2004. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:812–819.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2606–2612.
Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Malchau H, Lau E. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89 Suppl 3:144–151.
Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64:497–506.
Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84 Suppl 2:2–20.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–278; quiz 279–280.
Namba RS, Chen Y, Paxton EW, Slipchenko T, Fithian DC. Outcomes of routine use of antibiotic-loaded cement in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):44–47.
Namba RS, Inacio M. Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2):58–61.
Namba RS, Paxton L, Fithian DC, Stone ML. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):46–50.
Paxton E, Inacio M, Slipchenko T, Fithian D. The Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry. The Permanente Journal. 2008;12:12–16. Available at: www.kp.org/permanentejournal. Accessed June 14, 2010.
Acknowledgments
We thank all of our orthopaedic surgeons and the registry staff who contribute to the success of the TJRR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Appendices
Appendix 1. Total Joint Replacement Registry forms (hip and knee operative, preoperative, postoperative)
Appendix 2. Total Joint Replacement Registry Smartforms examples (preoperative and postoperative)
About this article
Cite this article
Paxton, E.W., Inacio, M.C.S., Khatod, M. et al. Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: Aligning Operations With Information Technology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2646–2663 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9