Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Personalized Management of Type 2 Diabetes

  • Pharmacologic Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (HE Lebovitz and G Bahtiyar, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Our goal is to discuss how to personalize the management of patients with type 2 diabetes by adjusting glycemic targets and tailoring medical therapy to account for unique patient characteristics.

Recent Findings

We review the pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of type 2 diabetes, focusing on potential advantages and disadvantages of each class of agents. We also discuss how to approach specific patient subpopulations and propose a conceptual framework for incorporating these factors into clinical practice.

Summary

As the diabetes treatment landscape rapidly expands, physicians have the exciting opportunity to offer patients increasingly individualized care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019.

  3. American Diabetes A. Economic costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):917–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gregg EW, Li Y, Wang J, Burrows NR, Ali MK, Rolka D, et al. Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990-2010. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(16):1514–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1310799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American Diabetes A. 5. Lifestyle management: standards of medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S46–60. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):854–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bain S, Druyts E, Balijepalli C, Baxter CA, Currie CJ, Das R, et al. Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality associated with sulphonylureas compared with other antihyperglycaemic drugs: a Bayesian meta-analysis of survival data. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(3):329–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Monami M, Genovese S, Mannucci E. Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(10):938–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Varvaki Rados D, Catani Pinto L, Reck Remonti L, Bauermann Leitao C, Gross JL. The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2016;13(4):e1001992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1279–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67528-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Furie KL, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, Gorman M, et al. Pioglitazone after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1321–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiquette E, Ramirez G, Defronzo R. A meta-analysis comparing the effect of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(19):2097–104. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.19.2097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cusi K, Orsak B, Bril F, Lomonaco R, Hecht J, Ortiz-Lopez C, et al. Long-term pioglitazone treatment for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5):305–15. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, Kowdley KV, McCullough A, Diehl AM, Bass NM, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1675–85. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0907929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lago RM, Singh PP, Nesto RW. Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes given thiazolidinediones: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2007;370(9593):1129–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61514-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Thiazolidinediones and heart failure: a teleo-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2148–53. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-0141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(24):2457–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Curtis PS, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, et al. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9681):2125–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60953-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grey A. Skeletal consequences of thiazolidinedione therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(2):129–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0477-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz AV, Sellmeyer DE, Vittinghoff E, Palermo L, Lecka-Czernik B, Feingold KR, et al. Thiazolidinedione use and bone loss in older diabetic adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(9):3349–54. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grey A, Bolland M, Gamble G, Wattie D, Horne A, Davidson J, et al. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone decreases bone formation and bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(4):1305–10. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-2646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Filipova E, Uzunova K, Kalinov K, Vekov T. Pioglitazone and the risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(4):705–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0273-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang H, Shi W, Fu S, Wang T, Zhai S, Song Y, et al. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2018;7(4):1070–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tolman KG, Freston JW, Kupfer S, Perez A. Liver safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with pioglitazone: results from a 3-year, randomized, comparator-controlled study in the US. Drug Saf. 2009;32(9):787–800. https://doi.org/10.2165/11316510-000000000-00000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tkac I, Raz I. Combined analysis of three large interventional trials with gliptins indicates increased incidence of acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(2):284–6. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buse JB, Bethel MA, Green JB, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y, Aschner P, et al. Pancreatic safety of Sitagliptin in the TECOS study. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(2):164–70. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DeVries JH, Rosenstock J. DPP-4 inhibitor-related pancreatitis: rare but real! Diabetes Care. 2017;40(2):161–3. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci16-0035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinto LC, Rados DV, Barkan SS, Leitao CB, Gross JL. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, pancreatic cancer and acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19055-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, Buse JB, Engel SS, Garg J, et al. Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(3):232–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1501352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen OE, Cooper ME, Kahn SE, Marx N, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs placebo on major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular and renal risk: the CARMELINA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scirica BM, Braunwald E, Raz I, Cavender MA, Morrow DA, Jarolim P, et al. Heart failure, saxagliptin, and diabetes mellitus: observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 randomized trial. Circulation. 2014;130(18):1579–88. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zannad F, Cannon CP, Cushman WC, Bakris GL, Menon V, Perez AT, et al. Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9982):2067–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62225-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Davies M, Pieber TR, Hartoft-Nielsen ML, Hansen OKH, Jabbour S, Rosenstock J. Effect of oral semaglutide compared with placebo and subcutaneous semaglutide on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(15):1460–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. •• Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JF, Nauck MA, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):311–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. The LEADER trial studied over 9000 T2DM patients at high CVD risk and showed that treatment with liraglutide led to a 13% reduction in the primary composite cardiac outcome and a 22% reduction in CV death when compared to placebo.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. •• Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jodar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834–44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. SUSTAIN-6 studied over 3000 T2DM patients at high CVD risk and found a 26% reduction in the primary composite cardiac outcome and a 12% reduction in progression of nephropathy in those treated with semaglutide versus placebo.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mann JFE, Orsted DD, Brown-Frandsen K, Marso SP, Poulter NR, Rasmussen S, et al. Liraglutide and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(9):839–48. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1616011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Armstrong MJ, Gaunt P, Aithal GP, Barton D, Hull D, Parker R, et al. Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):679–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00803-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Questions and Answers - Safety Requirements for Victoza (liraglutide). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/questions-and-answers-safety-requirements-victoza-liraglutide. Accessed 25 June 2019.

  40. Li L, Shen J, Bala MM, Busse JW, Ebrahim S, Vandvik PO, et al. Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Monami M, Dicembrini I, Nardini C, Fiordelli I, Mannucci E. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):269–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Halpern A, Krempf M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411892.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Monami M, Nreu B, Scatena A, Cresci B, Andreozzi F, Sesti G, et al. Safety issues with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and cholelithiasis): data from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(9):1233–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Faillie JL, Yu OH, Yin H, Hillaire-Buys D, Barkun A, Azoulay L. Association of bile duct and gallbladder diseases with the use of incretin-based drugs in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1474–81. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. FDA briefing materials - Liraglutide (April 2009) www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/09/briefing/2009-4422b2-01-FDA.pdf. Accessed April 2019.

  46. Bjerre Knudsen L, Madsen LW, Andersen S, Almholt K, de Boer AS, Drucker DJ, et al. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists activate rodent thyroid C-cells causing calcitonin release and C-cell proliferation. Endocrinology. 2010;151(4):1473–86. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-1272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Andreadis P, Karagiannis T, Malandris K, Avgerinos I, Liakos A, Manolopoulos A, et al. Semaglutide for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(9):2255–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vilsboll T, Bain SC, Leiter LA, Lingvay I, Matthews D, Simo R, et al. Semaglutide, reduction in glycated haemoglobin and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(4):889–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fadini GP, Sarangdhar M, Avogaro A. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are not associated with retinal adverse events in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6(1):e000475. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sharma T, Paixao R, Villabona C. GLP-1 agonist associated acute kidney injury: a case report and review. Diabetes Metab. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2017.12.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. •• Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. The CANVAS trial studied over 10,000 T2DM patients at risk for CVD who were treated with canagliflozin and found a 14% reduction in the primary composite cardiac outcome when compared to placebo.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mahaffey KW, Neal B, Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the CANVAS program (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study). Circulation. 2018;137(4):323–34. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, von Eynatten M, Mattheus M, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):323–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1515920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shibuya T, Fushimi N, Kawai M, Yoshida Y, Hachiya H, Ito S, et al. Luseogliflozin improves liver fat deposition compared to metformin in type 2 diabetes patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):438–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ito D, Shimizu S, Inoue K, Saito D, Yanagisawa M, Inukai K, et al. Comparison of ipragliflozin and pioglitazone effects on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 24-week, open-label, active-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(10):1364–72. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sumida Y, Yoneda M. Current and future pharmacological therapies for NAFLD/NASH. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(3):362–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1415-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Mainou M, Liakos A, Bekiari E, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(4):262–74. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Peters AL, Buschur EO, Buse JB, Cohan P, Diner JC, Hirsch IB. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: a potential complication of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(9):1687–93. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Palmer BF, Clegg DJ, Taylor SI, Weir MR. Diabetic ketoacidosis, sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitors and the kidney. J Diabetes Complicat. 2016;30(6):1162–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Fralick M, Schneeweiss S, Patorno E. Risk of diabetic ketoacidosis after initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2300–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1701990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Investigators OT, Gerstein HC, Bosch J, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Jung H, et al. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):319–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1203858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, Poulter NR, Emerson SS, Pieber TR, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):723–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615692.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Bolli GB, Riddle MC, Bergenstal RM, Ziemen M, Sestakauskas K, Goyeau H, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(4):386–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Wysham C, Bhargava A, Chaykin L, de la Rosa R, Handelsman Y, Troelsen LN, et al. Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the SWITCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. American DA. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S90–S102. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. American Diabetes A. 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S61–70. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2669–701. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2019 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2019;25(1):69–100. https://doi.org/10.4158/CS-2018-0535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. LeRoith D, Biessels GJ, Braithwaite SS, Casanueva FF, Draznin B, Halter JB, et al. Treatment of diabetes in older adults: an endocrine society* clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1520–74. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-00198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. American Diabetes A. 12. Older adults: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S139–S47. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. American Diabetes A. 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S103–S23. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. United States Renal Data System. Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population. https://www.usrds.org/2018/view/v1_01.aspx. Accessed 25 June 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, FMP 106, P.O. Box 208020, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA

    Patricia R. Peter & Beatrice C. Lupsa

Authors
  1. Patricia R. Peter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beatrice C. Lupsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia R. Peter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Patricia R. Peter and Beatrice C. Lupsa declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pharmacologic Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peter, P.R., Lupsa, B.C. Personalized Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 19, 115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1244-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1244-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation