Abstract
Musculoskeletal procedures often show wide variation in rates across geographic areas, which begs the question, “Which rate is right?” Clearly, there is no simple answer to this question. We summarize a conceptual framework for thinking about how to approach this question for different types of interventions. One guiding principle is the “right rate” is usually the one that results from the choices of a fully informed and empowered patient population. For truly effective care without substantial tradeoffs, the right rate may approach 100%. The rate of operative treatment of hip fracture, for example, approaches the underlying incidence of disease; however, the rate of some forms of effective care, like osteoporosis evaluation and treatment after a fragility fracture, is often quite low and undoubtedly reflects underuse. The recommended approach to underuse is to improve the reliability and accountability of the delivery system. Many other musculoskeletal interventions fall into the category of “preference-sensitive care.” These interventions involve important tradeoffs between risks and benefits. Variations in these procedure rates may represent insufficient focus on patient values and preferences, relying instead on the enthusiasm of the physician for treatment alternatives. The recommended approach in this setting is the use of decision aids and other approaches to informed choice.
Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baicker K, Chandra A, Skinner JS. Geographic variation in health care and the problem of measuring racial disparities. Perspect Biol Med. 2005;48(1 Suppl):S42–S53.
Bruyere O, Brandi ML, Burlet N, Harvey N, Lyritis G, Minne H, Boonen S, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Akesson K. Post-fracture management of patients with hip fracture: a perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2008;24:2841–2851.
Dartmouth Medical School, Weinstein JN. Birkmeyer JD, ed. Dartmouth Atlas of Musculoskeletal Health Care. Chicago, IL: AHA Press; 2000.
Escalante A, Barrett J, del Rincon I, Cornell JE, Phillips CB, Katz JN. Disparity in total hip replacement affecting Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries. Med Care. 2002;40:451–460.
Fanuele JC, Lurie JD, Zhou W, Koval KJ, Weinstein JN. Variations in hip fracture treatment: are black and white patients treated equally? Am J Orthop. 2009;38:E13–E17.
Fisher ES, Staiger DO, Bynum JP, Gottlieb DJ. Creating accountable care organizations: the extended hospital medical staff. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:w44–w57.
Fisher ES, Wennberg JE, Stukel TA, Sharp SM. Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:989–995.
Gittelsohn AM, Halpern J, Sanchez RL. Income, race, and surgery in Maryland. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1435–1441.
Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Wilkins A, Badley EM. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients’ preferences. Med Care. 2001;39:206–216.
Hawker GA, Wright JG, Glazier RH, Coyte PC, Harvey B, Williams JI, Badley EM. The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:3331–3339.
Insitute of Medicine, ed. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
Katz J. Preferences, disparities, and the authenticity of patient choices. J Rheumatology. 2003;30(S68):12–14.
Katz JN. Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA. 2001;286:1506–1509.
Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W, Sparks MB, Cantu RV, Sporer SM, Weinstein J. Ankle fractures in the elderly: what you get depends on where you live and who you see. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:635–639.
Lurie J, Berven S, Gibson J, Tosteson TD, Tosteson ANA, Hu SS, Weinstein J. Patient preferences and expectations for care: determinants in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine. 2008;33:2663–2668.
Lurie J, Tosteson ANA, Zhou W, Weinstein J. Patterns of Vertebroplasty Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries. International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine. Hong Kong, PRC; 2007.
Lurie JD, Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN. Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery. Spine. 2003;28:616–620.
Lüthje P, Nurmi-Lüthje I, Kaukonen JP, Kuurne S, Naboulsi H, Kataja M. Undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 Aug 13. [Epub ahead of print].
Metje CJ, Leslie WD, Manness L-J, Yogandran M, Yuen CK, Kvern B. Postfracture care for older women: gaps between optimal care and actual care. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:1270–1276.
Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein JN, Ciol MA, Kreuter W, Howe JF. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine. 2001;26:206–211;discussion 212.
Rabenda V, Vanoverloop J, Fabri V, Mertens R, Sumkay F, Vannecke C, Deswaef A, Verpooten GA, Reginster JY. Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2142–2148.
Shortell SM, Casalino LP. Health care reform requires accountable care systems. JAMA. 2008;300:95–97.
Sirovich BE, Gottlieb DJ, Welch HG, Fisher ES. Regional variations in health care intensity and physician perceptions of quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:641–649.
Skinner J, Weinstein JN, Sporer SM, Wennberg JE. Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1350–1359.
Weinstein JN, Bronner KK, Morgan TS, Wennberg JE. Trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:VAR81-9.
Weinstein JN, Clay K, Morgan TS. Informed patient choice: patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:726–730.
Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine. 2006;31:2707–2714.
Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;Suppl Web Exclusives:W96-114.
Wright JG, Hawker GA, Bombardier C, Croxford R, Dittus RS, Freund DA, Coyte PC. Physician enthusiasm as an explanation for area variation in the utilization of knee replacement surgery. Med Care. 1999;37:946–956.
Acknowledgments
We thank Tamara Morgan for her help with preparing this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Drs. Lurie and Weinstein have both served as consultants for the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making (FIMDM).
About this article
Cite this article
Lurie, J.D., Bell, J.E. & Weinstein, J. What Rate of Utilization is Appropriate in Musculoskeletal Care?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 2506–2511 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0889-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0889-4