Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function

  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) function is a powerful prognostic factor in congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension, but assessing RV function is a challenge because of the right ventricle’s complex geometry, its extreme sensitivity to loading conditions, and a limited understanding of underlying mechanisms of right heart failure. At present, a single widely accepted and generally applicable index of RV function is not available. Current approaches to assessment of RV function include physical examination, catheterization, conventional contrast and radionuclide angiography, nuclear perfusion scintigraphy, cardiac CT, MRI, echocardiography, and positron emission tomography. This review will discuss assessment of RV function in the context of RV physiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Starr I, Jeffers WA, Meade RH. The absence of conspicuous increments of venous pressure after severe damage to the RV of the dog, with discussion of the relation between clinical congestive heart failure and heart disease. Am Heart J. 1943;26:291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simon MA, Deible C, Mathier MA, Lacomis J, Goitein O, Shroff SG, et al. Phenotyping the right ventricle in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Clin Transl Sci. 2009;2(4):294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Warnes CA. Adult congenital heart disease importance of the right ventricle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(21):1903–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zornoff LA, Skali H, Pfeffer MA, St John Sutton M, Rouleau JL, Lamas GA, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and risk of heart failure and mortality after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(9):1450–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Groote P, Millaire A, Foucher-Hossein C, Nugue O, Marchandise X, Ducloux G, et al. Right ventricular ejection fraction is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(4):948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldhaber SZ. Thrombolytic therapy for patients with pulmonary embolism who are hemodynamically stable but have right ventricular dysfunction: pro. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(19):2197–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. •• Haddad F, Doyle R, Murphy DJ, Hunt SA. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part II: pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management of right ventricular failure. Circulation. 2008;117(13):1717–31. This is a very good overview of right heart pathophysiology, and the limited treatment options currently available.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greyson CR, Schwartz GG, Lu L, Ye S, Helmke S, Xu Y, et al. Calpain inhibition attenuates right ventricular contractile dysfunction after acute pressure overload. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44(1):59–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dewachter C, Dewachter L, Rondelet B, Fesler P, Brimioulle S, Kerbaul F, et al. Activation of apoptotic pathways in experimental acute afterload-induced right ventricular failure. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(6):1405–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mani SK, Shiraishi H, Balasubramanian S, Yamane K, Chellaiah M, Cooper G, et al. In vivo administration of calpeptin attenuates calpain activation and cardiomyocyte loss in pressure-overloaded feline myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295(1):H314–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dell’Italia LJ, Walsh RA. Right ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations and regional dimensions during acute alterations in loading conditions. Circulation. 1988;77(6):1276–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Redington AN, Gray HH, Hodson ME, Rigby ML, Oldershaw PJ. Characterisation of the normal right ventricular pressure-volume relation by biplane angiography and simultaneous micromanometer pressure measurements. Br Heart J. 1988;59(1):23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson CJ, Bonow RO. Cardiac catheterization. In: Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, editors. Heart disease, vol. 1. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 2001. p. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Champion HC, Michelakis ED, Hassoun PM. Comprehensive invasive and noninvasive approach to the right ventricle-pulmonary circulation unit: state of the art and clinical and research implications. Circulation. 2009;120(11):992–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hein M, Roehl AB, Baumert JH, Rossaint R, Steendijk P. Continuous right ventricular volumetry by fast-response thermodilution during right ventricular ischemia: head-to-head comparison with conductance catheter measurements. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(11):2962–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfluger HB, Maeder MT, LaGerche A, Taylor AJ. One- and two-dimensional estimation of right and left ventricular size and function-comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging volumetric analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2010;19(9):541–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Orlov MV, Ansari MM, Akrivakis ST, Jadidi A, Nijhof N, Natan SR, et al. First experience with rotational angiography of the right ventricle to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(2):207–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sibille L, Bouallegue FB, Bourdon A, Micheau A, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, Mariano-Goulart D. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32(2):121–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim TH, Ryu YH, Hur J, Kim SJ, Kim HS, Choi BW, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular volume and mass using retrospective ECG-gated cardiac multidetector computed tomography: comparison with first-pass radionuclide angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(9):1987–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao Y, Du X, Liang L, Cao L, Yang Q, Li K. Evaluation of right ventricular function by 64-row CT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cor pulmonale. Eur J Radiol. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.004.

  21. •• Horton KD, Meece RW, Hill JC. Assessment of the right ventricle by echocardiography: a primer for cardiac sonographers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(7):776–92. This is a comprehensive handbook on RV echocardiography for cardiac sonographers, with detailed recommendations on imaging windows, standard views, measurement standards, methods of hemodynamic assessment, and technical tips. Although intended for sonographers, it also provides numerous examples and figures that will be useful to cardiologists and trainees.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. •• Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685–713. This is a compendium of nearly every echocardiographic technique ever published for evaluation of the right ventricle; it should be a standard reference in every echo laboratory. However, it provides minimal guidance as to what is and is not actually useful.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimada YJ, Shiota M, Siegel RJ, Shiota T. Accuracy of right ventricular volumes and function determined by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(9):943–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. •• Tamborini G, Marsan NA, Gripari P, Maffessanti F, Brusoni D, Muratori M, et al. Reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: evaluation in a large series of normal subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(2):109–15. Few cardiologists have much experience with three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. For those who wish to begin using these techniques, this provides useful tables of normal values.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leibundgut G, Rohner A, Grize L, Bernheim A, Kessel-Schaefer A, Bremerich J, et al. Dynamic assessment of right ventricular volumes and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging in 100 adult patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(2):116–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Naehle CP, Strach K, Thomas D, Meyer C, Linhart M, Bitaraf S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):549–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourantas CV, Loh HP, Bragadeesh T, Rigby AS, Lukaschuk EI, Garg S, et al. Relationship between right ventricular volumes measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13(1):52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sallach JA, Tang WH, Borowski AG, Tong W, Porter T, Martin MG, et al. Right atrial volume index in chronic systolic heart failure and prognosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(5):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. • La Gerche A, Jurcut R, Voigt J-U. Right ventricular function by strain echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010;22(5):430–6. This is a nice overview of deformation imaging.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meris A, Faletra F, Conca C, Klersy C, Regoli F, Klimusina J, et al. Timing and magnitude of regional right ventricular function: a speckle tracking-derived strain study of normal subjects and patients with right ventricular dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(8):823–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang HS, Mookadam F, Warsame TA, Khandheria BK, Tajik JA, Chandrasekaran K. Evaluation of right ventricular global and regional function during stress echocardiography using novel velocity vector imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11(2):157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lopez-Candales A, Edelman K, Candales MD. Right ventricular apical contractility in acute pulmonary embolism: the McConnell sign revisited. Echocardiography. 2010;27(6):614–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Park JH, Park YS, Kim YJ, Lee IS, Kim JH, Lee JH, et al. Differentiation between acute and chronic cor pulmonales with midventricular systolic strain of the right ventricle in the emergency department. Heart Vessels. 2010. doi:10.1007/s00380-010-0072-6.

  34. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM. Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1984;107(3):526–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Meluzín J. Pulsed Doppler tissue imaging of the velocity of tricuspid annular systolic motion. A new, rapid, and non-invasive method of evaluating right ventricular systolic function. Eur Heart J. 2001;22(4):340–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lopezcandales A, Rajagopalan N, Saxena N, Gulyasy B, Edelman K, Bazaz R. Right ventricular systolic function is not the sole determinant of tricuspid annular motion. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(7):973–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Giusca S, Dambrauskaite V, Scheurwegs C, D’Hooge J, Claus P, Herbots L, et al. Deformation imaging describes right ventricular function better than longitudinal displacement of the tricuspid ring. Heart. 2009;96(4):281–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Youssef A, el SH Ibrahim, Korosoglou G, Abraham MR, Weiss RG, Osman NF. Strain-encoding cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessment of right-ventricular regional function. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shehata ML, Basha TA, Tantawy WH, Lima JA, Vogel-Claussen J, Bluemke DA, et al. Real-time single-heartbeat fast strain-encoded imaging of right ventricular regional function: normal versus chronic pulmonary hypertension. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64(1):98–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. • Ristow B, Schiller NB. Obtaining accurate hemodynamics from echocardiography: achieving independence from right heart catheterization. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010;25(5):437–44. This is a comprehensive overview of echocardiographic assessment of RV and LV hemodynamics from a leader in the field; unusually and refreshingly conservative in its recommendations.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, Ronan A, Shah D, Vasaiwala S, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(7):857–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. •• Fisher MR, Forfia PR, Chamera E, Housten-Harris T, Champion HC, Girgis RE, et al. Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(7):615–21. This depressing but very influential report has reduced the confidence pulmonary hypertension specialists place in echocardiographic estimation pulmonary pressures, and has substantially increased referrals for right heart catheterization.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weissler AM, Harris WS, Schoenfeld CD. Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation. 1968;37(2):149–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, McGoon MD, Tajik AJ, et al. Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(6):838–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Karnati PK, El-Hajjar M, Torosoff M, Fein SA. Myocardial performance index correlates with right ventricular ejection fraction measured by nuclear ventriculography. Echocardiography. 2008;25(4):381–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zimbarra Cabrita I, Ruisanchez C, Dawson D, Grapsa J, North B, Howard LS, et al. Right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary hypertension; the value of myocardial performance index measured by tissue Doppler imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11(8):719–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nogami M, Ohno Y, Koyama H, Kono A, Takenaka D, Kataoka T, et al. Utility of phase contrast MR imaging for assessment of pulmonary flow and pressure estimation in patients with pulmonary hypertension: comparison with right heart catheterization and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(5):973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gomez A, Bialostozky D, Zajarias A, Santos E, Palomar A, Martinez ML, et al. Right ventricular ischemia in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(4):1137–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mielniczuk LM, Birnie D, Ziadi MC, deKemp RA, DaSilva JN, Burwash I, et al. The relationship between right ventricular function and increased right ventricular [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(1):59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  50. •• Strain Rate Imaging [http://folk.ntnu.no/stoylen/strainrate/#Motion]. This is an outstanding website with numerous examples and animated explanations of deformation imaging; not a specific emphasis on the right ventricle, but still very useful.

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford R. Greyson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greyson, C.R. Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function. Curr Cardiol Rep 13, 194–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-011-0174-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-011-0174-5

Keywords

Navigation