Abstract
Adversarial relations between science and religion have recurred throughout Western History. Archaeologists figure prominently in a recent incarnation of this debate as members of a hegemonic scientific elite. Postmodern debates situate disagreements in cosmological differences between innocent, traditional, native peoples and insensitive, career-mad, colonialist scientists. This simplistic dichotomy patronizes both First Peoples and archaeologists, pitting two economically marginal groups in a political struggle that neither can win. Although a few scholars have discussed the tyrannical nature of anthropological models of tradition and culture, little consideration has been given to the fact that archaeology as a scientific discipline is drastically under-funded, with little research support and few jobs. Reconsideration of which political and economic groups actually benefit from the dramatization of a dichotomy between traditional and academic perspectives indicates some interesting patterns. The search for common ground is shown to have ethical implications for both the futures of First Peoples and the future of archaeology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yellen, John (1998) NSF archaeology program director, personal communication.
Zeder, M. (1998) The American Archaeologist, A Profile. Altmaira Press, Walnut Creek.
Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, Free Press, New York.
Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A. (eds.) (1993) Archaeological Theory: Who sets the Agenda?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wylie, A. (1993) A proliferation of New Archaeologies: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism, In: eds. Yoffee, Norman & Sherratt, Andrew, Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, pp. 20–26, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tilley, Christopher (1989) Excavation as Theater. Antiquity 63(2): 275–280.
Shanks, Michael & Tilley, Christopher (1987) Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Columbia University Press, New York.
Hodder, Ian (1991) Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity 56(1): 7–18.
Forsman, Leonard (1997) Straddling the current: A view from the bridge over clear salt water, In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. & Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 105–111.
Downer, Alan S. (1997) Archaeologists-Native American Relations. In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. & Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 23–34.
White Deer, Gary (1997) Return Of The Sacred: Spirituality And The Scientific Imperative. In: eds., Swidler, N. Dongoske, K. Anyon, R, & Downer, A., Native American and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 37–43.
Wolf, E. (1982) Europe and the People Without History, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974) The Modern World System, Academic Press, New York.
Layton, Robert (1989) Who Needs the Past? Indigenous Values and Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York.
Swidler, Nina & Cohen, Janet (1997) Issues in Intertribal Consultation. In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. and Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 197–206.
Echo-Hawk, Roger (1997) Forging a New Ancient History for Native America. In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. and Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 88–102.
Tsosic, Rebecca (1997) Indigenous Rights and Archaeology. In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. & Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 64–76.
Williams, N.M. and Mununggur, D. (1989) Understanding Yolngu Signs Of The Past. In: ed., Layton, R., Who Needs the Past? Indigenous Values and Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 70–83.
Zimmerman, L. (1997) Remythologyzing The Relationship Between Indians And Archaeologists. In: eds., Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. & Downer, A., Native American and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 44–56.
Farnham, Christie (1987) The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Barber, Elizabeth Wayland (1994) Women’s Work: The First 20,000 Years: Women, Cloth, and Society in Early Times. Norton, New York.
Haraway, Donna. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, Routledge, New York.
Lloyd, Lisa (1995) Feminism as a Method: What Scientists get that Philosophers Don’t. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 189–220.
Ferguson, T.J., Watkins, J. & Pullar, G.L. (1997) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Commentary and Personal Perspectives. In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. & Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 237–252.
Jackson, Loretta & Stevens, Robert H. (“Hank”) (1997) Hualapai Tradition, Religion, and the Role of Cultural Resource Management. In: eds. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. & Downer, A., Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 135–142.
Conkey, Margaret W. & Gero, Joan M. (1997) Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 411–37.
Nelson, Sarah (1997) The Archaeology of Gender, Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Pyburn, K. Anne (1998) Consuming the Maya, Dialectical Anthropology 23: 111–129.
Pyburn, K. Anne (in press) Ungendering Civilization: Untangling the Sexist Legacy of Cultural Evolutionism. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek.
Wylie, A. (1996) The Constitution of Archaeological Evidence: Gender Politics and Science. In: eds. Galison, P. & Stump, D., The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 311–343.
Wylie, A. (1997) Good Science, Bad Science, or Science as Usual? Feminist Critiques of Science. In: ed. Hager, L., Women in Human Evolution, Routledge, New York and London, pp. 29–55.
Salmon, Merrilee (1997) Ethical Considerations in Anthropology and Archaeology, or Relativism and Justice for All, Journal of Anthropological Research 53: 47–63.
Jeske, Robert (1994) Residual Effects of Grave Descerations: The GE Mounds Case. Public Archaeology Review 2 (2): 8–13.
Wilk, R.R. (1999) Whose Forest? Whose Land? Whose Ruins? Ethics and Conservation, Science and Engineering Ethics 5: 367–374.
Fox, Richard Allan, Jr., and Wood, W. Raymond (1997) Archaeology, History, and Custer’s Last Battle: The Little Big Horn Reexamined. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
Malinowski, B. (1922) Argonauts Of The Western Pacific: An Account Of Native Enterprise And Adventure In The Archipelagoes Of Melanesian New Guinea, Routledge & Sons Ltd., London.
Levy-Bruhl, Lucien (1985) How Natives Think (authorized translation by Lilian A. Clare; with a new introduction, “Lucien Levy-Bruhl and the concept of cognitive relativity” by C. Scott Littleton.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Warren, Kay B. (1996) Reading History as Resistance: Maya Public Intellectuals in Guatemala. In: Maya Cultural Activism in Guatemala, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 89–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pyburn, K.A. Native American religion versus archaeological science: A pernicious dichotomy revisited. SCI ENG ETHICS 5, 355–366 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0026-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0026-5