Abstract
Scholars interested in the function of language in mathematical learning often draw on Vygotsky, whose early work on word meaning has shaped many research studies. However, near the end of a rather short life, Vygotsky heavily critiqued his own previous work and began to sketch a radical theory revision, which overturns much of what he had done and is famous for. The purpose of the present study is to elaborate a possible avenue of such a theoretical revision. This study develops the new theory in the course of an exemplary analysis. The data derive from a scientific laboratory, where three scientists discuss a graph as it evolves in real time before their eyes and as a result of transformations designed to recover the real signal from the noise that is apparently present. Implications of the emerging theory for mathematics education are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This actually is a quotation of Marx and Engels (1978), which the English translations, having removed the quotation marks that appear in the original, do not acknowledge as such.
References
Barwell, R. (2016). Formal and informal mathematical discourses: Bakhtin and Vygotsky, dialogue and dialectic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 331–345.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, M., Sawrey, A., K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 181–202.
Cobb, P., & Tzou, C. (2009). Supporting students’ learning about data generation. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Mathematical representation at the interface of body and culture (pp. 135–170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Coutat, S., Laborde, C., & Richard, P. R. (2016). L’apprentissage instrumenté de propriétés en géométrie: propédeutique à l’acquisition d’une compétence de démonstration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 195–221.
Davidson, D. (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. Lepore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation (pp. 433–446). Oxford: Blackwell.
El’konin, B. D. (1994). Vvedenie v psixologiju razvitija: B tradicii kul’turno-istoričeskoj teorii L. S. Vygotskogo. Moscow: Trivola.
Hárosi, F. I. (1987). Cynomolgus and Rhesus monkey visual pigments: Application of Fourier Transform smoothing and statistical techniques to the determination of spectral parameters. Journal of General Physiology, 89, 717–743.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of imagination, reason, and meaning. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Werke Band 3. Berlin: Dietz.
Matusov, E. (2011). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17, 99–119.
Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1938). Philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1972). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). Sens et non-sens. Paris: Gallimard.
Mikhailov, F. T. (2001). The ‘Other Within’ for the psychologist. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 39(1), 6–31.
Nancy, J.-L. (2008). Corpus. New York: Fordham University Press.
Planas, N., Chronaki, A., Rønning, F., & Schütte, M. (2015). Challenges and research priorities in the context of TWG09: Mathematics and Language. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1318–1324). Prague: Charles University and ERME.
Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 101–118.
Radford, L. (2016). The theory of objectification and its place among sociocultural research in mathematics education. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 187–206.
Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 227–245.
Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2011). Signifying and meaning-making in mathematical thinking, teaching, and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 149–156.
Ricœur, P. (1986). Du texte à l’action: Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Roth, W.-M. (2004). Perceptual gestalts in workplace communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1037–1069.
Roth, W.-M. (2005). Making classifications (at) work: Ordering practices in science. Social Studies of Science, 35, 581–621.
Roth, W.-M. (2009). Radical uncertainty in scientific discovery work. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34, 313–336.
Roth, W.-M. (2014a). An integrated theory of thinking and speaking that draws on Vygotsky and Bakhtin/Vološinov. Dialogical Pedagogy, 1, 32–53.
Roth, W.-M. (2014b). Graphing and uncertainty in the discovery sciences: With implications for STEM education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Roth, W.-M. (2015). Meaning and the real life of language: Learning from “pathological” cases in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 30, 42–55.
Roth, W.-M. (2016). On the social nature of mathematical reasoning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(2), 34–39.
Roth, W.-M. (2017). The mathematics of mathematics: Thinking with the late, Spinozist Vygotsky. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Schütz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Vienna: Julius Springer.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Takeuchi, M. A. (2017). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9781-4.
Venkat, H., & Askew, M. (2017). Mediating primary mathematics: Theory, concepts, and a framework for studying practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9776-1.
Vološinov, V. N. (1930). Marksizm i folosofija jazyka: osnovye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda b nauke o jazyke. Leningrad: Priboj.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1. New York: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2010). Two fragments of personal notes by L. S. Vygotsky from the Vygotsky family archive. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 91–96.
Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 347–361.
Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Yasnitsky, A., & Van der Veer R. (Eds.) (2016). Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies. London: Routledge.
Zavershneva, E. I. (2010). The Vygotsky family archive: New findings. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 34–60.
Zavershneva, E. I. (2014). The problem of consciousness in Vygotsky’s cultural-historical psychology. In A. Yasnitsky, R. Van der Veer & M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 63–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgements
Data collection was made possible with the aid of a joint grant from the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Transcription conventions
Appendix: Transcription conventions
The transcription conventions follow Jefferson (2004).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roth, WM. Elaborating the later Vygotsky’s radical initiative on the nature and function of language: implications for mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 50, 975–986 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0912-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0912-x