Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exercise for people with osteoporosis: Translating the science into clinical practice

  • Published:
Current Osteoporosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The "holy grail" of inquiry regarding exercise and osteoporosis has been identifying a type of exercise that builds bone. Investigation using animal models has provided many insights into how bone responds to mechanical loading, but translating these findings into an exercise prescription for patients with osteoporosis is difficult. Patients expect bone to respond to exercise in a linear fashion, such as they are accustomed to experiencing with muscles in response to progressive strength training or with the cardiopulmonary system in response to endurance training. If the skeleton accrued greater mass in response to increasing intensity and duration of mechanical strain, our bones would weigh so much that we could not move. A unique requirement of bone is that adaptations to loading produce the strongest and the lightest structure. More exercise is not always better, but we are not yet sure exactly what and how much is enough and what and how much is too much. This complexity stymies clear communication, both in the clinic and in public health initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Lanyon LE: Using functional loading to influence bone mass and architecture: objectives, mechanisms, and relationship with estrogen of the mechanically adaptive process in bone. Bone 1996, 18:37S-43S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skerry TM, Suva LJ: Investigation of the regulation of bone mass by mechanical loading: from quantitative cytochemistry to gene array. Cell Biochem Funct 2003, 21:223–229.A comprehensive but concise history of the investigation of the effects of mechanical loading on bone. The authors emphasize the work in osteocytes since 1984 and the contributions of Joe Chayen and collaborators.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner CH, Robling AG: Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength [review]. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2003, 31:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seeman E: Editorial: an exercise in geometry. J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17:373–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frost HM: Why do marathon runners have less bone than weight lifters? A vital-biomechanical view and explanation. Bone 1997, 20:183–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mosekilde L: Osteoporosis and exercise. Bone 1995, 17:193–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawkey A: The importance of exercising in space. Interdiscip Sci Rev 2003, 28:130–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krolner B, Toft B: Vertebral bone loss: an unheeded side effect of therapeutic bed rest. Clin Sci 1983, 64:537–540.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein S, Inzerillo AM, Caminis J, et al.: Disorders associated with acute rapid and severe bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18:2083–2094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalsky PG, Stocke KS, Ehsani AA, et al.: Weight-bearing exercise training and lumbar bone mineral content in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 1988, 108:824–828.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woolf I, Van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HCG, et al.: The effect of exercise training programs on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 1999, 9:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Layne JE, Nelson ME: The effects of progressive resistance training on bone density: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999, 31:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kerr D, Morton A, Dick I, et al.: Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site-specific and loaddependent. J Bone Min Res 1996, 11:218–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, et al.: Effects of high intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1994, 272:1909–1914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackelvie KJ, McKay HA, Petit MA, et al.: Bone mineral response to a 7-month randomized controlled, school-based jumping intervention in 121 prepubertal boys: associations with ethnicity and body mass index. J Bone Miner Res 2002, 834–844.

  16. Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al.: Randomised controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 1996, 348:1343–1347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassey J, Ramsdale S: Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise. Osteoporos Int 1994, 4:72–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cardinale M, Wakeling J: Whole body vibration exercise: are vibrations good for you? Br J Sports Med 2005, 39:585–589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Verschueren SMP, Roelants M, Delecluse C, et al.: Effect of 6-month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:352–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grifin MJ: Predicting the hazards of whole-body vibration: considerations of a standard. Ind Health 1998, 36:83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, et al.: Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature 2001, 412:603–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ward K, Alsop C, Caulton J, et al.: Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions. J Bone Min Res 2004, 19:360–369.A well-designed randomized clinical trial showing that tibial trabecular bone mineral density measured by quantitative CT can be improved by low-magnitude vibration in a vulnerable patient population.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilsanz V, Wren TAL, Sanchez M, et al.: Low-level, high frequency mechanical signals enhance musculoskeletal development of young women with low BMD. J Bone Miner Res 2006, 21:1464–1474.In this randomized clinical trial, the low-magnitude vibration group had significantly improved lumbar cancellous bone, hip cortical bone, and paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area compared with controls. A threshold for compliance of only 2 minutes of vibration per day was established to be beneficial.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang L, Fritton SP, Cowin SC, Weinbaum S: Fluid pressure relaxation depends upon osteonal microstructure: modeling an oscillatory bending experiment. J Biomech 1999, 32:663–672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubin C, Recker R, Cullen D, et al.: Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by a low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli: a clinical trial assessing compliance, efficacy, and safety. J Bone Min Res 2004, 19:343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F, et al.: Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 2002, 112:281–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hetland ML, Haarbo J, Christiansen C: Low bone mass and high bone turnover in male long distance runners. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993, 77:770–775.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Michel B, Lane NE, Bloch DA, et al.: Effect of changes in weight-bearing exercise on lumbar bone mass after age fifty. Ann Int Med 1991, 23:397–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Binder EF, Brown M, Sinacore DR, et al.: Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 292:837–846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schultz AB, Andersson GBJ, Hadersperk K, et al.: Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. J Biomech 1982, 15:669–675.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bouxsein ML, Myers ER, Hayes WC: Biomechanics of age-related fractures. In Osteoporosis. Edited by Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J. Orlando, FL: Academic Press;1996:373–393.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Itoi E, Sinaki M: Effect of back-strengthening exercise on posture in healthy women 49 to 65 years of age. Mayo Clin Proc 1994, 69:1954–1959.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Greendale GA, McDivit A, Carpenter A, et al.: Yoga for women with hyperkyphosis: results of a pilot study. Am J Public Health 2002, 92:1611–1614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gold DT, Shipp KM, Pieper CF, et al.: Group treatment improves trunk strength and psychological status in older women with vertebral fractures: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Amer Geriatr Soc 2004, 52:1471–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC, et al.: Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, 3:CD000340.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karlsson M: Does exercise reduce the burden of fractures? Acta Orthop Scand 2002, 73:691–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sinaki M, Mikkelsen BA: Postmenopausal spinal osteoporosis: Flexion versus extension exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984, 65:593–596.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sinaki M, Wahner HW, Wollan P, et al.: Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women. Bone 2002, 30:836–841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3907, 27710, Durham, NC, USA

    Kathy M. Shipp PT, MHS, PhD

Authors
  1. Kathy M. Shipp PT, MHS, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathy M. Shipp PT, MHS, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shipp, K.M. Exercise for people with osteoporosis: Translating the science into clinical practice. Curr Osteoporos Rep 4, 129–133 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-996-0020-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-996-0020-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation