Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 18))

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

We take Grosseteste’s scientific practices and works, together with their intellectual and theological milieu, as a ‘distant mirror’ in which to calibrate the anxious and fraught debates around the relation of science and religion today. Urging that we are missing a cultural teleological and ethical narrative in support of science, we look at the deeper theological and philosophical resources that Grosseteste drew on, and identify five that, after suitable transformation, can be applied in our time to rethink what science is for, and how we might guide its application: (1) the disruption of damaging myths, (2) the long history of science, (3) a cultural narrative for science, (4) a unified vision and (5) a relational and incarnational metaphysics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aristotle, De sensu et sensatu available in translation at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/sense.html

  2. 2.

    Grosseteste’s access to and knowledge of this seminal work of Bede is discussed in (Southern 1986).

  3. 3.

    See the chapter on the Hexaemeron by Giles Gasper in part IV this volume for Grosseteste’s views on the all-encompassing canvas of Scripture.

  4. 4.

    We recall Paul’s categories in 1 Cor. 1: 7.

  5. 5.

    This may be an abbreviation of a five-step ‘ladder of intelligence’ detailed by Isaac of Stella in his Sermon 4 on the Feast of All Saints (1977): ‘For the soul too, while on pilgrimage in the world of its body, there are five steps towards wisdom: sense-perception, imagination, reason, intelligence and understanding.’

  6. 6.

    Trans. Sigbjørn Sønnesyn (personal communication); Aristotle’s Post. An. II.19 is also in the background here, where the emergence of general understanding from particulars of sense-perception is described: ‘It is like a rout in battle stopped by first one man making a stand and then another, until the original formation has been restored’.

  7. 7.

    Remarkably, the visual perception of depth in materials beneath a translucent surface, is currently an active topic in vision research, see e.g. (Motoyoshi 2010) and the chapter by Hannah Smithson (Part I this volume).

  8. 8.

    This special sort of ‘seeing’ which is Wisdom- and also the great metaphor for scientific insight- is also picked up strongly by Oxford theologian and philosopher Paul Fiddes (2014).

  9. 9.

    See for example (Bowen and Viltberg 2009).

  10. 10.

    Lucretius De rerum natura.

References

  • Ball, R. M. (2012). Robert Grosseteste on the Psalms. In J. P. Cunningham (Ed.), Robert Grosseteste: His thought and its impact (pp. 79–108). Toronto, ON: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A. C., & Viltberg, C. (Eds.). (2009). New perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, R. G., McLeish, T. C. B., Tanner, B. K., Smithson, H. E., Lewis, N., & Gasper, G. (2014). A medieval multiverse? Mathematical modelling of the Thirteenth Century Universe of Robert Grosseteste. Royal Society of London Proceedings, Series A470, 20140025. doi:10.1098/rsp.2014.0025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clines, D. J. A. (2006). World biblical commentary. London: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. C. (1953). Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science 1100-1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., Macnaghten, P., & Kearnes, M. (2009). Reconfiguring responsibility: Deepening debate on nanotechnology. Durham: Durham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (2007). Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phenomenon. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkova-Bruun, G., Gasper, G. E. M., Huxtable, M., McLeish, T. C. B., Panti, C., & Smithson, H. (2013). Dimensions of colour: Robert Grosseteste’s De Colore; Edition, translation and interdisciplinary analysis. Toronto, ON: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1906–13). Etudes sur Leonard de Vinci (3 vols). Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPuy, J.-P. (2010). The narratology of lay ethics. Nanoethics, 4, 153–170. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0097-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1905). Annalen der Physik, 17(6), 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder, H. (1904). Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Studieren im Franziskanerorden. Freiburg: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddes, P. (2014). Seeing the world and knowing god. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A., & Varghese, R. A. (2007). There is a god: How the World’s most notorious atheist changed his mind. New York: Harper One.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosseteste, R. (1996). On the six days of creation (C. F. J. Martin, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosseteste, R. (2011). La luce: Introduzione, Testo Latino, Traduzione E Commento (C. Panti, Ed.). Pisa: Edizioni Plus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosseteste, R. (2012). On the cessation of the law (S. M. Hilderbrand, Trans.). Washington, DC: Catholic University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (2009). The fall of man and the foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac of Stella. (1977). Sermon 4 on the feast of all saints (B. McGinn, Trans.). Minnesota, MN: Cistercian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, C., & Wallis, F. (2010). Bede: On the nature of things and on times. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, H. O. (1990). Life expectancy. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2008). ‘It’s development, stupid!’ or: How to modernize modernization. In J. Procter (Ed.), Postenvironmentalism (pp. 17–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, E. A. (2003). Robert Grosseteste’s Anglo-Norman treatise on the loss and restoration of creation, commonly known as Le Château d’amour. In M. O’Carrol (Ed.), Robert Grosseteste and the beginnings of a British tradition (pp. 151–179). Rome: Istituto Storico dei Cappucini.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, J. (2000). Robert Grosseteste. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, T. (2014). Faith and wisdom in science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motoyoshi, I. (2010). Highlight- shading relationship as a cue for the perception of translucent and transparent materials. Journal of Vision, 10(9), 6. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, R. (2010). Galileo goes to jail and other myths about science and religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panti, C. (2012). Scienza E Teologia Agli Esordi Della Scuola Dei Minori Oxford: Roberto Grossatesta, Adamo Marsh E Adamo Di Exeter. In E. Menestò (Ed.), I Francescani E Le Scienze Atti Del 39 Convegno Internazionale Assisi, 6–8 Ottobre 2011 (pp. 311–351). Perugia: CISAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1934). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Principe, L. (2011). The scientific revolution: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. (Ed.). (1981). Robertus Grosseteste, Commentarius in Posteriorum Analyticorum Libros. Unione Accademica Nazionale Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi, Testi e Studi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, C. (1980). Cosmos: The story of cosmic evolution, science and civilisation. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, H. E., et al. (2014). Journal of the Optical Society of America, 31, A341–A349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southern, R. (1986). The growth of an English mind in medieval Europe. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuerger, S. M., Maloney, L. T., & Krauskopf, J. (1995). Vision research, 35, 827–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom McLeish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McLeish, T. (2016). Medieval Lessons for the Modern Science/Religion Debate. In: Cunningham, J.P., Hocknull, M. (eds) Robert Grosseteste and the pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33468-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33468-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33466-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33468-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics