Skip to main content
Log in

Leg Lengthening With a Motorized Nail in Adolescents

An Alternative to External Fixators?

  • Original Article
  • Pediatrics
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

Leg lengthening by external fixation is associated with various difficulties. We evaluated eight adolescent patients who underwent leg lengthening with a motorized intramedullary lengthening device. We asked whether this method could reduce the time of hospitalization and rehabilitation and whether the incidence of complications commonly associated with external fixators could be reduced. We compared our preliminary results with those from other reports, with a focus on leg length achieved, time of rehabilitation, and rate of complications. The average leg-length discrepancy was 3.8 cm (range, 3–5 cm). The average lengthening distance was 3.8 cm (range, 2.9–4.7 cm). In six patients, leg lengthening was combined with successful correction of the mechanical axis alignment. The consolidation index averaged 26 days/cm (range, 19–41 days/cm). The average hospital stay was 9.6 days. No bone or soft tissue infections were observed. In comparison to other studies (1.0–2.8 complications/patient), our results suggest that the difficulties commonly associated with external fixators can be reduced with this method. It also allows good angular correction in patients with mechanical axis deviation. These features combined with a short time of hospitalization and rehabilitation make it a promising procedure for limb lengthening.

Level of Evidence: Level IV Therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2A–K

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldegheri R, Dall’Oca C. Limb lengthening in short stature patients. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10:238–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumann F, Harms J. [The extension nail: a new method for lengthening of the femur and tibia (author’s transl).] Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1977;90:139–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgart R, Betz A, Schweiberer L. A fully implantable motorized intramedullary nail for limb lengthening and bone transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;343:135–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgart R, Bürklein D, Hinterwimmer S, Thaller P, Mutschler W. The management of leg-length discrepancy in Ollier’s disease with a fully implantable lengthening nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1000–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgart R, Krammer M, Winkler A, Hinterwimmer S, Muensterer O, Mutschler W. Reduction of high dislocation of the hip using a distraction nail before arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:565–567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumgart R, Thaller P, Hinterwimmer S, Krammer M, Hierl T, Mutschler W. A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)–new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb survey. In: Leung KS, Taglang G, Schnettler R, eds. Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails. 3rd ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin; 2006:189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Betz A, Baumgart R, Schweiberer L. [First fully implantable intramedullary system for callus distraction: intramedullary nail with programmable drive for leg lengthening and segment displacement: principles and initial clinical results.] Chirurg. 1990;61:605–609.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bost FC, Larsen LJ. Experiences with lengthening of the femur over an intramedullary rod. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38:567–584.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole JD, Justin D, Kasparis T, DeVlught D, Knobloch C. The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury. 2001;32(suppl 4):SD129–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahl MT, Gulli B, Berg T. Complications of limb lengthening: a learning curve. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:10–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danziger MB, Kumar A, DeWeese J. Fractures after femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov method. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:220–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Donnan LT, Saleh M, Rigby AS. Acute correction of lower limb deformity and simultaneous lengthening with a monolateral fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:254–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Faber FW, Keessen W, van Roermund PM. Complications of leg lengthening: 46 procedures in 28 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:327–332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. García-Cimbrelo E, Curto de la Mano A, García-Rey E, Cordero J, Marti-Ciruelos R. The intramedullary elongation nail for femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:971–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gordon JE, Goldfarb CA, Luhmann SJ, Lyons D, Schoenecker PL. Femoral lengthening over a humeral intramedullary nail in preadolescent children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:930–937.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Götz J, Schellmann WD. [Continuous lengthening of the femur with intramedullary stabilisation (author’s transl).] Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1975;82:305–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guichet JM. [Leg lengthening and correction of deformity using the femoral Albizzia nail.] Orthopade. 1999;28:1066–1077.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guichet JM, Casar RS. Mechanical characterization of a totally intramedullary gradual elongation nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guichet JM, Deromedis B, Donnan LT, Peretti G, Lascombes P, Bado F. Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:838–848.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hankemeier S, Gösling T, Pape HC, Wiebking U, Krettek C. Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD). Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17:79–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hankemeier S, Pape HC, Gosling T, Hufner T, Richter M, Krettek C. Improved comfort in lower limb lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: principles and preliminary clinical experiences. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:129–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Herzenberg JE, Scheufele LL, Paley D, Bechtel R, Tepper S. Knee range of motion in isolated femoral lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:49–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:263–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:8–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Kilicoglu O, Burc H, Cakmak M. Complications encountered during lengthening over an intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2406–2411.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristiansen LP, Steen H. Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail, using the Ilizarov external fixator: major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:271–274.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Leidinger B, Winkelmann W, Roedl R. [Limb lengthening with a fully implantable mechanical distraction intramedullary nail.] Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006;144:419–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Noonan KJ, Leyes M, Forriol F, Cañadell J. Distraction osteogenesis of the lower extremity with use of monolateral external fixation: a study of two hundred and sixty-one femora and tibiae. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:793–806.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oedekoven G, Jansen D, Raschke M, Claudi BF. [The monorail system bone segment transport over unreamed interlocking nails.] Chirurg. 1996;67:1069–1079.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail: a matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1464–1480.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramaker RR, Lagro SW, van Roermund PM, Sinnema G. The psychological and social functioning of 14 children and 12 adolescents after Ilizarov leg lengthening. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:55–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Raschke MJ, Mann JW, Oedekoven G, Claudi BF. Segmental transport after unreamed intramedullary nailing: preliminary report of a “Monorail” system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:233–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saraph V, Roposch A, Zwick EB, Linhart WE. Tibial lengthening over nails in children using modified Ender nails: preliminary results of a new treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2004;13:383–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Simpson AH, Cole AS, Kenwright J. Leg lengthening over an intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:1041–1045.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Simpson AH, Kenwright J. Fracture after distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:659–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh S, Lahiri A, Iqbal M. The result of limb lengthening by callus distraction using an extending intramedullary nail (Fitbone) in non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:938–942.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tjernström B, Olerud S, Rehnberg L. Limb lengthening by callus distraction: complications in 53 cases operated 1980–1991. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:447–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Witt AN, Jäger M. [Results of animal experiments with an implantable femur distractor for operative leg lengthening (author’s transl).] Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1977;88:273–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Witt AN, Jäger M, Bruns H, Küsswetter W. [An implantable femur distractor for operative leg lengthening (author’s transl).] Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1978;92:291–296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Young N, Bell DF, Anthony A. Pediatric pain patterns during Ilizarov treatment of limb length discrepancy and angular deformity. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:352–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas H. Krieg MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Krieg, A.H., Speth, B.M. & Foster, B.K. Leg Lengthening With a Motorized Nail in Adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 189–197 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0040-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0040-3

Keywords

Navigation