Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Approaches to Fracture Risk Assessment and Prevention

  • Epidemiology and Pathophysiology (D Shoback and G El-Hajj Fuleihan, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Osteoporosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To critically assess recent evidence concerning osteoporosis fracture risk.

Recent Findings

Robust instruments exist for predicting factures incorporating well-documented risk factors especially prior fracture whose magnitude varies with site, occurrence time, and age. Stratifying time-since-prior fracture has resulted in the concept of imminent fracture risk and increased focus on secondary fracture prevention. Secondary fracture prevention recommendations include fracture liaison service, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic multidisciplinary intervention, and communicating that fractures in older adults are the predictable consequence of underlying osteoporosis rather than unfortunate accidents.

Summary

Quality improvement in osteoporosis care includes diagnosing osteoporosis on the basis of clinical fractures rather than exclusively relying on bone density testing; applying diagnostic rather than screening approaches to patients with prior fractures; regularly updating fall and fracture histories; performing a physical exam focused on spinal curvature, posture, and musculoskeletal function; reviewing images to identify prevalent fractures that may have been missed; and general use of fracture risk algorithms at all stages of osteoporosis management. Communicating effectively with patients about osteoporosis and fractures, their consequences, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological management is the cornerstone of high-value care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Litwic A, Lekarz, Warwick D, Dennison E. Distal radius fracture: Cinderella of the osteoporotic fractures. Orthopedic and Muscular System: Current Research. 2014;3(3).

  3. Kanis JA, Diseases WHOCfMB. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level: WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School; 2008.

  4. Curtis EM, Harvey NC, Cooper C. The burden of osteoporosis. In: Harvey NC, Cooper C, editors. Osteoporosis: a life course epidemiology approach to skeletal health. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(6):781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings SR, Black DM, Rubin SM. Lifetime risks of hip, Colles’, or vertebral fracture and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(11):2445–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(1):38–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2009;301(5):513–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hindmarsh DM, Hayen A, Finch CF, Close JC. Relative survival after hospitalisation for hip fracture in older people in New South Wales, Australia. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(2):221–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colon-Emeric CS, Vanderschueren D, Milisen K, Velkeniers B, et al. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(6):380–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Solomon DH, Johnston SS, Boytsov NN, McMorrow D, Lane JM, Krohn KD. Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(9):1929–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Chakhtoura M, Cauley JA, Chamoun N. Worldwide fracture prediction. J Clin Densitom. 2017;20(3):397–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E. FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone. 2009;44(5):734–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(8):1109–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(10):1431–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ. 2009;339:b4229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e3427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Leslie WD. Overview of fracture prediction tools. J Clin Densitom. 2017;20(3):444–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Leslie WD, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Lamy O, Oden A, McCloskey EV, et al. Lumbar spine texture enhances 10-year fracture probability assessment. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(9):2271–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leslie WD, Aubry-Rozier B, Lamy O, Hans D, Manitoba Bone Density P. TBS (trabecular bone score) and diabetes-related fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(4):721–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, et al. Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(3):175–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen L, Petersen KD, Eriksen SA, Langdahl BL, Eiken PA, Brixen K, et al. Subsequent fracture rates in a nationwide population-based cohort study with a 10-year perspective. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(2):513–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35(2):375–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sajjan SG, Barrett-Connor E, McHorney CA, Miller PD, Sen SS, Siris E. Rib fracture as a predictor of future fractures in young and older postmenopausal women: National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(3):821–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(5):821–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Geel TA, van Helden S, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Dinant GJ. Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(1):99–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD, Manitoba Bone Density Program. Time since prior fracture is a risk modifier for 10-year osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(6):1400–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johansson H, Siggeirsdottir K, Harvey NC, Oden A, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, et al. Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(3):775–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Harvey NC, Gudnason V, Sanders KM, et al. Characteristics of recurrent fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(8):1747–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Balasubramanian A, Zhang J, Chen L, Wenkert D, Daigle SG, Grauer A, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture after prior fracture among older women. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(1):79–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Banefelt J, Akesson KE, Spangeus A, Ljunggren O, Karlsson L, Strom O, et al. Risk of imminent fracture following a previous fracture in a Swedish database study. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(3):601–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmed LA, Center JR, Bjornerem A, Bluic D, Joakimsen RM, Jorgensen L, et al. Progressively increasing fracture risk with advancing age after initial incident fragility fracture: the Tromso study. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(10):2214–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Leslie WD, Schousboe JT, Morin SN, Martineau P, Lix LM, Johansson H, et al. Fracture risk following high-trauma versus low-trauma fracture: a registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(6):1059–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM, Martineau P, Bryanton M, McCloskey EV, et al. Fracture prediction from self-reported falls in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(11):2195–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Harvey NC, Oden A, Orwoll E, Lapidus J, Kwok T, Karlsson MK, et al. Falls predict fractures independently of FRAX probability: a Meta-Analysis of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(3):510–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Masud T, Binkley N, Boonen S, Hannan MT, Members FPDC. Official positions for FRAX(R) clinical regarding falls and frailty: can falls and frailty be used in FRAX(R)? From Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(R). J Clin Densitom. 2011;14(3):194–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Poiana C, Capatina C. Fracture risk assessment in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Densitom. 2017;20(3):432–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Majumdar SR, Leslie WD, Lix LM, Morin SN, Johansson H, Oden A, et al. Longer duration of diabetes strongly impacts fracture risk assessment: the Manitoba BMD cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(11):4489–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Leslie WD, Johansson H, McCloskey EV, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Hans D. Comparison of methods for improving fracture risk assessment in diabetes: the Manitoba BMD registry. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(11):1923–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Valentini A, Cianfarani MA, De Meo L, Morabito P, Romanello D, Tarantino U, et al. FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA1c in estimating fracture risk. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(10):1043–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gourlay ML, Ritter VS, Fine JP, Overman RA, Schousboe JT, Cawthon PM, et al. Comparison of fracture risk assessment tools in older men without prior hip or spine fracture: the MrOS study. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Crandall CJ, Larson J, LaCroix A, Cauley JA, LeBoff MS, Li W, et al. Predicting fracture risk in younger postmenopausal women: comparison of the Garvan and FRAX risk calculators in the Women’s Health Initiative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(2):235–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Premaor M, Parker RA, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Cauley JA, Lui LY, et al. Predictive value of FRAX for fracture in obese older women. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(1):188–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Beaudoin C, Moore L, Gagne M, Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP, et al. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(4):721–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Bilezikian JP. Stop the war on DXA! Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1433(1):12–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee SJ, Graffy PM, Zea RD, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ. Future osteoporotic fracture risk related to lumbar vertebral trabecular attenuation measured at routine body CT. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(5):860–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pickhardt PJ, Lauder T, Pooler BD, Munoz Del Rio A, Rosas H, Bruce RJ, et al. Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(1):147–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gerety EL, Bearcroft PW. L1 vertebral density on CT is too variable with different scanning protocols to be a useful screening tool for osteoporosis in everyday practice. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1084):20170395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu XS, Stein EM, Zhou B, Zhang CA, Nickolas TL, Cohen A, et al. Individual trabecula segmentation (ITS)-based morphological analyses and microfinite element analysis of HR-pQCT images discriminate postmenopausal fragility fractures independent of DXA measurements. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(2):263–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rozental TD, Johannesdottir F, Kempland KC, Bouxsein ML. Characterization of trabecular bone microstructure in premenopausal women with distal radius fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(2):409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Biver E, Durosier-Izart C, Chevalley T, van Rietbergen B, Rizzoli R, Ferrari S. Evaluation of radius microstructure and areal bone mineral density improves fracture prediction in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):328–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kheirollahi H, Luo Y. Assessment of hip fracture risk using cross-section strain energy determined by QCT-based finite element modeling. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:413839.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Leslie WD, Luo Y, Yang S, Goertzen AL, Ahmed S, Delubac I, et al. Fracture risk indices from DXA-based finite element analysis predict incident fractures independently from FRAX: the Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom. 2019;22(3):338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nawathe S, Nguyen BP, Barzanian N, Akhlaghpour H, Bouxsein ML, Keaveny TM. Cortical and trabecular load sharing in the human femoral neck. J Biomech. 2015;48(5):816–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Adams AL, Fischer H, Kopperdahl DL, Lee DC, Black DM, Bouxsein ML, et al. Osteoporosis and hip fracture risk from routine computed tomography scans: the Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS). J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(7):1291–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Roux C, Briot K. Imminent fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(6):1765–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Conley RB, Adib G, Adler RA, Akesson KE, Alexander IM, Amenta KC, et al. Secondary fracture prevention: consensus clinical recommendations from a multistakeholder coalition. JBMR. 2020;35(1):36–52.

  59. Khosla S, Shane E. A crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(8):1485–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Binkley N, Blank RD, Leslie WD, Lewiecki EM, Eisman JA, Bilezikian JP. Osteoporosis in crisis: It's time to focus on fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(7):1391–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Siu A, Allore H, Brown D, Charles ST, Lohman M. National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop: research gaps for long-term drug therapies for osteoporotic fracture prevention. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA, Beard SM, Lock S, McCrink L, et al. Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(7):2083–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Marsh D, Akesson K, Beaton DE, Bogoch ER, Boonen S, Brandi ML, et al. Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(7):2051–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, et al. Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(8):2135–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Liu J, Curtis EM, Cooper C, Harvey NC. State of the art in osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment. J Endocrinol Investig. 2019;42(10):1149–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Fong-Soe-Khioe R, Fordham R, et al. Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10122):741–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, Bruyere O, Veronese N, Lorentzon M, et al. Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(Suppl 1):1–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Lewiecki EM, Wright NC, Curtis JR, Siris E, Gagel RF, Saag KG, et al. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(3):717–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Baim S. The future of fracture risk assessment in the management of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom. 2017;20(3):451–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood JR. Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(7):577–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Morris CA, Carrino JA, Lang P, Solomon DH. Incidental vertebral fractures on chest radiographs. Recognition, documentation, and treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):352–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Majumdar SR, Kim N, Colman I, Chahal AM, Raymond G, Jen H, et al. Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition, and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(8):905–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Wild M, Dankerl P, Hammon M, Uder M, Janka R. Vertebral body fractures of unknown origin in cancer patients receiving MDCT: reporting by radiologists and awareness by clinicians. Springerplus. 2016;5:450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Mitchell RM, Jewell P, Javaid MK, McKean D, Ostlere SJ. Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures? Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Krueger D, Shives E, Siglinsky E, Libber J, Buehring B, Hansen KE, et al. DXA errors are common and reduced by use of a reporting template. J Clin Densitom. 2019;22(1):115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanford Baim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Sanford Baim and Robert Blank declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Epidemiology and Pathophysiology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baim, S., Blank, R. Approaches to Fracture Risk Assessment and Prevention. Curr Osteoporos Rep 19, 158–165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-021-00659-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-021-00659-x

Keywords

Navigation