Abstract
Recently, many states passed laws requiring pre- and in-service teachers to receive professional development in dyslexia awareness. Even though misconceptions regarding dyslexia are widespread, there is a paucity of research on how to effectively remove misconceptions and replace them with accurate knowledge. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a researcher-created refutation text grounded in conceptual change theory could produce significant conceptual change in preservice teacher knowledge of dyslexia when compared with a control text about dyslexia (Dyslexia Basics, International Dyslexia Association; IDA, 2018). A sample of preservice teachers (n = 97) was randomly assigned to either the Dyslexia Basics text (n = 48) or the refutation text (n = 49). A one-way repeated ANOVA was used to identify if growth rates from pretest to posttest were differential across conditions. Results suggest that while both texts affect conceptions, the refutation text outperformed the Dyslexia Basics text (n = 97), η2 = 0.33. Effects were maintained at a delayed posttest (n = 75), η2 = 0.175. Interaction effects suggested that the amount of reading coursework did not moderate conceptual change. Implications for facilitating conceptual change of dyslexia will be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. J. (1994). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Aguilar, S. J., Polikoff, M. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2019). Refutation texts: A new approach to changing public misconceptions about education policy. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19849416.
Allington, R. L. (1982). The persistence of teacher beliefs in facets of the visual perceptual deficit hypothesis. The Elementary School Journal, 82(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1086/461272.
Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of pre-service teachers. Reading Teacher, 57(6), 554–565.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Shimada, S., & Apel, K. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5.
Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Hougen, M. (2012). Peter effect in the preparation of reading teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.601434.
Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9274-x.
Castillo, A., & Gilger, J. W. (2018). Adult perceptions of children with dyslexia in the USA. Annals of Dyslexia, 68(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-0163-0.
Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5.
Daniel, S. S., Walsh, A. K., Goldston, D. B., Arnold, E. M., Reboussin, B. A., & Wood, F. B. (2006). Suicidality, school dropout, and reading problems among adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390060301.
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_5.
Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040701455171.
Fleury, V. P., Trevors, G., & Kendeou, P. (2019). Public perception of autism treatments: The role of credibility and evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03868-z.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023477131081.
Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Genetic bases of developmental dyslexia: A capsule review of heritability estimates. Enfance, 56(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.3917/enf.563.0273.
Handler, S. M., & Fierson, W. M. (2011). Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics, 127, e818–e856. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3670.
Heddy, B. C., Danielson, R. W., Sinatra, G. M., & Graham, J. (2017). Modifying knowledge, emotions, and attitudes regarding genetically modified foods. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1260523.
Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21072.
Hernandez, D. J. (2012). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
International Dyslexia Association. Dyslexia Basics. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-basics/ on December 8, 2018.
International Dyslexia Association. Dyslexia assessment: What is it and how can it help. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-assessment-what-is-it-and-how-can-it-help/ on May 23, 2019.
Iovino, I., Fletcher, J. M., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Foorman, B. R. (1998). Colored overlays for visual perceptual deficits in children with reading disability and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Are they differentially effective? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(6), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.20.6.791.1113.
Kearns, D. M., Hancock, R., Hoeft, F., Pugh, K. R., & Frost, S. J. (2019). The neurobiology of dyslexia. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918820051.
Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51(5–6), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2014.913961.
Kilpatrick, D. A. (2018). Genetics, the environment, and poor instruction as contributors to word-level reading difficulties: Does it matter for early identification and instruction? Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 44(3), 25–28.
Knight, C. (2018). What is dyslexia? An exploration of the relationship between teachers' understandings of dyslexia and their training experiences. Dyslexia, 24(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1593.
Langer, N., Peysakhovich, B., Zuk, J., Drottar, M., Sliva, D. D., Smith, S., et al. (2017). White matter alterations in infants at risk for developmental dyslexia. Cerebral Cortex, 27(2), 1027–1036.
Liberman, A. M. (1999). The reading researcher and the reading teacher need the right theory of speech. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_1.
Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00037-2.
Lombardi, D., Danielson, R. W., & Young, N. (2016). A plausible connection: Models examining the relations between evaluation, plausibility, and the refutation text effect. Learning and Instruction, 44, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.03.003.
Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.001.
Lyon, G. R. (2001). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement. Subcommittee on Education Reform Committee on Education and the Workforce US House of Representatives Washington, DC.
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9.
Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2000). Writing and conceptual change. What changes? Instructional Science, 28(3), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003854216687.
Mason, L., Zaccoletti, S., Carretti, B., Scrimin, S., & Diakidoy, I. A. N. (2019). The role of inhibition in conceptual learning from refutation and standard expository texts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 483–501.
Moody, K. C., Roman, M. J., Paulsen, K. A., Freeman, D. H., Haynes, M., & James, T. N. (2000). Prevalence of dyslexia among Texas prison inmates. Texas Medicine, 96(6), 69–75.
Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520709336917.
Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual change in science teaching and learning: Introducing the dynamic model of conceptual change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 151–195. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3349.
Ness, M. K., & Southall, G. (2010). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of and beliefs about dyslexia. Journal of Reading Education, 36(1).
Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-476x(02)00038-3.
Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616267.
Ozernov-Palchik, O., & Gaab, N. (2016). Tackling the ‘dyslexia paradox’: Reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(2), 156–176.
Peltier, T. K., Heddy, B. C., & Peltier, C. (2020a). Dyslexia knowledge questionnaire. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8AYVX.
Peltier, T. K., Heddy, B. C., & Peltier, C. (2020b). Refutation text. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FBYHT.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211–227.
Rodgers, B. (1983). The identification and prevalence of specific reading retardation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02570.x.
Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(5), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199801293380507.
Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199201163260301.
Shtulman, A. (2009). Rethinking the role of resubsumption in conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616275.
Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational psychologist, 40(2), 107–115.
Sinatra, G. M., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.005.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs, 40thAnnual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2018, Washington, D.C. 2018.
Vaughn, A. R., & Johnson, M. L. (2018). Communicating and enhancing teachers’ attitudes and understanding of influenza using refutational text. Vaccine, 36(48), 7306–7315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.040.
Vellutino, F. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3.
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097684.
Wadlington, E. M., & Wadlington, P. L. (2005). What educators really believe about dyslexia. Reading Improvement, 42(1), 16–33.
Washburn, E. K., Binks-Cantrell, E. S., & Joshi, R. M. (2014). What do pre-service teachers from the USA and the UK know about dyslexia? Dyslexia, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1459.
Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Binks-Cantrell, E. S. (2011b). Teacher knowledge of basic language concepts and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 17(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.426.
Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Cantrell, E. B. (2011a). Are pre-service teachers prepared to teach struggling readers? Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0040-y.
Worthy, J., Salmerón, C., Long, S. L., Lammert, C., & Godfrey, V. (2018). “Wrestling with the politics and ideology”: Teacher educators’ responses to dyslexia discourse and legislation. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67(1), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336918786889.
Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2018). Dyslexia laws in the USA: A 2018 update. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 44(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0076-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peltier, T.K., Heddy, B.C. & Peltier, C. Using conceptual change theory to help preservice teachers understand dyslexia. Ann. of Dyslexia 70, 62–78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00192-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00192-z