Abstract
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to consolidate and present the most recent literature on colpocleisis in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Recent Findings
Since its origin in the 1800s, the techniques for colpocleisis have remain largely unchanged. We will review the peri-operative considerations for a patient undergoing an obliterative procedure, specifically focusing on the potential concern for uterine pathology. There are no universally accepted guidelines for endometrial evaluation in the asymptomatic post-menopausal patient, yet the majority of providers prefer to perform some type of pre-operative endometrial evaluation. Colpocleisis can be performed with hysterectomy as a part of the procedure, as a uterine-sparing procedure, or in a patient who has already had a hysterectomy. Performing a hysterectomy at the time of colpocleisis is associated with longer operating times and higher estimated blood loss, but removal of the uterus negates the concern for future uterine pathology. Anti-incontinence procedures are commonly performed concomitantly. Complications following colpocleisis are not common. As the life expectancy in the USA and medical comorbidities increase, future studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.
Summary
Colpocleisis is a minimally invasive and safe procedure which demonstrates consistently high rates of patient satisfaction. Female pelvic reconstructive surgeons should be comfortable with offering obliterative procedures as an option for patients desiring definitive treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):141–8.
Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278–83.
• Suskind AM, Jin C, Walter LC, Finlayson E. Frailty and the role of obliterative versus reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a national study. J Urol. 2017;197(6):1502–6 This trial found that frailty was more strongly associated with post-operative complications compared to age.
Adair FL, DaSef L. The Le Fort colpocleisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1936;32(2):218–26.
Evans J, Silva WA, Karram MM. Chapter 27: Obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. In: Urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery, 4th Edition. Elsevier; 2014.
Brubaker L, Bump R, Fynes M, Jacquetin B, Karram M, Kreder K, et al. Chapter 21: Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Skoczylas LC, Turner LC, Wang L, Winger DG, Sheperd JP. Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):471–7.
Jones K, Wang G, Romano R, St Marie P, Harmanli O. Colpocleisis: a survey of current practice patterns. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(4):276–80.
van Hanegem N, Breijer MC, Khan KS, Clark TJ, Burger MPM, Mol BWJ, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of the endometrium in postmenopausal bleeding: an evidence-based approach. Maturitas. 2011;68(2):155–64.
Ackenbom MF, Giugale LE, Wang Y, Shepherd JP. Incidence of occult uterine pathology in women undergoing hysterectomy with pelvic organ prolapse repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(5):332–5.
• Bochenska K, Leader-Cramer A, Mueller M, Davé B, Alverdy A, Kenton K. Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1671–5 Serious adverse events are rare following colpocleisis.
Hill AJ, Walters MD, Unger CA. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):501.e1–6.
Moore RD, Miklos JR. Colpocleisis and tension-free vaginal tape sling for severe uterine and vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence under local anesthesia. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10(2):276–80.
Sanghani R, Rice NT, Zimmerman CW. Complete procidentia: temporizing treatment with an obstetric balloon. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):56–7.
Dessie SG, Rosenblatt PL. Use of a vessel loop to ensure tunnel patency during LeFort colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1541–3.
Kovac RS, Carl W. Chapter 22: Colpocleisis. In: Advances in reconstructive vaginal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 283–9.
Abbasy S, Lowenstein L, Pham T, Mueller ER, Kenton K, Brubaker L. Urinary retention is uncommon after colpocleisis with concomitant mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(2):213–6.
FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Colpocleisis and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1241–4.
Smith AL, Karp DR, Lefevre R, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. LeFort colpocleisis and stress incontinence: weighing the risk of voiding dysfunction with sling placement. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1357–62.
Song X, Zhu L, Ding J, Xu T, Lang J. Long-term follow-up after LeFort colpocleisis: patient satisfaction, regret rate, and pelvic symptoms. Menopause. 2016;23(6):621–5.
Winkelman WD, Haviland MJ, Elkadry EA. Long-term pelvic floor symptoms, recurrence, satisfaction, and regret following colpocleisis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;
Oliphant SS, Shepherd JP, Lowder JL. Midurethral sling for treatment of occult stress urinary incontinence at the time of colpocleisis: a decision analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(4):216–20.
Mueller MG, Ellimootil C, Abernethy MG, Mueller ER, Hohmann S, Kenton K. Colpocleisis: a safe, minimally invasive option for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(1):30–3.
Krissi H, Aviram A, Ram E, Eitan R, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Colpocleisis surgery in women over 80 years old with severe triple compartment pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;195:206–9.
Catanzarite T, Rambachan A, Mueller MG, Pilecki MA, Kim JYS, Kenton K. Risk factors for 30-day perioperative complications after Le Fort colpocleisis. J Urol. 2014;192(3):788–92.
Liang J, Owens L, Gomelsky A. Vaginal evisceration following colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(8):1265–6.
Mikos T, Chatzipanteli M, Grimbizis GF, Tarlatzis BC. Enlightening the mechanisms of POP recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis. Case report and review. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(7):971–8.
Wang X, Chen Y, Hua K. Pelvic symptoms, body image, and regret after LeFort colpocleisis: a long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Apr;24(3):415–9.
Shayya RF, Weinstein MM, Lukacz ES. Pyometra after Le Fort colpocleisis resolved with interventional radiology drainage. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(2 Pt 2):566–8.
Gutman RE, Bradley CS, Ye W, Markland AD, Whitehead WE, Fitzgerald MP, et al. Effects of colpocleisis on bowel symptoms among women with severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(4):461–6.
Eisenberg VH, Alcalay M, Steinberg M, Weiner Z, Schiff E, Itskovitz-Eldor J, et al. Use of ultrasound in the clinical evaluation of women following colpocleisis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(4):447–51.
Harmanli O, Celik H, Jones KA, Yadav P, Myers T. Minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer after LeFort colpocleisis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(4):242–4.
Ratner ES, Erekson EA, Minkin MJ, Foran-Tuller KA. Sexual satisfaction in the elderly female population: a special focus on women with gynecologic pathology. Maturitas. 2011;70(3):210–5.
Fitzgerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, Ye W, Visco AC, Cundiff GW, et al. Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1603–9.
• Katsara A, Wight E, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Kavvadias T. Long-term quality of life, satisfaction, pelvic floor symptoms and regret after colpocleisis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(5):999–1003 Colpocleisis is an effective procedure with a positive impact on quality of life.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Stress Incontinence and Prolapse
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samimi, P., Zimmerman, C. Colpocleisis for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 15, 25–29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-019-00568-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-019-00568-x