Abstract
We take Grosseteste’s scientific practices and works, together with their intellectual and theological milieu, as a ‘distant mirror’ in which to calibrate the anxious and fraught debates around the relation of science and religion today. Urging that we are missing a cultural teleological and ethical narrative in support of science, we look at the deeper theological and philosophical resources that Grosseteste drew on, and identify five that, after suitable transformation, can be applied in our time to rethink what science is for, and how we might guide its application: (1) the disruption of damaging myths, (2) the long history of science, (3) a cultural narrative for science, (4) a unified vision and (5) a relational and incarnational metaphysics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Aristotle, De sensu et sensatu available in translation at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/sense.html
- 2.
Grosseteste’s access to and knowledge of this seminal work of Bede is discussed in (Southern 1986).
- 3.
See the chapter on the Hexaemeron by Giles Gasper in part IV this volume for Grosseteste’s views on the all-encompassing canvas of Scripture.
- 4.
We recall Paul’s categories in 1 Cor. 1: 7.
- 5.
This may be an abbreviation of a five-step ‘ladder of intelligence’ detailed by Isaac of Stella in his Sermon 4 on the Feast of All Saints (1977): ‘For the soul too, while on pilgrimage in the world of its body, there are five steps towards wisdom: sense-perception, imagination, reason, intelligence and understanding.’
- 6.
Trans. Sigbjørn Sønnesyn (personal communication); Aristotle’s Post. An. II.19 is also in the background here, where the emergence of general understanding from particulars of sense-perception is described: ‘It is like a rout in battle stopped by first one man making a stand and then another, until the original formation has been restored’.
- 7.
Remarkably, the visual perception of depth in materials beneath a translucent surface, is currently an active topic in vision research, see e.g. (Motoyoshi 2010) and the chapter by Hannah Smithson (Part I this volume).
- 8.
This special sort of ‘seeing’ which is Wisdom- and also the great metaphor for scientific insight- is also picked up strongly by Oxford theologian and philosopher Paul Fiddes (2014).
- 9.
See for example (Bowen and Viltberg 2009).
- 10.
Lucretius De rerum natura.
References
Ball, R. M. (2012). Robert Grosseteste on the Psalms. In J. P. Cunningham (Ed.), Robert Grosseteste: His thought and its impact (pp. 79–108). Toronto, ON: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Bowen, A. C., & Viltberg, C. (Eds.). (2009). New perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill.
Bower, R. G., McLeish, T. C. B., Tanner, B. K., Smithson, H. E., Lewis, N., & Gasper, G. (2014). A medieval multiverse? Mathematical modelling of the Thirteenth Century Universe of Robert Grosseteste. Royal Society of London Proceedings, Series A470, 20140025. doi:10.1098/rsp.2014.0025.
Clines, D. J. A. (2006). World biblical commentary. London: Thomas Nelson.
Crombie, A. C. (1953). Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science 1100-1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, S., Macnaghten, P., & Kearnes, M. (2009). Reconfiguring responsibility: Deepening debate on nanotechnology. Durham: Durham University.
Dennett, D. (2007). Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phenomenon. London: Penguin.
Dinkova-Bruun, G., Gasper, G. E. M., Huxtable, M., McLeish, T. C. B., Panti, C., & Smithson, H. (2013). Dimensions of colour: Robert Grosseteste’s De Colore; Edition, translation and interdisciplinary analysis. Toronto, ON: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Duhem, P. (1906–13). Etudes sur Leonard de Vinci (3 vols). Paris: Hermann.
DuPuy, J.-P. (2010). The narratology of lay ethics. Nanoethics, 4, 153–170. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0097-4.
Einstein, A. (1905). Annalen der Physik, 17(6), 132–148.
Felder, H. (1904). Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Studieren im Franziskanerorden. Freiburg: Herder.
Fiddes, P. (2014). Seeing the world and knowing god. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flew, A., & Varghese, R. A. (2007). There is a god: How the World’s most notorious atheist changed his mind. New York: Harper One.
Grosseteste, R. (1996). On the six days of creation (C. F. J. Martin, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grosseteste, R. (2011). La luce: Introduzione, Testo Latino, Traduzione E Commento (C. Panti, Ed.). Pisa: Edizioni Plus.
Grosseteste, R. (2012). On the cessation of the law (S. M. Hilderbrand, Trans.). Washington, DC: Catholic University Press.
Harrison, P. (2009). The fall of man and the foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Isaac of Stella. (1977). Sermon 4 on the feast of all saints (B. McGinn, Trans.). Minnesota, MN: Cistercian Press.
Kendall, C., & Wallis, F. (2010). Bede: On the nature of things and on times. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lancaster, H. O. (1990). Life expectancy. New York: Springer.
Latour, B. (2008). ‘It’s development, stupid!’ or: How to modernize modernization. In J. Procter (Ed.), Postenvironmentalism (pp. 17–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mackie, E. A. (2003). Robert Grosseteste’s Anglo-Norman treatise on the loss and restoration of creation, commonly known as Le Château d’amour. In M. O’Carrol (Ed.), Robert Grosseteste and the beginnings of a British tradition (pp. 151–179). Rome: Istituto Storico dei Cappucini.
McEvoy, J. (2000). Robert Grosseteste. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLeish, T. (2014). Faith and wisdom in science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Motoyoshi, I. (2010). Highlight- shading relationship as a cue for the perception of translucent and transparent materials. Journal of Vision, 10(9), 6. 1–11.
Numbers, R. (2010). Galileo goes to jail and other myths about science and religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Panti, C. (2012). Scienza E Teologia Agli Esordi Della Scuola Dei Minori Oxford: Roberto Grossatesta, Adamo Marsh E Adamo Di Exeter. In E. Menestò (Ed.), I Francescani E Le Scienze Atti Del 39 Convegno Internazionale Assisi, 6–8 Ottobre 2011 (pp. 311–351). Perugia: CISAM.
Popper, K. (1934). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Principe, L. (2011). The scientific revolution: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rossi, P. (Ed.). (1981). Robertus Grosseteste, Commentarius in Posteriorum Analyticorum Libros. Unione Accademica Nazionale Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi, Testi e Studi.
Sagan, C. (1980). Cosmos: The story of cosmic evolution, science and civilisation. London: Random House.
Smithson, H. E., et al. (2014). Journal of the Optical Society of America, 31, A341–A349.
Southern, R. (1986). The growth of an English mind in medieval Europe. Oxford: Clarendon.
Wuerger, S. M., Maloney, L. T., & Krauskopf, J. (1995). Vision research, 35, 827–835.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLeish, T. (2016). Medieval Lessons for the Modern Science/Religion Debate. In: Cunningham, J.P., Hocknull, M. (eds) Robert Grosseteste and the pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle Ages. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33468-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33468-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33466-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33468-4
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)