Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving Approaches to the Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In studies of HFpEF, the reported prevalence of CAD varies widely, which may be the result of inconsistent definitions of CAD, geographic and ethnic differences in CAD burden, varying definitions of HFpEF (including different cutoffs for “preserved ejection fraction”), and differences in study design. Despite these limitations, pooled analysis of prospective HFpEF studies demonstrates that CAD is common in HFpEF, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 50%. Based on available data, patients with signs and symptoms of heart failure who have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and evidence of CAD (HFpEF-CAD) most likely comprise a distinct etiologic and pathophysiologic subset of HFpEF. Therefore, future clinical trials in HFpEF should a priori stratify by CAD or specifically target patients with CAD, strategies that may improve the disappointing track record of therapies tested in HFpEF. The combination of systematic evaluation and management of CAD in HFpEF, along with promising future therapies for HFpEF-CAD, may lead to improved outcomes for this challenging clinical syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Maeder MT, Kaye DM: Heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53(11):905–918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yip GW, Frenneaux M, Sanderson JE: Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: new developments. Heart 2009, 95(19):1549–1552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, et al.: Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med 2006, 355(3):260–269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dauterman KW, Massie BM, Gheorghiade M: Heart failure associated with preserved systolic function: a common and costly clinical entity. Am Heart J 1998, 135(6 Pt 2 Su):S310–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009, 119(3):480–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, et al.: Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2006, 355(3):251–259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bench T, Burkhoff D, O’Connell JB, et al.: Heart failure with normal ejection fraction: consideration of mechanisms other than diastolic dysfunction. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2009, 6(1):57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aurigemma GP, Zile MR, Gaasch WH: Contractile behavior of the left ventricle in diastolic heart failure: with emphasis on regional systolic function. Circulation 2006, 113(2):296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burkhoff D, Maurer MS, Packer M: Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: is it really a disorder of diastolic function? Circulation 2003, 107(5):656–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maurer MS, Spevack D, Burkhoff D, Kronzon I: Diastolic dysfunction: can it be diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44(8):1543–1549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh JK, Hatle L, Tajik AJ, Little WC: Diastolic heart failure can be diagnosed by comprehensive two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(3):500–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruch C, Gradaus R, Gunia S, et al.: Doppler tissue analysis of mitral annular velocities: evidence for systolic abnormalities in patients with diastolic heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16(10):1031–1036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaasch WH, Delorey DE, Kueffer FJ, Zile MR: Distribution of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with ischemic and hypertensive heart disease and chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2009, 104(10):1413–1415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia EH, Perna ER, Farias EF, et al: Reduced systolic performance by tissue Doppler in patients with preserved and abnormal ejection fraction: new insights in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2006, 108(2):181–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikitin NP, de Silva R, Cleland JG: The utility of a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance examination for the evaluation of patients with heart failure. Heart 2004, 90(10):1166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, et al: How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007, 28(20):2539–2550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan YT, Wenzelburger F, Lee E, et al.: The pathophysiology of heart failure with normal ejection fraction: exercise echocardiography reveals complex abnormalities of both systolic and diastolic ventricular function involving torsion, untwist, and longitudinal motion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54(1):36–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vinereanu D, Nicolaides E, Tweddel AC, Fraser AG: “Pure” diastolic dysfunction is associated with long-axis systolic dysfunction. Implications for the diagnosis and classification of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005, 7(5):820–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yip G, Wang M, Zhang Y, et al.: Left ventricular long axis function in diastolic heart failure is reduced in both diastole and systole: time for a redefinition? Heart 2002, 87(2):121–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu CM, Lin H, Yang H, et al.: Progression of systolic abnormalities in patients with “isolated” diastolic heart failure and diastolic dysfunction. Circulation 2002, 105(10):1195–1201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brucks S, Little WC, Chao T, et al.: Contribution of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to heart failure regardless of ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2005, 95(5):603–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heusch G: Diastolic heart failure: a misNOmer. Basic Res Cardiol 2009, 104(5):465–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Keulenaer GW, Brutsaert DL: The heart failure spectrum: time for a phenotype-oriented approach. Circulation 2009, 119(24):3044–3046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah SJ, Gheorghiade M: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: treat now by treating comorbidities. JAMA 2008, 300(4):431–433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Choudhury L, Gheorghiade M, Bonow RO: Coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2002, 89(6):719–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heart Failure Society of America: HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline. J Card Fail 2006, 12(1):e1–e2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al: 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation 2009, 119(14):e391–e479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Somaratne JB, Berry C, McMurray JJ, et al.: The prognostic significance of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a literature-based meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2009, 11(9):855–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Doughty RN, Kaye DM: MAGGIC: Survival in patients with heart failure and preserved versus impaired left ventricular ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Available at http://www.escardio.org/congresses/esc-2009/congress-reports/Pages/711011-711012-doughty-kaye.aspx. Accessed December 2009. This recent patient-level meta-analysis found that HFpEF has an improved but still high mortality compared with systolic HF.

  30. Kitzman DW, Little WC, Brubaker PH, et al.: Pathophysiological characterization of isolated diastolic heart failure in comparison to systolic heart failure. JAMA 2002, 288(17):2144–2150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Doherty TM, Tang W, Detrano RC: Racial differences in the significance of coronary calcium in asymptomatic black and white subjects with coronary risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 34(3):787–794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawakubo M, LaBree L, Xiang M, et al.: Race-ethnic differences in the extent, prevalence, and progression of coronary calcium. Ethn Dis 2005, 15(2):198–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Newman AB, Naydeck BL, Whittle J, et al.: Racial differences in coronary artery calcification in older adults. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002, 22(3):424–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang W, Detrano RC, Brezden OS, et al.: Racial differences in coronary calcium prevalence among high-risk adults. Am J Cardiol 1995, 75(16):1088–1091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Whittle J, Kressin NR, Peterson ED, et al.: Racial differences in prevalence of coronary obstructions among men with positive nuclear imaging studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(10):2034–2041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fonarow GC, Stough WG, Abraham WT, et al.: Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50(8):768–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yancy CW, Lopatin M, Stevenson LW, et al.: Clinical presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved systolic function: a report from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) Database. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(1):76–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA, Rosen B, et al.: Cardiovascular features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus nonfailing hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in the urban Baltimore community: the role of atrial remodeling/dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49(2):198–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lam CS, Roger VL, Rodeheffer RJ, et al.: Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53(13):1119–1126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Massie BM, Carson PE, McMurray JJ, et al: Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2008, 359(23):2456–2467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McMurray JJ, Carson PE, Komajda M, et al.: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics of 4133 patients enrolled in the I-PRESERVE trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2008, 10(2):149–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ahmed A, Rich MW, Fleg JL, et al.: Effects of digoxin on morbidity and mortality in diastolic heart failure: the ancillary digitalis investigation group trial. Circulation 2006, 114(5):397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al.: Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet 2003, 362(9386):777–781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Baicu CF, Zile MR, Aurigemma GP, Gaasch WH: Left ventricular systolic performance, function, and contractility in patients with diastolic heart failure. Circulation 2005, 111(18):2306–2312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kasner M, Westermann D, Steendijk P, et al: Utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of diastolic function in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a comparative Doppler-conductance catheterization study. Circulation 2007, 116(6):637–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nikitin NP, Witte KK, Clark AL, Cleland JG: Color tissue Doppler-derived long-axis left ventricular function in heart failure with preserved global systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2002, 90(10):1174–1177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sanderson JE, Fraser AG: Systolic dysfunction in heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: echo-Doppler measurements. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2006, 49(3):196–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gottdiener JS, Arnold AM, Aurigemma GP, et al.: Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35(6):1628–1637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gottdiener JS, McClelland RL, Marshall R, et al: Outcome of congestive heart failure in elderly persons: influence of left ventricular systolic function. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Intern Med 2002, 137(8):631–639.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Judge KW, Pawitan Y, Caldwell J, et al.: Congestive heart failure symptoms in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: analysis of the CASS registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991, 18(2):377–382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Connor CM, Gattis WA, Shaw L, et al.: Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2000, 86(8):863–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Maurer MS: Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF): embracing complexity. J Card Fail 2009, 15(7):561–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zile MR, Baicu CF, Gaasch WH: Diastolic heart failure—abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. N Engl J Med 2004, 350(19):1953–1959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Borlaug BA, Lam CS, Roger VL, et al.: Contractility and ventricular systolic stiffening in hypertensive heart disease insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54(5):410–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Shah SJ, Schiller NB, Whooley MA: Abnormalities in left ventricular systolic function predict heart failure events despite normal baseline ejection fraction: data from the Heart and Soul Study [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 49(Suppl 1):A122.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Maurer MS, King DL, El-Khoury Rumbarger L, et al.: Left heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: identification of different pathophysiologic mechanisms. J Card Fail 2005, 11(3):177–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McManus DD, Shah SJ, Fabi MR, et al.: Prognostic value of left ventricular end-systolic volume index as a predictor of heart failure hospitalization in stable coronary artery disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22(2):190–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kass DA: Ventricular arterial stiffening: integrating the pathophysiology. Hypertension 2005, 46(1):185–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kliger C, King DL, Maurer MS: A clinical algorithm to differentiate heart failure with a normal ejection fraction by pathophysiologic mechanism. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2006, 15(1):50–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Russell SD, et al.: Impaired chronotropic and vasodilator reserves limit exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2006, 114(20):2138–2147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Phan TT, Nallur Shivu G, Abozguia K, et al.: Impaired Heart Rate Recovery and Chronotropic Incompetence in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2009 Nov 16 (Epub ahead of print). This recent study confirmed earlier findings by Borlaug et al. [60] demonstrating the importance of chronotropic incompetence in the pathogenesis of HFpEF.

  62. Mann T, Brodie BR, Grossman W, McLaurin LP: Effect of angina on the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship. Circulation 1977, 55(5):761–766.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tschope C, Westermann D: Heart failure with normal ejection fraction. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Herz 2009, 34(2):89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sobue T, Yokota M, Iwase M, Ishihara H: Influence of left ventricular hypertrophy on left ventricular function during dynamic exercise in the presence or absence of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, 25(1):91–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Arques S, Ambrosi P, Gelisse R, et al.: Prevalence of angiographic coronary artery disease in patients hospitalized for acute diastolic heart failure without clinical and electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia on admission. Am J Cardiol 2004, 94(1):133–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Arques S, Bonello L, Roux E, et al.: Angiographic coronary artery disease associated with hypertensive heart failure and normal ejection fraction. Insights from a prospective monocenter study. Int J Cardiol 2008, 130(1):75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kim C, Kwok YS, Heagerty P, Redberg R: Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2001, 142(6):934–944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lewis EF, Solomon SD, Jablonski KA, et al.: Predictors of heart failure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a PEACE study. Circ Heart Fail 2009, 2(3):209–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Stevens SM, Farzaneh-Far R, Na B, et al.: Development of an echocardiographic risk-stratification index to predict heart failure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the Heart and Soul study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Holper EM, Blair J, Selzer F, et al: The impact of ejection fraction on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with congestive heart failure: an analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry and Dynamic Registry. Am Heart J 2006, 151(1):69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bonow RO, Bacharach SL, Green MV, et al.: Impaired left ventricular diastolic filling in patients with coronary artery disease: assessment with radionuclide angiography. Circulation 1981, 64(2):315–323.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gorcsan J 3rd, Diana P, Lee J, et al.: Reversible diastolic dysfunction after successful coronary artery bypass surgery. Assessment by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Chest 1994, 106(5):1364–1369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kramer K, Kirkman P, Kitzman D, Little WC: Flash pulmonary edema: association with hypertension and reoccurrence despite coronary revascularization. Am Heart J 2000, 140(3):451–455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Poulsen SH, Jensen SE, Egstrup K: Longitudinal changes and prognostic implications of left ventricular diastolic function in first acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1999, 137(5):910–918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. van Veldhuisen DJ, Cohen-Solal A, Bohm M, et al.: Beta-blockade with nebivolol in elderly heart failure patients with impaired and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: data from SENIORS (Study of Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalization in Seniors With Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53(23):2150–2158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Cleland JG, Tendera M, Adamus J, et al.: The perindopril in elderly people with chronic heart failure (PEP-CHF) study. Eur Heart J 2006, 27(19):2338–2345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Massie BM, Nelson JJ, Lukas MA, et al.: Comparison of outcomes and usefulness of carvedilol across a spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions in patients with heart failure in clinical practice. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99(9):1263–1268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bakris GL, Fonseca V, Katholi RE, et al.: Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 292(18):2227–2236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yip GW, Wang M, Wang T, et al.: The Hong Kong diastolic heart failure study: a randomised controlled trial of diuretics, irbesartan and ramipril on quality of life, exercise capacity, left ventricular global and regional function in heart failure with a normal ejection fraction. Heart 2008, 94(5):573–580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fukuta H, Little WC: Observational studies of statins in heart failure with preserved systolic function. Heart Fail Clin 2008, 4(2):209–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Fukuta H, Sane DC, Brucks S, Little WC: Statin therapy may be associated with lower mortality in patients with diastolic heart failure: a preliminary report. Circulation 2005, 112(3):357–363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Stone PH: Ranolazine: new paradigm for management of myocardial ischemia, myocardial dysfunction, and arrhythmias. Cardiol Clin 2008, 26(4):603–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ades PA: Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2001, 345(12):892–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Sossalla S, Wagner S, Rasenack EC, et al.: Ranolazine improves diastolic dysfunction in isolated myocardium from failing human hearts—role of late sodium current and intracellular ion accumulation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2008, 45(1):32–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hayashida W, van Eyll C, Rousseau MF, Pouleur H: Effects of ranolazine on left ventricular regional diastolic function in patients with ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1994, 8(5):741–747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Schwarz KQ, et al.: Ranolazine shortens repolarization in patients with sustained inward sodium current due to type-3 long-QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008, 19(12):1289–1293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wilcox J, Shah A, Shah SJ: Electrocardiographic predictors of abnormal left ventricular diastolic function: importance of the QTc interval. J Card Fail 2009, 15(6 Suppl 1):S106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sabbah HN, Imai M, Cowart D, et al.: Hemodynamic properties of a new-generation positive luso-inotropic agent for the acute treatment of advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99(2A):41A–46A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Gheorghiade M, Blair JE, Filippatos GS, et al: Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and neurohormonal effects of istaroxime, a novel intravenous inotropic and lusitropic agent: a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51(23):2276–2285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Shah SJ, Blair JE, Filippatos GS, et al.: Effects of istaroxime on diastolic stiffness in acute heart failure syndromes: results from the Hemodynamic, Echocardiographic, and Neurohormonal Effects of Istaroxime, a Novel Intravenous Inotropic and Lusitropic Agent: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure (HORIZON-HF) trial. Am Heart J 2009, 157(6):1035–1041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al.: Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 2008, 358(18):1887–1898.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Davis BR, Kostis JB, Simpson LM, et al.: Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial. Circulation 2008, 118(22):2259–2267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, et al.: Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet 2009, 373(9671):1275–1281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, Krum H, et al.: Renal denervation as a therapeutic approach for hypertension: novel implications for an old concept. Hypertension 2009, 54(6):1195–1201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bisognano JD, de Leeuw PW, Bach DS: Improved cardiac structure and diastolic flow velocities in early-stage heart failure with chronic treatment using an implantable device: Results from European and United States trials of the Rheos system [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:A188.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Curtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, et al.: The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42(4):736–742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Guazzi M, Myers J, Arena R: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical and prognostic assessment of diastolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46(10):1883–1890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Gustafsson F, Torp-Pedersen C, Brendorp B, et al.: Long-term survival in patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: relation to preserved and reduced left ventricular systolic function. Eur Heart J 2003, 24(9):863–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kirk V, Bay M, Parner J, et al.: N-terminal proBNP and mortality in hospitalised patients with heart failure and preserved vs. reduced systolic function: data from the prospective Copenhagen Hospital Heart Failure Study (CHHF). Eur J Heart Fail 2004, 6(3):335–341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. MacCarthy PA, Kearney MT, Nolan J, et al.: Prognosis in heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003, 327(7406):78–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Macin SM, Perna ER, Cimbaro Canella JP, et al.: Differences in clinical profile and outcome in patients with decompensated heart failure and systolic dysfunction or preserved systolic function [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004, 57(1):45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. McAlister FA, Teo KK, Taher M, et al.: Insights into the contemporary epidemiology and outpatient management of congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1999, 138(1 Pt 1):87–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ojeda S, Anguita M, Munoz JF, et al.: Clinical characteristics and medium-term prognosis of patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function. Do they differ in systolic dysfunction [in Spanish]? Rev Esp Cardiol 2003, 56(11):1050–1056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Pernenkil R, Vinson JM, Shah AS, et al.: Course and prognosis in patients > or = 70 years of age with congestive heart failure and normal versus abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79(2):216–219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Smith GL, Masoudi FA, Vaccarino V, et al.: Outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: mortality, readmission, and functional decline. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41(9):1510–1518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Ghali JK, Kadakia S, Bhatt A, et al.: Survival of heart failure patients with preserved versus impaired systolic function: the prognostic implication of blood pressure. Am Heart J 1992, 123(4 Pt 1):993–997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kupari M, Lindroos M, Iivanainen AM, et al.: Congestive heart failure in old age: prevalence, mechanisms and 4-year prognosis in the Helsinki Ageing Study. J Intern Med 1997, 241(5):387–394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Madsen BK, Hansen JF, Stokholm KH, et al.: Chronic congestive heart failure. Description and survival of 190 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of chronic congestive heart failure based on clinical signs and symptoms. Eur Heart J 1994, 15(3):303–310.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Andersson B, Hall C: N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide and prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function. J Card Fail 2000, 6(3):208–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Shah is supported by an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant, a Northwestern Memorial Foundation Eleanor Wood Prince Grant, a Northwestern Memorial Foundation Dixon Translational Research Award, and an Actelion Entelligence Investigator Award. His research also has been supported in the past by a Heart Failure Society of America Research Fellowship Award and an American Society of Echocardiography Career Development Award.

Disclosure

Dr. Shah has served on an advisory board for Gilead Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjiv J. Shah MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, S.J. Evolving Approaches to the Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 12, 58–75 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-009-0060-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-009-0060-2

Keywords

Navigation