Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fifty-four students were tested at specific time intervals over 10 years to determine best native language (NL) predictors of oral and written foreign language (FL) proficiency and FL aptitude. All participants completed two years of Spanish, French, or German. Each was administered measures of NL literacy, oral language, and cognitive ability in elementary school. A measure of FL aptitude was administered at the beginning of ninth grade and FL proficiency was evaluated at the end of the 10th grade. Among the variables, NL literacy measures were the best predictors of FL proficiency, and NL achievement and general (verbal) intelligence were strong predictors of FL aptitude. Results suggest that indices of NL literacy as early as first grade are related to FL proficiency and FL aptitude nine and 10 years later. Findings provide strong support for connections between L1 and L2 skills, and for speculation that “lower level” skills in phonological processing are important for written language development and oral proficiency in a FL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, P. G. (1989). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (1986). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (1989). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Proficiency Guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., Luk, G., & Kwan, E. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among language and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, T. (1922). Prognosis tests of ability to learn a foreign language. Journal of Educational Research, 6, 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bus, A., van Ijzendoorn, M., & Pelligrini, A. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training and research in education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language learning. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 1–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959/2000). Modern language aptitude test (MLAT): Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Republished by Second Language Testing, Inc., www.2LTI.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 12, 867–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comeau, L., Cormier, P., Grandmaison, E., & Lacroix, D. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTB/McGraw Hill (1983). Test of cognitive skills. Monterey, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In C. Rivera (Ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement (pp. 2–19). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damian, M., & Bowers, J. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D., McCabe, A., Clark-Chiarelli, N., & Wolf, A. (2004). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness in low-income Spanish and English bilingual preschool children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufva, M., & Voeten, M. (1999). NL literacy and phonological memory as prerequisites for learning English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., & Öney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echols, L., West, R., Stanovich, K., & Zehr, K. (1996). Using children’s literacy activities to predict growth in verbal cognitive skills: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1987). Effects of printed language acquisition speech. In D. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 333–367). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 17, 302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in Spanish phonology on the NL skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1996). Foreign language anxiety among high school women. Modern Language Journal, 80, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (2001). Learning difficulties and foreign language learning: A review of research and instruction. Language Teaching, 34, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., & Javorsky, J. (1998). Foreign language learning problems: An historical perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Bishop-Marbury, A. (1991). Identifying NL difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disability? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 530–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R., & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitude and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S., & Thorn, A. (1998). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 141–158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E. (2000). Issues in the assessment of reading disabilities in L2 children—Beliefs and research evidence. Dyslexia, 6, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1992). Individual differences in L2 proficiency as a function of L1 proficiency. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humes-Bartlo, M. (1989). Variation in children’s ability to learn second languages. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the life span (pp. 41–54). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (1925). Prognosis in foreign languages and secondary schools. School Review, 33, 541–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1992). The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 76, 502–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1998). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. Modern Language Journal, 80, 450–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1981). Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 155–175). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S., & Hammill, D. (1986). Test of written spelling-2 (TWS-2). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lett, J., & O’Meara, F. (1990). Predictors of success in an intensive foreign language learning context: Correlates of language learning at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 222–260). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindamood, L., & Lindamood, P. (1979). Lindamood auditory conceptualization test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, K., Manis, F., & Bailey, C. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 482–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. (2002). Is native-language decoding skill related to second-language learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muljani, D., Koda, K., & Moates, D. (1998). The development of word recognition in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshtain, E., Shohamy, E., Kemp, J., & Chatow, R. (1990). Factors predicting success in EFL among culturally different learners. Language Learning, 40, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. (1990). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A., Bailey, P., & Daley, C. (2000). Cognitive, affective, personality, and demographic predictors of foreign-language achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E., & Al-Haik, A. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimsleur, P. (1966a). Testing foreign language learning. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Trends in language teaching (pp. 175–214). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimsleur, P. (1966b). The Pimsleur language aptitude battery. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (1996). Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude and intelligence. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Foresman and Company. (1987). Test of reading readiness. Glenview, IL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senechal. M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 59–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senechal, M., LeFevre, J., Thomas, E., & Daley, K. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1986a). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 188–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1986b). Where does language aptitude come from? In P. Meara (Ed.), Spoken language (pp. 95–113). London: Center for Information on Language Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Miller, K., Hordubay, D., & Walsh, G. (1998). Benefits of multisensory language instruction in Spanish for at-risk learners: A comparison study of high school Spanish students. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993a). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning problems: Linking first and second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 77, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993b). The impact of NL learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 77, 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995a). A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to MacIntyre. Modern Language Journal, 79, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995b). Parent perceptions in the screening for performance in foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ foreign language academic skills and affective characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., Plageman, M., & Patton, J. (1998). Differences in NL skills, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language grades among high, average, and low proficiency learners: Two studies. Language Testing, 15, 181–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992a). Test comparisons among students identified as high-risk, low-risk, and learning disabled in high school foreign language courses. Modern Language Journal, 76, 142–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton., J. (1992b). Identifying NL deficits in high- and low-risk foreign language learners in high school. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 403–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Kenneweg, S., & Miller, M. (1991). Using Orton-Gillingham methodologies to teach foreign language to learning disabled/dyslexic students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 638–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Patton, J., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1997). Prediction of foreign language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (1998). Principal components analysis of a test battery to predict proficiency in a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 9, 71–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (1995). Prognostication and language aptitude testing. Language Testing, 12, 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K., & Cunningham, A. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 212–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, P. (1930). A foreign language prognosis test. Teachers College Record, 31, 540–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Woolley, L. (1999). First language influences on second language word reading: All roads lead to Rome. Language Learning, 49, 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1981a). Learning through interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1981b). Some antecedents of early educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiederholt, L. (1986). Formal reading inventory. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency affect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 683–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages? A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Education Department, College of Mount St. Joseph, 5701 Delhi Road, 45233-1670, Cincinnati, Ohio

    Richard L. Sparks

  2. Miami (Ohio) University, Oxford, Ohio

    Jon Patton, Leonore Ganschow & Nancy Humbach

  3. Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan

    James Javorsky

Authors
  1. Richard L. Sparks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Patton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leonore Ganschow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nancy Humbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James Javorsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Sparks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sparks, R.L., Patton, J., Ganschow, L. et al. Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Ann. of Dyslexia 56, 129–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0006-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0006-2

Key Words

Search

Navigation