Skip to main content
Log in

Inotropic Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure Patients

  • Heart Failure
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Positive inotropic agents play an important role in the management of acute decompensated heart failure (HF) patients with reduced cardiac output and poor end-organ perfusion. However, despite their acute hemodynamic benefits, the role of inotropes in the management of chronic advanced HF remains limited. Although digoxin has demonstrated the ability to improve symptoms in HF patients, numerous small, mostly nonrandomized studies have shown that patients with advanced HF improve symptomatically when administered continuous or intermittent intravenous β-agonists or phosphodiesterase inhibitors. However, this improvement occurs at the expense of an increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and mortality. Similarly, several oral inotropes have been developed and studied in larger randomized clinical trials. The PROMISE study found that oral milrinone is associated with increased mortality, whereas the ESSENTIAL study showed that oral enoximone does not result in any significant improvement in symptoms, exercise capacity, or survival. The calcium-sensitizing inotrope levosimendan has shown some promise in the management of acute HF patients, but the PERSIST trial showed no improvement in survival or hospitalization rates with chronic oral therapy. This agent is still under investigation and is not available in the United States. Istaroxime, an inotrope with lusitropic properties, is also being investigated for its potential use in advanced HF patients. The current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, and Heart Failure Society of America guidelines indicate that, other than digoxin, inotropic agents should be reserved for patients presenting with acute decompensated HF and low-output states and reduced end-organ perfusion, who typically are admitted to an intensive care unit. These agents also are of benefit in advanced HF patients as a bridge to transplantation to optimize end-organ function and may be used in the outpatient setting, usually in patients with an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator. Finally, inotropes should be used to palliate symptoms in end-stage HF patients who have severe symptoms and are not candidates for heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Bristow RB, Linas S, Port JD: Drugs in the treatment of heart failure. In Braunwald’s Heart Disease, edn 7th. By Libby P, Bonow RO, Zipes DP, et al. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:569–601.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dies F, Krell MJ, Whitlow P, et al.: Intermittent dobutamine in ambulatory outpatients with chronic cardiac failure. Circulation 1986, 74(Suppl II):II-38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DiBianco R, Shabetai R, Kostuk W, et al.: A comparison of oral milrinone, digoxin, and their combination in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 1989, 320:677–683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ, et al.: Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. The PROMISE Study Research Group. N Engl J Med 1991, 325:1468–1475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuffe MS, Califf RM, Adams Jr KF, et al.: Short-term intravenous milrinone for acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 287:1541–1547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorodeski EZ, Chu EC, Reese JR, et al.: Prognosis on chronic dobutamine or milrinone infusions for stage D heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2009, 2:320–324. This analysis shows that patients with advanced HF who are not transplant candidates and are treated with palliative inotropes have a very poor prognosis. Their outcomes were similar regardless of whether they were treated with milrinone or dobutamine.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uretsky BF, Young JB, Shahidi FE, et al.: Randomized study assessing the effect of digoxin withdrawal in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure: results of the PROVED trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993, 22:955–962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman AM, Oren RM, Abraham WT, et al.: Low-dose oral enoximone enhances the ability to wean patients with ultra-advanced heart failure from intravenous inotropic support: results of the oral enoximone in intravenous inotrope-dependent subjects trial. Am Heart J 2007, 154:861–869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Metra M, Eichhorn E, Abraham WT, et al.: Effects of low-dose oral enoximone administration on mortality, morbidity, and exercise capacity in patients with advanced heart failure: the randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group ESSENTIAL trials. Eur Heart J 2009, 30:3015–3026. The ESSENTIAL trial randomly assigned patients with advanced HF to receive oral enoximone or placebo. This trial showed that oral enoximone did not reduce the primary outcome of all-cause death or hospitalization.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kivikko M, Lehtonen L, Colucci WS, et al.: Sustained hemodynamic effects of intravenous levosimendan. Circulation 2003, 107:81–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nieminen MS, Cleland JGF, Eha J, et al.: Oral levosimendan in patients with severe chronic heart failure—the PERSIST study. Eur J Heart Fail 2008, 10:1245–1254. The PERSIST trial showed that oral levosimendan did not provide any significant reduction in the primary outcome of death, hospitalization or symptom assessment after 6 months of therapy. There was significant improvement in the NT-proBNP of patients treated with levosimendan, which makes this drug a possible therapeutic option for symptom reduction if future trials support this finding.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kubo SH, Gollub S, Bourge R, et al.: Beneficial effects of pimobendan on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Results of a multicenter trial. The Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group. Circulation 1992, 85:942–949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lubsen J, Just H, Hjalmarsson AC, et al.: Effect of pimobendan on exercise capacity in patients with heart failure: main results from the Pimobendan in Congestive Heart Failure (PICO) trial. Heart 1996, 76:223–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacIver J, Rao V, Delgado DH, et al.: Choices: a study of preferences for end-of-life treatments in patients with advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008, 27:1002–1007. This study examined patient preferences regarding end-of-life care in patients with advanced HF. These patients preferred improved quality of life at the expense of reduced survival, suggesting that treating them with palliative inotropes and giving them more time to spend at home and with family members are of significant importance.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Packer M, Gheorghiade M, Young JB, et al.: Withdrawal of digoxin from patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The Digitalis Investigation Group: The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 1997, 336:525–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed A, Rich MW, Love TE, et al.: Digoxin and reduction in mortality and hospitalization in heart failure: a comprehensive post hoc analysis of the DIG trial. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:178–186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leier CV, Webel J, Bush CA: The cardiovascular effects of the continuous infusion of dobutamine in patients with severe cardiac failure. Circulation 1977, 56:468–472.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Binkley PF, Murray KD, Watson KM, et al.: Dobutamine increases cardiac output of the total artificial heart. Implications for vascular contribution of inotropic agents to augmented ventricular function. Circulation 1991, 84:1210–1215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliva F, Latini R, Politi A, et al.: Intermittent 6-month low-dose dobutamine infusion in severe heart failure: DICE Multicenter Trial. Am Heart J 1999, 138:247–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thackraya S, Easthaughb J, Freemantle N, et al.: The effectiveness and relative effectiveness of intravenous inotropic drugs acting through the adrenergic pathway in patients with heart failure—a meta-regression analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2002, 4:515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Amsallem E, Kasparian C, Haddour G, et al.: Phosphodiesterase III inhibitors for heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, CD002230.

  23. Shakar SF, Abraham WT, Gilbert EM, et al.: Combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy for treatment of refractory class IV heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 31:1336–1340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Slawsky MT, Colucci WS, Gottlieb SS, et al.: Acute hemodynamic and clinical effects of levosimendan in patients with severe heart failure. Circulation 2000, 102:2222–2227.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Follath F, Cleland JGF, Just H, et al.: Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomized double-blind trial. Lancet 2002, 360:196–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mebazaa A, Nieminen MS, Packer M, et al.: Levosimendan vs. dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure. JAMA 2007, 297:1883–1891.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. The EPOCH Study Group: Effects of pimobendan on adverse cardiac events and physical activities in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure: the Effects of Pimobendan on Chronic Heart Failure Study (EPOCH Study). Circ J 2002, 66:149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghali JK, Smith WB, Torre-Amione G, et al.: A phase 1–2 dose-escalating study evaluating the safety and tolerability of istaroxime and specific effects on electrocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99(Suppl):47A–56A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gheorghiade M, Blair JEA, Filippatos GS, et al.: Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and neurohormonal effects of istaroxime, a novel intravenous inotropic and lusitropic agent. A randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:2276–2285. This randomized study examined the beneficial effects of istaroxime in acute HF patients and showed that treatment with istaroxime improved the hemodynamics of these patients. This study paves the way for future studies of this new drug in the management of advanced HF patients.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall C. Starling MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toma, M., Starling, R.C. Inotropic Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure Patients. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 12, 409–419 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-010-0090-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-010-0090-9

Keywords

Navigation